Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Typology of the Latin American Civil Servant: Patronage Appointee, Technocrat, Loyalist, or Careerist

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant

Abstract

Latin American (LA) civil services have traditionally been characterized by their rapid personnel rotation, unstructured careers schemes, and networks that are primarily based on patronage loyalties. During the twentieth century, the civil service in Latin America has undergone several stages of reform as a result of structural adjustment programs and conditional loans from international institutions, which, together with the regions’ own political development, have created a complex system of hybrid forms of civil service. The coexistence of highly technocratic institutions (“isles of efficiency”) and more patronage-oriented institutions is therefore common in Latin America. Furthermore, these institutions also produce different types of civil servants ranging from technocratic to political.

This chapter provides a general overview of the theoretical discussions concerning the study of civil services in LA by comparing approaches focusing on “state capacity” or “administrative tradition.” According to the state capacity approach, scholars have largely explained the role and functions of civil servants based on their capacities and their relative political autonomy, while the administrative tradition approach emphasizes their access to state positions and whether or not they are meritocratic. Based on these discussions, this chapter proposes a fourfold categorization of civil servants (patronage appointees, technocrats, partisan loyalists, and careerists) that coexist in LA bureaucracies. The chapter concludes by briefly summarizing the central ideas of the civil servant typology and the potential challenges with regard to their application in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrucio, F., P. Pedroti, and M.V. Po. 2010. A formacao da burocracia brasileira: a trajetoria e o significado das reformas administrativas. In Burocracia e política no Brasil. Desafios para a orden democrática no seculo XXI, ed. M. Loureiro, L. Abrucio, and P. Silva, 27–72. Brasil: FGV Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, C.R., and C. Navarro. 2011. Administrative tradition and reforms in Spain: Adaptation versus innovation. Public Administration 89 (3): 783–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, D., J. Møller, and S.E. Skaaning. 2014. The state-democracy nexus: Conceptual distinctions, theoretical perspectives, and comparative approaches. Democratization 21 (7): 1203–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baekgaard, M., and B. George. 2018. Equal access to the top? Representative bureaucracy and politicians’ recruitment preferences for top administrative staff. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (4): 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balarin, M. 2008. Promoting educational reforms in weak states: The case of radical policy discontinuity in Peru. Globalisation, Societies and Education 6 (2): 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersch, K., S. Praça, and M.M. Taylor. 2017. State capacity, bureaucratic politicization, and corruption in the Brazilian state. Governance 30 (1): 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, D.W., and A.A. Goldsmith. 2004. Good governance, clientelism, and patrimonialism: New perspectives on old problems. International Public Management Journal 7: 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerlo, M., and A. Pérez-Liñán. 2015. Minister turnover, critical events, and the electoral calendar in presidential democracies. The Journal of Politics 77 (3): 608–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárdenas, M. 2010. State Capacity in Latin America. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/04_latin_america_cardenas.pdf

  • Carta Iberoamericana de la Gestion Publica. 2002. V Conferencia Iberoamericana de Ministros de Administracion Publica y Reforma del Estado. Bolivia, 14–15 November 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cejudo, G.M. 2015. Public administration in Latin America: Adaptation to a new democratic reality. In The international handbook of public administration and governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centeno, M.A., and P. Silva, eds. 2016. The politics of expertise in Latin America. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoph, J.B. 1992. The remaking of British administrative culture: why Whitehall can’t go home again. Administration & Society, 24 (2): 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cingolani, L., K. Thomsson, and D. de Crombrugghe. 2015. Minding weber more than ever? The impacts of state capacity and bureaucratic autonomy on development goals. World Development 72: 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.L. 1023 Ley que crea la autoridad del servicio civil, rectora del sistema administrativo de gestión de recursos humanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. 016-2016-EF que modifica el Reglamento de la Ley N 29806, Ley que regula la contratación de personal altamente calificado en el Sector Público y dicta otras disposiciones, aprobado por Decreto Supremo 016-2012-EF. Available at: https://elperuano.pe/normaselperuano/2017/02/11/1484961-1/1484961-1.htm

  • Dargent, E. 2015. Technocracy and democracy in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargent, E. 2018. The rise and fall of the Instituto Nacional de Planificación in Peru, 1962–1992: Exploring the limits of state capacity building in weak states. State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain: The Rise and Fall of the Developmental State 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargent, E., and M. Urteaga. 2016. Respuesta estatal por presiones externas: los determinantes del fortalecimiento estatal frente al boom del oro en el Perú (2004–2015). Revista de ciencia política (Santiago) 36 (3): 655–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, J.I., ed. 2010. Technopols: Freeing politics and markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, G. 2001. The civil Service in Latin-America and the Caribbean: Situation and future challenges: The Caribbean perspective. Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussauge-Laguna, M.I. 2012. The neglected dimension: Bringing time back into cross-national policy transfer studies. Policy Studies 33 (6): 567–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. 2019. Merit reform in Latin America. In Handbook of comparative and development public administration, 711–723. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 2013. What is governance? Working paper 314. Center for global development. Accessed: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/159182/1426906_file_Fukuyama_What_Is_Governance.pdf

  • Geddes, B. 1990. Building “state” autonomy in Brazil, 1930–1964. Comparative Politics 22 (2): 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gledhill, J. 2017. Corruption as the Mirror of the state in Latin America. In Between morality and the law, 163–188. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, E.G. 2010. Situación del régimen de carrera administrativa en Colombia. Prolegómenos, 13 (25): 147–163

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Bustamante, B. 2019. Civil service models in Latin America. In. A.Farazmand, ed. (2019) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy and Governance. New York: Springer. Online: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319-20928-9_2699

  • Gortazar, N. 2019a. Eduardo Bolsonaro, um aspirante a embaixador abençoado por Trump e por seu pai | Internacional | EL PAÍS Brasil. https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2019/07/22/internacional/1563822867_797050.html

  • ———. 2019b. Bolsonaro nega nepotismo para indicar Eduardo à embaixada dos EUA | Brasil | EL PAÍS Brasil. https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2019/07/12/politica/1562955318_313619.html

  • Grassi, D., and V. Memoli. 2016. Political determinants of state capacity in Latin America. World Development 88: 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, Merilee S. 2010. Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing career civil Service Systems in Latin America. HKS faculty research working paper series, RWP10-025, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K.M. 2004. Characterizing American public administration: The concept of administrative culture. International Journal of Public Sector Management 17 (3): 234–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K., O. Dwivedi, and S. Mcinnes. 1999. Bureaucracy and the alternatives in world perspective. (S. McInnes, Ed.). Canadian Public Administration 44 (4): 490–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, K. 2018. Peasants, experts, clients, and soybeans: The fixing of Paraguay’s civil service. Current Anthropology 59 (S18): S171–S181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huneeus, C. 1998. Technocrats and politicians in the democratic politics of Argentina (1983–95). In The Politics of expertise in Latin America, 177–195. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Rio Branco. 2019. EDITAL No 1, DE 5 DE JULHO DE 2019 CONCURSO DE ADMISSÃO À CARREIRA DE DIPLOMATA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., J.M. Forman, and K. Bliss. 2012. Police reform in Latin America – implications for U.S. policy. https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/120228_Johnson_PoliceReform_web.pdf

  • Joignant, A. 2011. The politics of technopols: Resources, political competence and collective leadership in Chile, 1990–2010. Journal of Latin American Studies 43 (3): 517–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafuente, M., and Evelyn Bolanos. 2018. Building state capacity in the Caribbean: A baseline report of the civil service. Interamerican Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/building-state-capacity-caribbean-baseline-report-civil-service

  • Ley 61 de 1987 por la cual se expiden normas sobre la Carrera Administrativa y se dictan otras disposiciones. Online: http://suin.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?id=1614188

  • Longo Martínez, F., and M.B. Iacoviello. 2010. Metodología para el Diagnóstico de la Implantación de la Carta Iberoamericana de la Función Pública.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, J.R.F. 2015. Servicio Civil de Carrera en Colombia: perspectivas y resultados de la profesionalización de la Función Pública. Summa Iuris 3 (1): 87–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S., and A. Pérez-Liñán. 2015. Cross-currents in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. 1984. The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology/Archives européennes de sociologie 25 (2): 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinela, F. 2016. Direito Administrativo. Saraiva 10: 47. https://doi.org/10.15601/2237-955x/dih.v4n4p47-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, S. 2001. New public management: Just a “fashlon model on the runway”? Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique Du Canada 44 (4): 490–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K.J., and E.K. Melton. 2014. Bureaucratic representation and responsiveness. In The Oxford handbook of racial and ethnic politics in the United States. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merino, Mauricio. 1996. De la lealtad individual a la responsabilidad pública. Revista de Administración Pública 91: 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, M.V. 2002. Political bias in policy convergence: Privatization choices in Latin America. World Politics 54 (4): 462–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nef, J. 1998. Administrative culture in Latin America: Historical and structural outline. Africa 28 (2): 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. ublic administration and public sector reform in Latin America. In The handbook of public administration, 323–336. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olavarría-Gambi, M., and A. Dockendorff. 2016. Implementing meritocracy in senior public administration: The dilemma for Chilean politicians. Public Organization Review 16 (4): 561–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oszlak, O. 1997. The argentine civil service: An unfinished search for identity. Research in Public Administration 5: 267–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. El servicio civil en América Latina y el Caribe: situación y retos futuros. Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. From smaller to better government: The challenge of the second and third generations of state reform. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior 9 (3): 408–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, M., and B.G. Peters. 2010. Administrative traditions in comparative perspective: Families, groups and hybrids. In Tradition and public administration, 19–30. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Salgado, I. 1997. El papel de la cooperación técnica internacional en el proceso de modernización del Estado y de la gestión pública.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B.M., and G.M. Silva. 2018. Technocrats’ compromises: Defining race and the struggle for equality in Brazil, 1970–2010. Journal of Latin American Studies 50 (1): 87–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, T.J. 1998. Brazilian politicians and neoliberalism: Mapping support for the Cardoso reforms, 1995–1997. Journal of interamerican studies and world affairs 40 (4): 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramió, C., and M. Salvador. 2008. Civil service reform in Latin America: External referents versus own capacities. Bulletin of Latin American Research 27 (4): 554–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, C., and F. Scrollini. 2013. Los nuevos acuerdos entre políticos y servidores públicos en la alta dirección pública en Chile y Uruguay. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 22 (1): 11–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, E.G. 2010. Situación del régimen de carrera administrativa en Colombia. Prolegómenos, 13(25):147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar-Morales, D. A. 2018. Sermons, carrots or sticks? Explaining successful policy implementation in a low performance institution. Journal of Education Policy, 33 (4): 457–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund, P.E. 1983. The rise and fall of the Chicago boys in Chile. SAIS Review 3 (2): 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, P. 1991. Technocrats and politics in Chile: From the Chicago boys to the CIEPLAN monks. Journal of Latin American Studies 23 (2): 385–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E.B. 2019. The state and capital in Chile: Business elites, technocrats, and market economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soifer, H.D. 2015. State building in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spink, P. 1999. Possibilities and political imperatives: Seventy years of administrative reform in Latin America. In Reforming the state: Managerial public administration in Latin America, ed. L.C.B. Pereira and P. Spink, 91–114. London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, J. 2018. Building state capacity in the Caribbean: The state of the civil Service in Jamaica. Interamerican Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/building-state-capacity-caribbean-state-civil-service-jamaica

  • Velarde, J.C.C., M. Lafuente, M. Sanginés, C. Schuster, K. Echebarría, F. Longo, … and M. Iacoviello. 2014. Serving citizens: A decade of civil service reforms in Latin America (2004–13). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellinga, M. 2018. The changing role of the state in Latin America. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, K. 2009. Bounded rationality and policy diffusion: Social sector reform in Latin America. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. 1995. Political Organizations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hertie School of Governance, Berlin, Germany

    Diego A. Salazar-Morales

  2. King’s Business School, King’s College London, London, UK

    Lucas Amaral Lauriano

Authors
  1. Diego A. Salazar-Morales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucas Amaral Lauriano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego A. Salazar-Morales .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia

    Helen Sullivan

  2. UNSW Australia, Campbell, ACT, Australia

    Helen Dickinson

  3. College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

    Hayley Henderson

Section Editor information

  1. Hertie School of Governance, Berlin, Deutschland

    Gerhard Hammerschmid

  2. Hertie School of Government, Berlin, Germany

    Jessica Breaugh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Salazar-Morales, D.A., Lauriano, L.A. (2020). A Typology of the Latin American Civil Servant: Patronage Appointee, Technocrat, Loyalist, or Careerist. In: Sullivan, H., Dickinson, H., Henderson, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_71-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_71-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03008-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03008-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation