Abstract
This contribution introduces a reconceptualization of (mis)recognition that stresses “creative agency” (gift, work, etc.) as a condition of self-consciousness. Drawing on Hegel’s Phenomenology, I argue that recognition struggles are often less motivated by the actors’ desire to have a special status than by the desire to make a “contribution” to society, to “give” something. The content of a socially valued contribution-gift (as per Marcel Mauss) varies from one society to another but it is linked to the very ability of actors to act on their “own” and to shape their environment. Thus, subjects identifying with political units or social groups with little recognized agency, while imagining significant abilities to contribute to a given society, will easily feel slighted. It is impossible to be recognized as “subjects” if one is denied the ability to “contribute” to a given society. I apply this perspective to the study of international relations and illustrate my proposal with Islamic State violence. These individuals experience “individual” agency denial inside the ‘national’ community but also agency denial of “Muslim sovereignty” from the outside. This “upscaling” of agency misrecognition is enhanced by the possible identification of an individual with a collective actor and the associated emotional investment in such a community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Bartelson, Jens. 2013. Three concepts of recognition. International Theory 5(1): 107–129.
Caillé, Alain. 2007. La quête de reconnaissance. Paris: La Découverte.
Duncombe, Constance. 2015. Representation, recognition and foreign policy in the Iran US relationship. European Journal of International Relations 21(1): 1–24.
Fehl, Caroline, and Georgios Kolliarkis. 2015. Recognition in international relations: Rethinking a political concept in a global context. London: Springer.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1991. Elements of the philosophy of right. Trans. H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2012. Globalising love. On the nature and scope of love as a form of recognition. Res Publica 18(1): 11–24.
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2008. A cultural theory of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindemann, Thomas. 2011. Causes of war. The struggle for recognition. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Markell, Patchen. 2003. Bound by recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mauss, Marcel. 1950. Essais sur le don–forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques in Sociologie et Anthropologie. Paris: PUF.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ringmar, Erik. 1996. Identity, interest and action: a cultural explanation of Sweden’s intervention in the Thirty Years War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 2001. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.
Wolf, Reinhard. 2011. Respect and disrespect in international politics: The significance of status recognition. International Theory 3: 105–142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lindemann, T. (2020). Recognition and International Relations. In: Siep, L., Ikaheimo, H., Quante, M. (eds) Handbuch Anerkennung. Springer Reference Geisteswissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19561-8_64-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19561-8_64-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-19561-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-19561-8
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht