Skip to main content

Animal Repellents from Agricultural Fields

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Next Generation Information Processing System

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1162 ))

Abstract

Crop damages inflicted by animals are one of the biggest challenges throughout the world. Animals such as pigs, monkeys, and many others may cause Spartan damage to crops. They can damage the plants by feeding on plant parts or only by organization more than the field and squashing in excess of the crops. Therefore, animals may easily cause significant yield losses and incite additional financial problems. In order to decrease the problems or damages caused by animals to the farmer which destroys the farm, there are many ways. The ways include haunting the animals, producing the sounds manually, and using chemical compounds for repelling birds and animals; some are regulated by state and federal laws while others are untested. So, the actuation of ultrasonic devices can repel hazardous animals by using the principles of bioacoustics. Humans have a hearing range of 20 Hz–20 kHz. Similarly, each and every animal as its individual hearing range like rats can hear from 200 Hz to 90 kHz; snakes can hear from 80 Hz to 1 kHz, now over the whole hearing range only in a certain range, known as a most sensitive hearing section which helps to repel animals. An up-gradation to the preexisting methods, utilizing ultrasonic frequencies has been processed to deter animals. Ultrasonic animal repelled produces different sound frequencies depending on the animal species to repel at a particular time. Hence, the high-frequency and high amount sound waves are used to drive away from the animals, which cause harm to farms. Those ultrasonic sounds can repel animals or rodents (including rats, pigs, and monkeys). For repelling different animals, separate electronic circuits will be designed to produce sound waves of different frequencies. These frequencies are time-multiplexed using Arduino UNO and radiate into the air to repel animals. These signals are to be amplified using an amplification circuit. These amplified signals are given to the speaker to produce different sounds at different time intervals. However, these frequencies do not disturb the hearing ability of persons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kim, S.-H., Kim, D.-H., Park H.-D.: Animal situation tracking service using RFID, GPS and sensors. In: Second International Conference on Computer and Network Technology, pp. 153–156 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baranwal, T., Pateriya, P.K.: Development of IoT based smart security and monitoring devices for agriculture. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Cloud System and Big Data Engineering (Confluence), Noida, India, 14–15 Jan 2016, pp. 597–602 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saini, S.S., Bansal, D., Brar, G.S., Sidhu, E.: Solar energy driven Arduino based smart mosquito repeller system. In: This Full-Text Paper was Peer-Reviewed and Accepted to be Presented at the IEEE Wisp NET 2016 Conference, pp. 1239–1243 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shetgaonkar, A.A., Shet, V.N.: Smart animal repeller. In: International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS-2017), pp. 3303–3308 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, N., Thompson, C.J., Togane, D., Cayouette, F., Nguyen, K.Q., Camborde, M.-L.: Design of front-end electronic circuits for dedicated PET detectors. In: IEEE Nuclear and Science Symposium Conference Records (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Milosavljevic, Z., Cvetkovic, M., Dekleva, N., Radojkovic, M., Majic, V.: Interaction of magnetic field and sulphur-mustard in animals. In: Annual International conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 12, no. 4 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miyaoka, R.S., Lewellen, T.K.: Design analysis of a high-resolution detector block for a low-cost small animal positron emission imaging system, pp. 1370–1374 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Correia, J.A., Burnham, C.A., Kaufman, D., Brownell, A., Fischman, A.J.: Quasi-continuous detector module design for high-resolution small animal PET. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Francis, J.T., Chapin, J.K.: Force field apparatus for investigating movement control in small animals. IEEE Trans. BME 51(6), 963–964 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karlsson, J., Ren, K., Li, H.: Tracking and identification of animals for a digital zoo. In: 2010 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Green Computing and Communications & 2010 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, pp. 510–515 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yeu, C.Y.: Animal voice recognition for identification (ID) detection system. In: 2011 IEEE 7th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kutrowski, T.M., Meydan, T., Barnes, J., Aldoumani, N., Erichsen, J.T.: Instrumentation for monitoring animal movements. In: Proceedings IEEE SENSORS, pp. 1295–1299 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Forslund, D., Bjarkefur, J.: Night vision animal detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 737–742 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Radha, R., Kathiravan, K., Vineeth, V., Sanjay, v., Venkatesh, S.: Prevention of Monkey trespassing in agricultural field using application agricultural specific flooding approach in wireless sensor network. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Technological Innovations in ICT for Agriculture and Rural Development (TIAR 2015), pp. 106–111 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart J.L.: Experiments with sounds in repelling mammals. In: Proceedings of the 6th Vertebrate Pest Conference, pp. 47 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tiwari, DK., Alam, MA.: Electronic pest repellent: a review. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.13557.78569 (2016)

  17. Siahaan, Y., Wardijono, B.A., Mukhlis, Y.: Design of birds detector and repellent using frequency based Arduino UNO with android system. In: 2017 2nd International Conferences on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saha, S.R., Ghosh, D., Mandal, K.K.: Mosquito repellent circuit. Int. J. Eng. Tec. Res. (IJETR)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yash, S.: Electronic mosquito repellent. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioacoustics

  21. https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Bioacoustics

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Durgesh Nandan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sreevardhan, P., Vidheya Raju, B., Nandan, D. (2021). Animal Repellents from Agricultural Fields. In: Deshpande, P., Abraham, A., Iyer, B., Ma, K. (eds) Next Generation Information Processing System. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1162 . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4851-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics