Skip to main content

Sefficiency (Sustainable Efficiency)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transparent Water Management Theory

Part of the book series: Water Resources Development and Management ((WRDM))

Abstract

There is a fundamental difference between descriptive and performance indicators of a water use system. The former responds to the question “What is happening?”, and the latter focuses on the questions, such as “Does it matter? Are we reaching targets?” To answer these questions, we use efficiency as a performance indicator, which “helps us attain more of the things we value.” To this end, we employ the theory presented in the previous Chapter to develop systemic, comprehensive and objective performance indicators based on a universal principle integrating the differentials of the three Pillars of water management, namely water quantity, water quality and water benefit. They reveal trade-offs among the three Pillars at three levels of management with climate and energy descriptors and stakeholder enablers. The internal behaviour and the trade-offs of these Sefficiency indicators are explained and shown graphically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayers R, Westcot D (1994) Water quality for agriculture (FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29), UN FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Benito P et al (2009) Study on water efficiency standards (final report). Bio Intelligence Service and Cranefield University, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger A, Hill TP (2015) An introduction to Benford’s law, 1st edn. Princeton University Press, sl

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer C, Heibloem M (1986) Irrigation water management: irrigation water needs. UN FAO, Rome, Itay

    Google Scholar 

  • CCME (2017) Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: CCME Water Quality Index. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ccme.ca/files/Resources/water/water_quality/WQI%20Manual%20EN.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2019

  • CDWR (2019) Glossary—California Department of Water Resources (CDWR). [Online]. Available at: https://water.ca.gov/Water-Basics/Glossary. Accessed 23 Dec 2019

  • Coca-Cola Company (2018) Improving our water efficiency. [Online]. Available at: https://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/setting-a-new-goal-for-water-efficiency. Accessed 9 July 2019

  • Coelli T, Rao D, O’Donnell C, Battese G (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworak T et al (2007) EU water saving potential (Part 1 - Final Report). Ecologic Institute for International and European Environmental, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2015) EEA indicators. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission Water (2019) Building blocks: water efficiency activities (Last updated: 08-Jul-2019). [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/quantity/water_efficiency.htm. Accessed 28 Dec 2019

  • European Commission (2019) Environment. [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource_efficiency/index_en.htm. Accessed 31 May 2019

  • European Parliament & Council (2000) Water Framework Directive, Official Journal L 327, European Union. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2018

  • FAO & WWC (2015) Towards a water and food secure future: critical perspectives for policy-makers. UN-FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch E (2012) King midas: the seven deadly sins and externalities. Water Resour IMPACT 14(1):19

    Google Scholar 

  • Haie N, Keller A (2012) Macro, meso, and micro-efficiencies in water resources management: a new framework using water balance. J Am Water Resour Assoc (JAWRA) 48(2):235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haie N (2013) Sefficiency (sustainable efficiency): a systemic framework for advancing water security. Wuhan University, Wuhan and Yichang, Hubei

    Google Scholar 

  • Haie N (2016) Sefficiency (sustainable efficiency) of water-energy-food entangled systems. Int J Water Resour Dev 32(5):721–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto T, Stedinger J, Loucks D (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra A, Chapagain A, Aldaya M, Mekonnen M (2011) The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Rosenfield A, Gandhi L, Blaser T (2016) Noise: how to overcome the high, hidden cost of inconsistent decision making. Harvard Business Rev, October, pp 36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller A, Keller J (1995) Effective efficiency: a water use efficiency concept for allocating freshwater resources. Winrock International, Arlington, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Klise KA et al (2017) Water Network Tool for Resilience (WNTR) user manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA/600/R-17/264), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks D, Van Beek E (2005) Water resources systems planning and management: an introduction to methods, models and applications. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP (2002) Quantifying system sustainability using multiple risk criteria. s.l., Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MathWorks (2018) MatLab. [Online]. Available at: MathWorks MatLab https://www.mathworks.com. Accessed 19 Mar 2018

  • Maxwell D et al (2011) Addressing the Rebound Effect. European Commission DG Environment, sl

    Google Scholar 

  • MEEC (1997) Environmental quality standards for surface water. [Online]. Available at: http://english.mee.gov.cn/SOE/soechina1997/water/standard.htm. Accessed 17 June 2019

  • MEEC (2018) 2017 Report on the State of the Environment in China. [Online]. Available at: http://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/Reports/soe. Accessed 19 June 2019

  • Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2019) Target. [Online]. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/target. Accessed 31 May 2019

  • NASDAQ-100 n.d. NASDAQ-100 equal weighted index shares (QQQE). [Online] Available at: https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/qqqe. Accessed 23 June 2019

  • National Laboratory of Civil Engineering (2001) Programa Nacional para o Uso Eficiente da Água. National Institute of Water (INAG), Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigrini M, Miller S (2007) Benford’s law applied to hydrology data: results and relevance to other geophysical data. Math Geol 39(5):469–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Water quality index. [Online]. Available at: http://stats.oecd.org/glossary. Accessed 30 June 2012

  • Oxford Dictionary (2018) ‘meso-‘. [Online]. Available at: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/meso. Accessed 19 Mar 2018

  • Portuguese Environment Agency (2019a) River basin management plans—3rd cycle. Portuguese Environment Agency, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Portuguese Environment Agency (2019b) Roadmap for carbonic neutrality 2050/strategic environmental assessment. Portuguese Environment Agency, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice, Revised edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Seckler D, Molden D, Sakthivadivel R (2003) The concept of efficiency in water-resources management and policy. s.l., CABI Publishing and International Water Management Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone D (2012) Policy paradox: the art of political decision making, 3rd edn. W. W. Norton & Company Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2007) Global drinking water quality index development and sensitivity analysis report. GEMS (Global Environment Monitoring System) Water Programme Office, Burlington, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-HLPW (2017) Bellagio principles on valuing water. United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), High Level Panel on Water. [Online]. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/15591Bellagio_principles_on_valuing_water_final_version_in_word.pdf. Accessed 29 Sept 2017

  • Weisstein EW (2018) Benford’s law. MathWorld, A Wolfram Web Resource. [Online]. Available at: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BenfordsLaw.html. Accessed 24 Mar 2018

  • Wichelns D (2014) Water productivity: Not a helpful indicator of farm-level optimization. [Online]. Available at: http://www.globalwaterforum.org/2014/11/11/water-productivity-not-a-helpful-indicator-of-farm-level-optimization. Accessed 2 July 2019

  • Willardson LS, Allen R, Frederiksen H (1994) Elimination of irrigation efficiencies. USCID, Denver, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naim Haie .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haie, N. (2021). Sefficiency (Sustainable Efficiency). In: Transparent Water Management Theory. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6284-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics