Advertisement

Economic Aspects of Wind Turbine Aerodynamics

  • Panagiotis ChaviaropoulosEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Wind turbines are aerodynamically driven machines. The energy produced is chiefly associated with the efficiency of their rotors to convert the kinetic energy of wind to mechanical power. Still, mechanical power must be transformed to electrical through a drivetrain, and the whole system should be kept in place through a support structure. The selection of the proper architecture and the design of these three main subsystems (rotor, drive train, support structure) allow for much freedom, but at the end of the day, it is driven by economical aspects. The optimal turbine design for a given site (onshore/offshore) with known external conditions is the one which can produce electricity in the lowest possible cost, usually expressed through a metric called levelized cost of electricity (LCoE). We acknowledge the fact that since a few years, wind farms are subjected to variable market price mechanisms, and the value of the produced electricity is depending on the market specifics, possibly leading to a different optimum than the one suggested by minimum LCoE. As, however, LCoE remains a pure metric for technology assessment, the goal of this chapter is to make the connection between LCoE and technological selections and design aspects, with focus on rotor aerodynamics. Mastering this connection allows for better understanding the critical areas where the emphasis should be placed for improving cost-efficiency of wind turbine designs.

Keywords

LCoE reduction Wind turbine design Turbine architecture upscaling Rotor aerodynamics 

References

  1. Bortolotti P, Bottasso CL, Croce A (2016) Combined preliminary-detailed design of wind turbines. Wind Energy Sci 1:71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BVG associates (2012) Offshore Wind Cost Reduction Pathways. Technology work streamGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaviaropoulos PK (2007) Similarity rules for W/T up-scaling. UpWind Report, WP 1B4Google Scholar
  4. Chaviaropoulos T, Beurskens HJM, Voutsinas S (2013) Moving towards large(r) high speed rotors – is that a good idea? Proceedings of scientific track, EWEA 2013 Conference, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaviaropoulos PK, Sieros G (2014) Design of Low Induction Rotors for use in large offshore wind farms. In: Proceedings of scientific track, EWEA 2014, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaviaropoulos PK, Sieros G, Prospathopoulos JM, Diakakis K, Voutsinas SG (2015) Design and CFD-based Performance Verification of a Family of Low-Lift Airfoils. In: Proceedings of EWEA 2015, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Dykes K, Meadows R, Felker F, Graf P, Hand M, Lunacek M, Michalakes J, Moriarty P, Musial W, Veers P (2011) Applications of systems engineering to the research, design, and development of wind energy systems, p 92; NREL Rep TP-5000-52616Google Scholar
  8. Fingersh LJ, Hand MM, Laxson AS (2006) Wind turbine design cost and scaling model. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, GoldenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Göçmen T, Laan PVD, Réthoré P-E, Diaz AP, Larsen GC, Ott S (2016) Wind turbine wake models developed at the technical university of Denmark: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:752–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IRENA (2018) “Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2017”, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu DhabiGoogle Scholar
  11. Key Performance Indicators for the European Wind Industrial Initiative, SETIS-TPWIND, Version: 3. November (2013)Google Scholar
  12. LCICG (2012) Technology Innovation Needs Assessment (TINA), Offshore Wind Power, Summary ReportGoogle Scholar
  13. Politis ES, Chaviaropoulos PK (2008) Integrated wind turbine design, UpWind project (SES6-CT-2005-019945), Workshop on cost functions stuttgartGoogle Scholar
  14. Poore R, Walford C (2008) Development of an operations and maintenance cost model to identify cost of energy savings for low wind speed turbines. NREL/SR-500-40581Google Scholar
  15. Renewable energy (2013) mammoth wind turbines will cut offshore costs by 40% in 7 years, developer says. Available at http://www.eenews.net/stories/1059978057
  16. Renewable UK (2011) Offshore Wind, Forecasts of future costs and benefits. www.RenewableUK.com
  17. RolandBerger (2013) Offshore Wind Towards 2020; On the pathway to cost competitive-ness, Apr 2013. http://www.rolandberger.com/media/publications/2013-05-06-rbsc-pub-Offshore_wind_toward_2020.html
  18. Schmidt J, Stoevesandt B (2015) The impact of wake models on wind farm layout. J Phys Conf Ser 625:012040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sieros G, Chaviaropoulos PK (2010) Aspects of up-scaling beyond similarity. In: Voutsinas S, Chaviaropoulos PK (eds) Proceedings of ‘the science of making torque from wind’ conference, Heraklion, 28-30/6/2010Google Scholar
  20. Sieros G, Chaviaropoulos P, Sorensen JD, Bulder BH, Jamieson P (2012) Up-scaling wind turbines: theoretical and practical aspects and their impact on the cost of energy. Wind Energy 15(1):3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. The Crown Estate (2012) Offshore Wind Cost Reduction. Pathways studyGoogle Scholar
  22. Zahle F, Tibaldi C, Verelst DR, Bak C, Bitche R, Blasques JPAA (2015) Aero-Elastic Optimization of a 10MW Wind Turbine. In: Proceedings of the 33rd wind energy symposium, Kissimmee, FloridaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.iWind Renewables P.C.AthensGreece

Section editors and affiliations

  • Yuping Sun
    • 1
  1. 1.Goldwind AmericasChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations