Abstract
Governments design and deliver public infrastructure, public services, and regulatory frameworks to meet the current and future challenges facing their societies and their economies. Their general aim is to do good. But to do good, they have to be good.
They need sufficient capacity to act where public action is required. And they need to possess genuine capability so as to generate and realize positive change for the better. Good intentions and ample resources are not enough to deliver good outcomes. Citizen-focused and evidence-based approach to policy making can ensure that the right public policies are being pursued. But are they being implemented in the right way, and are politicians and public servants doing the right things to assure cost-effective and trustworthy government action?
Public ethics and citizens’ experience of fairness lie at the heart of good public services. And it is why the ethical behavior of politicians, senior public executives, and mainstream public servants is central in shaping the overall ability of governments to do good.
Considerations as to what constitutes ethical behavior (both positive and negative) will vary across nations and cultures. But despite this, there are widely accepted practices of good behaviors that need to be encouraged and bad behaviors that need to be eliminated. This chapter brings questions of ethics and fairness to the foreground. It outlines how virtue-based ethics (to doing the right thing) can complement more normative as well as consequence-based ethical approaches.
References
Anscombe, E. 1958. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 33: 1–19.
Baggini, J., and S. Fosl. 2007. The ethics toolkit. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bartlett, J. 2018. The people vs tech. London: Penguin.
Berlin, I. 1972. The Bent Twig: A note on nationalism. Foreign Affairs 51 (1): 11–30.
———., edited by Hardy H (1991) The crooked timber of humanity. London: Pimlico.
Bridle, J. 2018. New dark age. London: Verso.
Caro, R. 1974. Power broker. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
Cicero. 2008. On obligations De Officiis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dekker, S. 2017. Just culture. 3rd ed. London: CRC Press.
Dobel, J.P. 1999. Public integrity. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Economist. 2018. The democracy index. Economist Intelligence Unit, www.economist.com
Edmondson, A. 2019. The fearless organisation. Hoboken: Wiley.
Grube, D. 2019. Megaphone bureaucracy. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
Hamel, G. 2015. The 15 diseases of leadership according to pope Francis. Harvard Business Review, April 2015.
Huberts, L. W. J. C., and Hoekstra, A. (Eds.) (2016). Integrity management in the public sector: The Dutch approach. The Hague: BIOS.
Huberts, L. 2018. Integrity: What it is and why it is important. Public Integrity 20 (suppl 1): S18–S32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1477404.
King, I. 2008. How to make good decisions and be right every time. London: Bloomsbury.
Lane, M. 2014. Greek and Roman political ideas. London: Pelican.
Le Grand, J. 1997. Knights, knaves or pawns? Human behaviour and social policy. Journal of Social Policy 26 (2): 149–169. Cambridge University Press.
Machiavelli, N. 2011. The prince. New York: Random House.
MacIntyre, A. 1981. After virtue. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.
Madison, J. 1788. The Federalist No 51.
Malik, K. 2015. The quest for a moral compass: A global history of ethics. London: Atlantic Books.
McAfee, A., and E. Brynjolfsson. 2017. Machine, platform, crowd. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Miller, D. 2005. Crooked timber or bent twig: Isaiah Berlin’s nationalism. Political Studies 53 (1): 100–123.
Mueller, R. 2019. The Mueller report. London: Simon & Schuster.
Nonaka, I., and Z. Zhu. 2012. Pragmatic strategy: Eastern wisdom, global success. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. 1986. The fragility of goodness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1989. interview. In A world of ideas, ed. B. Moyers, 448. New York: Doubleday.
Oakley, J., and D. Cocking. 2001. Virtue ethics and professional roles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, B. 2018. Empathy, ethics and efficiency. In Reimagining the public service workforce, ed. H. Dickinson et al. Singapore: Springer.
Rees, M. 2018. On the future. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rothstein, B. 2011. The quality of government: Corruption, social trust and inequality in international perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Runciman, D. 2018. How democracy ends. London: Profile.
Sen, A. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shklar, Judith. 1984. Bad characters for good liberals. In Ordinary vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smith, M. D. 2018. The truth about ‘the arc of the moral universe’. Huffington Post, 18 January 2018.
Venkataramakrishnan, S. 2019. Can you believe your eyes? How deepfakes are coming for politics. Financial Times, 24 October 2019.
Williams, J. 2018. Stand out of our light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zuboff, S. 2019. Surveillance Capitalism. London: Profile.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Quirk, B. (2020). Being Good to Do Good: Public Servants and Public Ethics in the Twenty-First Century. In: Sullivan, H., Dickinson, H., Henderson, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_61-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_61-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03008-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03008-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences