Advertisement

A Group Multicriteria Approach

  • Guy Camilleri
  • Pascale ZaratéEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Group decision support systems are developed to support a group engaged in decision-making process. These decision-making processes can also be seen from a multicriteria perspective. We present in this chapter group support system called GRoUp Support (GRUS) based on a multicriteria paradigm. The GRUS system has been tested and used in several contexts. Some experiments are conducted in a European project called RUC-APS and some other in a French national project called VGI4Bio, and finally we conducted some experiments in three different countries with Master and PhD students.

Keywords

Group multicriteria decision analysis (G-MCDA) Group decision support systems (GDSS) Group support systems (GSS) GRoUp Support (GRUS) Group decision-making 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Authors of this publication acknowledge the contribution of the Project 691249, RUC-APS: Enhancing and implementing knowledge-based ICT solutions within high-risk and uncertain conditions for agriculture production systems (www.ruc-aps.eu), funded by the European Union under their funding Scheme H2020-MSCA-RISE-2015

This work is partially supported by the project ANR-17-CE04-0012 VGI4bio.

References

  1. Adla A, Zarate P, Soubie JL (2011) A proposal of toolkit for GDSS facilitators. Gr Decis Negot.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-010-9204-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alabdulkarim A, Macaulay LA (2005) Facilitation of e-meetings: state-of-the-art review. In: Proceedings. The 2005 IEEE international conference on e-technology, e-commerce and e-service (EEE). pp 728–735Google Scholar
  3. Bostrom R, Anson R, Clawson et al (1993) Group facilitation and group support systems. J Manag Inf Syst. Jessup L, Valacich J (eds), pp 146–168Google Scholar
  4. Bottero M, Ferretti V, Figueira JR et al (2018) On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application. Eur J Oper Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs RO, De Vreede GJ (2009) Thinklets: building blocks for concerted collaboration. University of Nebraska, Center for Collaboration ScienceGoogle Scholar
  6. Briggs RO, De Vreede GJ, Nunamaker JF, Tobey D (2001) ThinkLets: achieving predictable, repeatable patterns of group interaction with Group Support Systems (GSS). In: Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2001.926238
  7. Briggs RO, De Vreede GJ, Nunamaker JF (2003) Collaboration engineering with thinklets to pursue sustained success with group support systems. J Manag Inf Syst 19:31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camilleri G, Zarate P, Viguie P (2011) A timing management banner for supporting group decision making. In: Proceedings of the 2011 15th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design, CSCWD 2011Google Scholar
  9. Choquet G (1987) Theory of capacities. Ann Inst Fourier.  https://doi.org/10.5802/aif.53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Silva Oliveira LG, de Almeida-Filho AT (2018) A new PROMETHEE-based approach applied within a framework for conflict analysis in evidence theory integrating three conflict measures. Expert Syst Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Vreede G-J (2014) Two case studies of achieving repeatable team performance through collaboration engineering. MIS Q Exec 13:115–129Google Scholar
  12. de Vreede G-J, Briggs R (2018) Collaboration engineering: reflections on 15 years of research & practice. In Proceedings of the 51st annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2018Google Scholar
  13. De Vreede GJ, Vogel D, Kolfschoten G, Wien J (2003) Fifteen years of GSS in the field: a comparison across time and national boundaries. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2003Google Scholar
  14. Den Hengst M, Adkins M (2007) Which collaboration patterns are most challenging: a global survey of facilitators. In: Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciencesGoogle Scholar
  15. DeSanctis G, Gallupe RB (1987) A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Manag Sci 33:589–609.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.5.589 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dong Y, Zha Q, Zhang H, Kou G, Fujita H, Chiclana Fr, Herrera-Viedma E (2018). Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges. In Knowledge-Based Systems, 165:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grigera J, Sakka A, Bosetti G et al (2019) UX challenges in GDSS: an experience report. In: Submitted to GDN conferenceGoogle Scholar
  18. Helquist JH, Kruse J, Adkins M (2008) Participant-driven collaborative convergence. In: Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciencesGoogle Scholar
  19. Limayem M, DeSanctis G (2000) Providing decisional guidance for multicriteria decision making in groups. Inf Syst Res.  https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.386.11874 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Limayem M, Khalifa M, Ma S (2006) Human versus automated facilitation in the GDSS context. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cyberneticsGoogle Scholar
  21. Mareschal B, Brans JP, Macharis C (1998) The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure: a PROMETHEE-GAIA based procedure for group decision support. J Decis Syst 7:283–307Google Scholar
  22. Marttunen M, Lienert J, Belton V (2017) Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: a literature review of method combinations. Eur J Oper Res 263:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nunamaker JF, Briggs RO, Mittleman DD et al (1996) Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings. J Manag Inf Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenhead J, Mingers J (2001) Rational analysis for problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Wiley, Chichester/LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwarz R (2002) 5 Ground Rules for Effective Groups. In The Skilled Facilitator (pp120–160). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Sibertin-Blanc C, Zaraté P (2014) Cooperative decision making: a methodology based on collective preferences aggregation. In: Lecture notes in business information processingGoogle Scholar
  27. Sprague RH, Carlson ED (1983) Building effective decision support systems. Inf Process Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(83)90011-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wong Z, Aiken M (2003) Automated facilitation of electronic meetings. Inf Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00042-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern.  https://doi.org/10.1109/21.87068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zahid MA, De Swart H (2015) The borda majority count. Inf Sci (Ny).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.10.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zaraté P, Konate J, Camilleri G (2013) Collaborative decision making tools: a comparative study based on functionalities (regular paper). In: Martinovski B (ed) Group decision and negotiation (GDN), pp 111–122.Google Scholar
  32. Zaraté P, Marc Kilgour D, Hipel K (2016) Private or common criteria in a multi-criteria group decision support system: an experiment. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and Lecture notes in bioinformatics)Google Scholar
  33. Zaraté P, Camilleri G, Kilgour M (2017) Multi-criteria group decision making with private and shared criteria an experiment (regular paper). In: Bajwa D, Koeszegi ST, Vetschera R (eds) Group decision and negotiation (GDN), pp 31–42.Google Scholar
  34. Zhao JL, Nunamaker JF, Briggs RO (2002) Intelligent workflow techniques for distributed group facilitation. In: Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciencesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRIT, Toulouse UniversitéToulouse Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations