Skip to main content

Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Surgery

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Pediatric Surgery

Abstract

Ethical issues arise in pediatric surgery when difficult decisions must be made in the presence of uncertainty or conflict, and stakeholders are concerned about quality of life, informed decision-making, and access to scarce medical resources. This chapter provides the pediatric surgeon with a framework for ethical decision-making that relies on a best interest standard and includes a definition of this standard and also the appropriate application and limitations of the best interest standard. Decision-making for adolescents includes a discussion of informed consent and assent. The best interest standard is discussed in the context of multiculturalism. Other issues include prenatal surgical consultation and fetal surgery, bariatric surgery, conflicts of interest, errors and innovation, and clinical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACOG Committee on Ethics. Patient choice in the maternal-fetal relationship. In: Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Guidelines on foregoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics. 1994;93(3):532–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 1995;95(2):314–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Ethics and the care of critically ill infants and children. Pediatrics. 1996;98(1):149–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Religious objections to medical care. Pediatrics. 1997;99(2):279–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Fetal therapy – ethical considerations. Pediatrics. 1999;103(5 Pt 1):1061–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Hospital Care, Institute for Family-Centered Care. Family-centered care and the pediatrician’s role. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3 Pt 1):691–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Research. Promoting education, mentorship, and support in pediatric research. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1447–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylis F, Caniano DA. Medical ethics and the pediatric surgeon. In: Oldham KT, Colombani PM, Foglia RP, editors. Surgery of infants and children. Philadelphia: Lipincott-Raven; 1997. p. 281–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp T. Response to Garcia. In: Flack HE, Pellegrino ED, editors. African-American perspectives in biomedical ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 1992. p. 67–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell SK, Moorman DW, Delbanco T. Improving the patient, family, and clinician experience after harmful events: the “when things go wrong” curriculum. Acad Med. 2010;85(6):1010–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blacksher E. Children’s health inequalities: ethical and political challenges to seeking social justice. Hast Cent Rep. 2008;38(4):28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer L. The ethical grounds for the best interest of the child. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2016;25(1):63–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L, Blumenthal D, Chimonas SC, Cohen JJ, Goldman J, Kassirer JP, Kimball H, Naughton J, Smelser N. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA. 2006;295(4):429–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Moore DA. The dirt on coming clean: perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. J Leg Stud. 2005;34(1):1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caniano DA. Ethical issues in the management of neonatal surgical anomalies. Semin Perinatol. 2004;28(3):240–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caniano DA. Ethical issues in pediatric bariatric surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2009;18(3):186–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caniano DA, Baylis F. Ethical considerations in prenatal surgical consultation (see commentary). Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15(5–6):303–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Ethics of fetal surgery. Clin Perinatol. 2009;36(2):237–46. vii–viii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmas C, Ziegelstein RC. The seventh competency. Teach Learn Med. 2009;21(2):159–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot C. Where ethics comes from and what to do about it. Hast Cent Rep. 1992;22(4):28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000;283(20):2701–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Killen J, Grady C. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:930–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English A, Bass L, Boyle AD, et al. State minor consent Laws: a summary. 3rd ed. Chapel Hill: Center for Adolescent Health and the Law; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flotte TR, Frentzen B, Humphries MR, Rosenbloom AL. Recent developments in the protection of pediatric research subjects. J Pediatr. 2006;149(3):285–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flum DR, Khan TV, Dellinger EP. Toward the rational and equitable use of bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2007;298(12):1442–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia J. African-American perspectives, cultural relativism, and normative issues: some conceptual questions. In: Flack HE, Pellegrino ED, editors. African-American perspectives in biomedical ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 1992. p. 11–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill D. Ethical principles and operational guidelines for good clinical practice in paediatric research. Recommendations of the ethics working group of the confederation of European specilists in paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr. 2004;163(2):53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover JJ, Caniano DA. Ethical issues in treating infants with very low birth weight. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2000;9(2):56–62. 9a. Diekema DS. Parental refusals of medical treatments: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention. Theor Med Bioeth. 2004;25(4):243–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover JJ, Ringel SP, Yarborough M. Gifts from industry in practical ethics in clinical neurology: a case-based approach. In: Williams MA, editors. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p. 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helman CG. Culture, health and illness. London: Wright Publishing; 1990. p. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe EG. Ethical issues in fetal surgery. Semin Perinatol. 2003;27(6):446–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, Committee on Quality of Health Care in American, Institute of Medicine, editors. To err is human: building a safer health care system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine RJ. Ethics and regulation of clinical research. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little M. Invited commentary; is there a distinctively surgical ethics? Surgery. 2001;129(6):668–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lo B. Overview of conflicts of interest. In: Resolving ethical dilemmas: a guide for clinicians. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 231–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin R. Ethical relativism in a multicultural society. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998;8(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly SS. The maternal/fetal dyad: exploring the two-patient obstetrical model. Hast Cent Rep. 1992;22(1):13–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick R. To save or let die: the dilemma of modern medicine. JAMA. 1974;229(2):172–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKneally MF. Ethical problems in surgery; innovation leading to unforeseen complications. World J Surg. 1999;23(8):786–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noritz G. How can we practice ethical medicine when the evidence is always changing? J Child Neurol. 2015;30(11):1549–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwomeh BC, Caniano DA. Ethical consideration. In: Coran AG, Caldamone A, Adzick NS, Krummel TM, Laberge J, Shamberger R, editors. Pediatric surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino ED. Intersections of western biomedical ethics. In: Pellegrino ED, Corsi PMP, editors. Transcultural dimensions in medical ethics. Frederick: University Publishing Group; 1992. p. 13–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinxten W, Dierickx K, Nys H. Ethical principles and legal requirements for pediatric research in the EU; an analysis of the European normative and legal framework surrounding pediatric clinical trials. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168(10):1225–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raper SE, Sarwer DB. Informed consent issues in the conduct of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(1):60–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes R, Holzman IR. Is the best interest standard good for pediatrics? Pediatrics. 2014;134(Suppl 2):S121–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin ML, Caniano DA. Analysis of clinical bioethics teaching in pediatric surgery residency. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(2):373–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ville Y. Fetal therapy: practical ethical consideration. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:621–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei M. Doctors, apologies, and the law: an analysis and critique of apology laws. J Health Law. 2007;40(1):107–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter is based on a previous published chapter – Glover, Jacqueline and Caniano, Donna. Ethical Considerations in Newborn Surgery in Newborn Surgery 3rd edition, Prem Puri editor. pages 228–236. CRC Press, November 2011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline J. Glover .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Glover, J.J., Nwomeh, B.C. (2019). Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Surgery. In: Puri, P. (eds) Pediatric Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_34-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_34-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38482-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38482-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Surgery
    Published:
    31 August 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_34-2

  2. Original

    Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Surgery
    Published:
    03 March 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_34-1