Skip to main content

Being Good to Do Good: Public Servants and Public Ethics in the Twenty-First Century

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant

Abstract

Governments design and deliver public infrastructure, public services, and regulatory frameworks to meet the current and future challenges facing their societies and their economies. Their general aim is to do good. But to do good, they have to be good.

They need sufficient capacity to act where public action is required. And they need to possess genuine capability so as to generate and realize positive change for the better. Good intentions and ample resources are not enough to deliver good outcomes. Citizen-focused and evidence-based approach to policy making can ensure that the right public policies are being pursued. But are they being implemented in the right way, and are politicians and public servants doing the right things to assure cost-effective and trustworthy government action?

Public ethics and citizens’ experience of fairness lie at the heart of good public services. And it is why the ethical behavior of politicians, senior public executives, and mainstream public servants is central in shaping the overall ability of governments to do good.

Considerations as to what constitutes ethical behavior (both positive and negative) will vary across nations and cultures. But despite this, there are widely accepted practices of good behaviors that need to be encouraged and bad behaviors that need to be eliminated. This chapter brings questions of ethics and fairness to the foreground. It outlines how virtue-based ethics (to doing the right thing) can complement more normative as well as consequence-based ethical approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anscombe, E. 1958. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 33: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baggini, J., and S. Fosl. 2007. The ethics toolkit. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J. 2018. The people vs tech. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. 1972. The Bent Twig: A note on nationalism. Foreign Affairs 51 (1): 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———., edited by Hardy H (1991) The crooked timber of humanity. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridle, J. 2018. New dark age. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro, R. 1974. Power broker. New York: Alfred A Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero. 2008. On obligations De Officiis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, S. 2017. Just culture. 3rd ed. London: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobel, J.P. 1999. Public integrity. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. 2018. The democracy index. Economist Intelligence Unit, www.economist.com

  • Edmondson, A. 2019. The fearless organisation. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grube, D. 2019. Megaphone bureaucracy. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. 2015. The 15 diseases of leadership according to pope Francis. Harvard Business Review, April 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberts, L. W. J. C., and Hoekstra, A. (Eds.) (2016). Integrity management in the public sector: The Dutch approach. The Hague: BIOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberts, L. 2018. Integrity: What it is and why it is important. Public Integrity 20 (suppl 1): S18–S32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1477404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, I. 2008. How to make good decisions and be right every time. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. 2014. Greek and Roman political ideas. London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. 1997. Knights, knaves or pawns? Human behaviour and social policy. Journal of Social Policy 26 (2): 149–169. Cambridge University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. 2011. The prince. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1981. After virtue. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J. 1788. The Federalist No 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, K. 2015. The quest for a moral compass: A global history of ethics. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, A., and E. Brynjolfsson. 2017. Machine, platform, crowd. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 2005. Crooked timber or bent twig: Isaiah Berlin’s nationalism. Political Studies 53 (1): 100–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, R. 2019. The Mueller report. London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., and Z. Zhu. 2012. Pragmatic strategy: Eastern wisdom, global success. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 1986. The fragility of goodness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. interview. In A world of ideas, ed. B. Moyers, 448. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, J., and D. Cocking. 2001. Virtue ethics and professional roles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, B. 2018. Empathy, ethics and efficiency. In Reimagining the public service workforce, ed. H. Dickinson et al. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, M. 2018. On the future. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. 2011. The quality of government: Corruption, social trust and inequality in international perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, D. 2018. How democracy ends. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, Judith. 1984. Bad characters for good liberals. In Ordinary vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. D. 2018. The truth about ‘the arc of the moral universe’. Huffington Post, 18 January 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramakrishnan, S. 2019. Can you believe your eyes? How deepfakes are coming for politics. Financial Times, 24 October 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. 2018. Stand out of our light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. 2019. Surveillance Capitalism. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry Quirk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Quirk, B. (2020). Being Good to Do Good: Public Servants and Public Ethics in the Twenty-First Century. In: Sullivan, H., Dickinson, H., Henderson, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_61-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_61-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03008-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03008-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics