Abstract
Direct modification of the genome of the zygotes (i.e., one-cell embryos) by the CRISPR/Cas9-editing reagents, followed by embryo transfer to pseudopregnant females for live birth, has been the most effective method to generate laboratory rodent models for research. The method relies on proper delivery of the editing reagents into zygotes, which is commonly achieved by a standard or slightly modified pronuclear microinjection technique. In this chapter, we describe in detail an alternative delivery method, named piezo-driven cytoplasmic microinjection, which offers a superior embryo survival and birth rate. Because this method uses a much wider injection needle than that in pronuclear injection, it allows a larger volume of the editing materials to be transported into the zygotes, leading to an increase in the targeting efficiency. This also eliminates the clogging issues seen regularly in pronuclear injection. Moreover, Cytochalasin B that is used to soften zygotes during piezo-driven microinjection has been suggested a role in improving the knockin efficiency, which provides an additional benefit to use this injection method.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F, Jaenisch R (2013) One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153(4):910–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025
Yang H, Wang H, Shivalila CS, Cheng AW, Shi L, Jaenisch R (2013) One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 154(6):1370–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.022
Li D, Qiu Z, Shao Y, Chen Y, Guan Y, Liu M, Li Y, Gao N, Wang L, Lu X, Zhao Y, Liu M (2013) Heritable gene targeting in the mouse and rat using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 31(8):681–683. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2661
Li W, Teng F, Li T, Zhou Q (2013) Simultaneous generation and germline transmission of multiple gene mutations in rat using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31(8):684–686. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2652
Yuan CL, Hu YC (2017) A transgenic core facility’s experience in genome editing revolution. Adv Exp Med Biol 1016:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63904-8_4
Ittner LM, Gotz J (2007) Pronuclear injection for the production of transgenic mice. Nat Protoc 2(5):1206–1215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.145
Horii T, Arai Y, Yamazaki M, Morita S, Kimura M, Itoh M, Abe Y, Hatada I (2014) Validation of microinjection methods for generating knockout mice by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Sci Rep 4:4513. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04513
Singh P, Schimenti JC, Bolcun-Filas E (2015) A mouse geneticist’s practical guide to CRISPR applications. Genetics 199(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.169771
Hashimoto M, Takemoto T (2015) Electroporation enables the efficient mRNA delivery into the mouse zygotes and facilitates CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing. Sci Rep 5:11315. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11315
Kaneko T, Mashimo T (2015) Simple genome editing of rodent intact embryos by electroporation. PLoS One 10(11):e0142755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142755
Qin W, Dion SL, Kutny PM, Zhang Y, Cheng AW, Jillette NL, Malhotra A, Geurts AM, Chen YG, Wang H (2015) Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in mice by zygote electroporation of nuclease. Genetics 200(2):423–430. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.176594
Chen S, Lee B, Lee AY, Modzelewski AJ, He L (2016) Highly efficient mouse genome editing by CRISPR ribonucleoprotein electroporation of zygotes. J Biol Chem 291(28):14457–14467. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.733154
Yoshida N, Perry AC (2007) Piezo-actuated mouse intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Nat Protoc 2(2):296–304. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.7
Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R (1998) Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 394(6691):369–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/28615
Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R (1995) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol Reprod 52(4):709–720
Kawase Y, Iwata T, Watanabe M, Kamada N, Ueda O, Suzuki H (2001) Application of the piezo-micromanipulator for injection of embryonic stem cells into mouse blastocysts. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 40(2):31–34
Nakao H, Harada T, Nakao K, Kiyonari H, Inoue K, Furuta Y, Aiba A (2016) A possible aid in targeted insertion of large DNA elements by CRISPR/Cas in mouse zygotes. Genesis 54(2):65–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.22914
Acknowledgments
We thank current and former staff members, Yinhuai Chen, Huirong Xie, Alexandra Falcone, Susan Martin, Celvie Yuan, Evan Barr-Beare, Calista Falcone, Kendall Smith, and Kristen Martin for performing the services and generating the data for this article. This work was supported by Cincinnati Children’s Research Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Scott, M.A., Hu, YC. (2019). Generation of CRISPR-Edited Rodents Using a Piezo-Driven Zygote Injection Technique. In: Liu, C., Du, Y. (eds) Microinjection. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1874. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8831-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8831-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8830-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8831-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols