Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Articulation, Behavior, and Control in the World of Tomorrow: Public Servants and the Use of Social Technologies

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant

  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

This entry explores the core issues that underpin the use of social technologies within public service. Since the advent of social media, a tension has existed in the way such technologies are used and in terms of the parameters (or lack of) to regulate their usage. The indispensable nature of such tools in establishing an online presence that enhances profile and communication, and the difficulty of managing the way public servants use them, are two sides of the same coin. The entry takes stock of existing knowledge, draws theoretical considerations, and considers new insights for emerging empirical developments. Consequently, three aspects on the use of social technologies; articulation, behavior, and control (the ABCs), are proposed as a conceptual framework. Finally, this entry considers the new technologies that public servants ought to harness as tools that bring about opportunities for the public sector. The challenge is to reskill public servants and ensure that social technologies contribute to problem-solving in an effective manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agostino, D. 2013. Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities. Public Relations Review 39: 232–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L., S. Berg, P. Bhat, N. Grigoryan, N. Gjoci, K. Howley, … C. Painter. 2019. Alternative media meets mainstream politics: Activist nation rising. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Androutsopoulou, A., N. Karacapilidis, E. Loukis, and Y. Charalabidis. 2019. Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots. Government Information Quarterly 36 (2): 358–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, R., E. Ferlie, G. Hammerschmid, M.J. Moon, and T. Reay. 2013. Theorizing contemporary public management: International and comparative perspectives. British Journal of Management 24: S1–S17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aucoin, P. 2012. New political governance in Westminster systems: Impartial public administration and management performance at risk. Governance 25 (2): 177–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S.B. 2006. A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday 11 (9): 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A., N. Balnave, and P. Holland. 2018. “Utterly disgraceful”: Social media and the workplace. Australian Journal of Public Administration 77 (3): 492–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedi, P., H. Kaur, and S. Marwaha 2007. Trust based recommender system for semantic web. In IJCAI, vol. 7, 2677–2682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertot, J.C., P.T. Jaeger, and D. Hansen. 2012. The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly 29: 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D.M., and N.B. Ellison. 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 210–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryer, T.A., and S.M. Zavattaro. 2011. Social media and public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis 33: 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundin, M., and A. Martynov. 2017. Legal and ethical aspects of social media use by public employees in Russia. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, March 2017, 574–575. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047337.

  • Chiara, A. 2018. Public officials’ social media accounts – Are they business or pleasure? The Hill. https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/371131-public-officials-social-media-accounts-are-they-business-or-pleasure. Accessed 5 June 2019.

  • Chun, S.A., and L.F.L. Reyes. 2012. Social media in government. Government Information Quarterly 29(2012): 441–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.003

  • Cohen, C.F., and M.E. Cohen. 2007. On-duty and off-duty: Employee right to privacy and employer’s right to control in the private sector. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 19: 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colace, F., L. Casaburi, M. De Santo, and L. Greco. 2015. Sentiment detection in social networks and in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior 51: 1061–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criado, J.I., R. Sandoval-Almazan, and J.R. Gil-Garcia. 2013. Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly 30: 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC). 2017. Corruption prevention advisory, Queensland, July 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukier, K., and V. Mayer-Schoenberger. 2013. The rise of big data: How it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs 92: 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J. 1993. Rethinking the media as a public sphere. In Communication and citizenship, ed. P. Dahlgren and C. Sparks, 27–57. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. 2016. Fake or real? How to self-check the news and get the facts. https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/12/05/503581220/fake-or-real-how-to-self-check-the-news-and-get-the-facts. Accessed 3 Oct 2020.

  • DiFranzo, D., and M.J.K. Gloria. 2017. Filter bubbles and fake news. ACM Crossroads 23 (3): 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingli, A., and D. Seychell. 2015. The new digital natives. Cutting the chord. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donath, J.S. 2002. Identity and deception in the virtual community. In Communities in cyberspace, 37–68. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. 2010. Using web analytics to measure the impact of earned online media on business outcomes: A methodological approach. Institute for Public Relations. https://instituteforpr.org/using-web-analytics. Accessed 5 June 2019.

  • Fast, I., K. Sørensen, H. Brand, and S. Suggs. 2014. Social media for public health: An exploratory policy analysis. European Journal of Public Health 25 (1): 162–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gains, F., and G. Stoker. 2009. Delivering “public value”: Implications for accountability and legitimacy. Parliamentary Affairs 62 (3): 438–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandasegui, V.D. 2017. The rise and fall of Second Life. Second Life in the Information Society. Revista Digital Universitaria 13(5): 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner. 2017. Gartner says by 2020, artificial intelligence will create more jobs than it eliminates. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2017-12-13-gartner-says-by-2020-artificial-intelligence-will-create-more-jobs-than-it-eliminates

  • Gašpar, D., and M. Mabić. 2019. Social media: Towards open government. Economics of Digital Transformation. University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business. 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. 2018. Public sector employees and the freedom of political communication. Alternative Law Journal 43 (1): 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grube, D.C. 2017. Rules, prudence and public value: Public servants and social media in comparative perspective. Government and Opposition 52 (1): 75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawong, P. 2014. Open government and social media: A focus on transparency. Social Science Computer Review 33 (5): 587–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, M., T. Haigh, and N.I. Kozak. 2018. Stopping fake news: The work practices of peer-to-peer counter propaganda. Journalism Studies 19 (14): 2062–2087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, E., and B. Berger. 2017. Escaping reality: Examining the role of presence and escapism in user adoption of virtual reality glasses. In: Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, June 5–10, 2017. 2413–2428. ISBN 978-989-20-7655-3 Research Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimdal, K.W. 2019. The effect of chatbots on employment in Norwegian municipalities. Oslo University. Master’s thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howcroft, D. 2001. After the goldrush: Deconstructing the myths of the dot.com market. Journal of Information Technology 16 (4): 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2013. Social media guidelines for Parliaments. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iosifidis, P. 2011. The public sphere, social networks and public service media. Information, Communication & Society 14 (5): 619–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, W., and S. Tufts. 2011. To post or not to post: Employee rights and social media. Review of Public Personnel Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X12443265.

  • Jaman, S.F.I., and M. Anshari. 2019. Facebook as marketing tools for organizations: Knowledge management analysis. In Dynamic perspectives on globalization and sustainable business in Asia, 92–105. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jukić, T., and M. Merlak. 2017. The use of social networking sites in public administration: The case of Slovenia. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 15 (1): 2–18. Available online at www.ejeg.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankanhalli, A., Y. Charalabidis, and S. Mellouli. 2019. IoT and AI for smart government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly 36 (2): 304–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A.M., and M. Haenlein. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons 53: 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakiza, M. 2014. The impact of social media in the public sector. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 175: 384–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, G.F., M.C. Hoffman, and T. Misztur. 2014. Best practices in social media at public, nonprofit, education, and health care organizations. Social Science Computer Review 32 (5): 571–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kietzmann, J., K. Hermkens, I. McCarthy, and B. Silvestre. 2011. Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons 54: 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klusch, M., ed. 2012. Intelligent information agents: Agent-based information discovery and management on the Internet. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koncar, M. 2014. Social media for smart government. Oracle ECEMEA region, Oct 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. 2005. Barriers to e-government integration. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18 (5): 511–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leston-Bandeira, C., and D. Bender. 2013. How deeply are parliaments engaging on social media? Information Polity 18 (4): 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S.Y., P.T. Fotsing, A. Almasri, O. Musa, M.L.M. Kiah, T.F. Ang, and R. Ismail. 2018. Blockchain technology the identity management and authentication service disruptor: A survey. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology 8 (4-2): 1735–1745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, C. 2015. Role of social media in promoting transparency in an open government era in SAARC countries with special reference to India. https://ojs.imodev.org/index.php/RIDDN/article/view/153/228. Accessed 1 Sept 2020.

  • Marres, N., and D. Moats. 2015. Mapping controversies with social media: The case for symmetry. Social Media + Society 1 (2): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, P. 2019. Key technological advancements in retail. In Machine learning applications using Python, 159–181. Berkeley: Apress.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, J. 2014. The implications of social media for parliamentary privilege and procedure. Canadian Parliamentary Review 2014: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergel, I. 2012. The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity 17 (3–4): 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergel, I., and S.I. Bretschneider. 2013. A three-stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Administration Review 73 (3): 390–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickoleit, A. 2014. Social media use by governments: A policy primer to discuss trends, identify policy opportunities and guide decision makers, OECD working papers on public governance, no. 26. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrcmghmk0s-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., et al. 2016. What is social media? London: UCL Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1g69z35.8. Accessed 13 June 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitnick, K.D., and W.L. Simon. 2011. The art of deception: Controlling the human element of security. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modgil, S., N. Faci, F. Meneguzzi, N. Oren, S. Miles, and M. Luck. 2009, May. A framework for monitoring agent-based normative systems. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 153–160. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.H. 1995. Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, K. 2019. Social media, political science, and democracy. The Journal of Politics 81 (3). https://doi.org/10.1086/703490.

  • Myers, C., J. Ball, N. Cooke, M. Freiman, M. Caisse, S. Rodgers, … N. McNeese. 2018. Autonomous intelligent agents for team training. IEEE Intelligent Systems 34(2): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, S. 2017. Using social media to engage nurses in health policy development. Journal of Nursing Management 2017 (25): 632–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2017. Government at a glance. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OPM No. 21/2015. 2015. Policy on the use of social media in public service. Valletta: Office of the Prime Minister, Auberge de Castille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paek, T., M. Gamon, S. Counts, D.M. Chickering, and A. Dhesi. 2010, July. Predicting the importance of newsfeed posts and social network friends. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, July 11–15, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papesh, M.H. 2018. Photo ID verification remains challenging despite years of practice. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 3 (1): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2004. Public management reform: A comparative analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon 9 (5): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, B. 2011. Re-imagining government: Public leadership and management in challengin times. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisenger, D. 2019. A.I. expert says automation could replace 40% of jobs in 15 years. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2019/01/10/automation-replace-jobs/

  • Rymaszewski, M., W.J. Au, M. Wallace, C. Winters, C. Ondrejka, and B. Batstone-Cunningham. 2007. Second life: The official guide. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaife, N., P. Traynor, and K. Butler. 2017. Making sense of the ransomware mess (and planning a sensible path forward). IEEE Potentials 36 (6): 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, R., ed. 2012. The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, J. 2018. Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, C., G.L. Ciampaglia, O. Varol, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. 2017. The spread of fake news by social bots. Indiana University, Bloomington. arXiv:1707.07592, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaržauskienė, A., R. Tamošiūnaitė, and I. Žalėnienė. 2013. Defining social technologies. In 4th International conference on Information systems management and evaluation, RMIT University Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social and Cultural Planning Office (SCP). 2004. The Hague, The Netherlands. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/18513118.pdf Accessed 1 Sept 2020.

  • Song, C., and J. Lee. 2015. Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government. Public Performance & Management Review 39 (3): 430–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, J. 1992. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 42 (4): 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoian, A.M. 2019. Education, social and media communication. Revista de Stiinte Politice 62: 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. 2009. Public value – The next “big thing” in public management? International Journal of Public Administration 32 (3–4): 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. 2014. How the public sector is finding its social media voice. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/12/how-the-public-sector-is-finding-its-social-media-voice. Accessed 1 June 2019.

  • Turkle, S. 2011. Life on the screen. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck, J., and T. Poell. 2015. Social media and the transformation of public space. Social Media + Society 1: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosoughi, S., D. Roy, and S. Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359 (6380): 1146–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijeratne, Y., N. de Silva, and Y. Shanmugarajah. 2019. Natural language processing for government: Problems and potential. International Development Research Centre (Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Y. Cheng, X. Wang, and Q. Liu. 2018. Online handwritten signature verification using feature weighting algorithm relief. Soft Computing 22 (23): 7811–7823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavattaro, S.M. 2013. Social media in public administration’s future: A response to Farazmand. Administration and Society 45 (2): 242–255.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Policy, University of Malta, Msida, Malta

    George Vital Zammit

  2. Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Malta, Msida, Malta

    Alexiei Dingli

Authors
  1. George Vital Zammit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexiei Dingli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Vital Zammit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia

    Helen Sullivan

  2. UNSW Australia, Campbell, ACT, Australia

    Helen Dickinson

  3. College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

    Hayley Henderson

Section Editor information

  1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Gemma Carey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Zammit, G.V., Dingli, A. (2021). Articulation, Behavior, and Control in the World of Tomorrow: Public Servants and the Use of Social Technologies. In: Sullivan, H., Dickinson, H., Henderson, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_38-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_38-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03008-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03008-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation