Abstract
This paper deals with the study of experimental approach and investigation by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) on various flow devices. An orifice meter, venturimeter and a nozzle meter are the most common type of measuring devices used for rate of flow by creating the differences in velocity and pressure. Pressure drop is an important parameter occurring in these flow devices, which is due to restricted passage of flow, properties, diameter ratio, etc. The focus here is to calculate the coefficient of discharge and other flow parameters to analyze theoretically with the application of Bernoulli’s equation. The main objective of this paper is to analyze the variations across the sections of orifice meter, venturimeter and nozzle meter. Comparison of results by both experimental and computational methods was clearly understood, and also, the flow level was calibrated by calculating the coefficient of discharge in both the methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Tamhankar N (2014) Experimental and CFD analysis of flow through venturimeter to determine the coefficient of discharge. Int J Latest Trends Eng Technol 3(4):194–200
Sudhakar K, Visvesvaraya S (2017) Original research paper. Indian J Res 6(7):8–10
Hari Vijay P, Subrahmanyam V (2014) CFD simulation on different geometries of venturimeter. Int J Res Eng Technol 3(7):456–463
Perumal K, Krishnan J (2013) A CFD study of the effect of venturi geometry on high pressure wet gas metering. Int J Oil Gas and Coal Technol 6(5):549–566
Sanghani CR, Jayani DC, Hingu AH, Jadav MY, Jiyavia DV (2016) Comparison of experimental, theoretical and simulation result for pressure drop in sharp edged orifice meter. Int J Sci Eng Technol Res 5(3):775–778
Sanghani C, Jayani D (2016) Optimization of venturimeter geometry for minimum pressure drop using CFD analysis. Recent Trends Fluid Mech 3(2):31–35
Reddy YR (1973) Herschel-type venturimeter discharge coefficients at low Reynolds number. Int J Mech Sci 15(9):757–763
Ouazzane AK, Barigou M (1999) A comparative study of two flow conditioners and their efficacy to reduce asymmetric swirling flow effects on orifice meter performance. Chem Eng Res Design 77(8):747–753
Verma MP (2010) OrificeMeter: an ActiveX component to determine fluid flow in a pipeline. Comput Geosci 36(8):1091–1096
Jana AK, Das G, Kumar P (2008) The hydrodynamics of liquid–liquid upflow through a venturimeter. Int J Multiph Flow 34(12):1119–1129
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the CHRIST (Deemed to be University) Management lead by Vice Chancellor, Dr. (Fr.) Thomas C. Mathew, Engineering Director Dr. Fr. Benny Thomas, Associate Dean, Faculty of Engineering Dr. Iven Joseand Mechanical Department HOD and Associate Professor, Dr. Gurumoorthy S. Hebbar for encouraging this R&D work and permission to present and publish. Also our sincere thanks to Mr. Ganesh, Lab Technician, for the support during our experimental works carried out.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gowtham Sanjai, S., Suresh, V., Bedi, R., Sumanthran, A. (2021). Experimental Approach and CFD Analysis on Flow Devices. In: Rushi Kumar, B., Sivaraj, R., Prakash, J. (eds) Advances in Fluid Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4308-1_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4308-1_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4307-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4308-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)