Advertisement

Looking Back on a Framework for Thinking About Group Support Systems

  • Viktor DörflerEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter is an update to the thinking framework for Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) proposed by Colin Eden 30 years ago. As the source paper, this chapter is a personal take on the topic; however, it is a personal take rooted in substantial experience in the broad area of decision-making and modelling and in some specific narrow areas of decision support. There have been major developments in the broad context surrounding GDSS, including the improved understanding of decisions on the conceptual side, and many aspects of computer development, such as artificial intelligence and big data on the technical side. Considering the volume of these changes, it is surprising how much the observations, arguments, and conclusions offered in the source paper are still valid today. The most important component of any GDSS is still the facilitator, and the most valuable ingredients of the GDSS process are the participants’ intuitions, creativity, opinions, arguments, agendas, personalities, and networks. The outcome of the GDSS process is only valuable if it is politically feasible. Today we have a better understanding of transitional objects and their role in the GDSS process; their significance is the second after the facilitator. Artificial intelligence can be useful for GDSS in several different ways, but it cannot replace the facilitator.

Keywords

Political feasibility Transitional object Artificial intelligence Intuition Creativity Emotions 

References

  1. Ackermann F, Eden C (1994) Issues in computer and non-computer supported GDSSs. Decis Support Syst 12(4):381–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)90054-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackermann F, Eden C (2010) The role of group decision support systems: negotiating safe energy. In: Kilgour DM, Eden C (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Advances in group decision and negotiation. Springer, New York, pp 285–299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ackermann F, Eden C (2011a) Making strategy: mapping out strategic success. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackermann F, Eden C (2011b) Negotiation in strategy making teams: group support systems and the process of cognitive change. Group Decis Negot 20(3):293–314.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9133-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ackermann F, Eden C (2011c) Strategic management of stakeholders: theory and practice. Long Range Plan 44(3):179–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amabile TM (1983) The social theory of creativity. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  8. Ariely D (2009) Predictably irrational: the hidden forces that shape our decisions. HarperCollins Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Ariely D, Trower MR (2019) Amazing decisions: the illustrated guide to improving business deals and family meals. Hill & Wang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Baracskai Z, Dörfler V (2017) An essay concerning human decisions. Transdiscipl J Eng Sci 8:71–82.  https://doi.org/10.22545/2017/00088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron WB (1963) Informal sociology: a casual introduction to sociological thinking. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Checkland PB (1999) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Checkland PB, Scholes J (1999) Soft systems methodology in action. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  14. Damasio AR (1995) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Avon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Davenport TH (2018) The AI advantage: how to put the artificial intelligence revolution to work. Management on the cutting edge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davenport TH, Beck JC (2001) The attention economy: understanding the new currency of business. Harvard Business School Press, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Geus AP (1988) Planning as learning. Harv Bus Rev 66(2):70–74Google Scholar
  18. Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Dörfler V (forthcoming) Artificial intelligence. In: Runco MA, Pritzker SR (eds) Encyclopedia of creativity, 3rd edn. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  20. Dörfler V, Ackermann F (2012) Understanding intuition: the case for two forms of intuition. MLQ 43(5):545–564.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611434686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dörfler V, Eden C (2019) Understanding ‘expert’ scientists: implications for management and organization research. MLQ 50:534.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619866652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dörfler V, Stierand M (2017) The underpinnings of intuition. In: Liebowitz J, Paliszkiewicz J, Gołuchowski J (eds) Intuition, trust, and analytics. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dörfler V, Stierand M (2018) Understanding indwelling through studying intuitions of nobel laureates and top chefs. Paper presented at the AoM 2018: 78th annual meeting of the academy of management, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Dörfler V, Baracskai Z, Velencei J (2010) Understanding creativity. Trans Adv Res 6(2):18–26Google Scholar
  25. Eden C (1987) Problem solving or problem finishing? In: Jackson MC, Keys P (eds) New directions in management science. Gower, Aldershot, pp 97–107Google Scholar
  26. Eden C (1990) The unfolding nature of group decision support: two dimensions of skill. In: Eden C, Radford KJ (eds) Tackling strategic problems: the role of group decision support. SAGE, London, pp 48–52Google Scholar
  27. Eden C (1992a) A framework for thinking about group decision support systems (GDSS). Group Decis Negot 1(3):199–218.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eden C (1992b) Strategy development as a social process. J Manag Stud 29(6):799–812.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00690.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eden C, Ackermann F (1998) Making strategy: the journey of strategic management. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Eden C, Ackermann F (2001) SODA: the principles. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 21–41Google Scholar
  31. Eden C, Ackermann F (2009) SODA – journey making and mapping in practice. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 43–60Google Scholar
  32. Eden C, Ackermann F (2010) Decision making in groups: theory and practice. In: Nutt PC, Wilson D (eds) Handbook of decision making. Wiley-Blackwell, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  33. Eden C, Ackermann F, McKiernan P (2019) Stakeholders in strategy: their ‘invisible’ but significant presence. Paper presented at the AoM 2019: 79th annual meeting of the academy of management, Boston.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.10678abstractCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1998) The hidden traps in decision making. Harv Bus Rev 76(5):47–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Handy C (1991) The age of unreason: new thinking for a new world, 2nd edn. Arrow Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Healey MP, Hodgkinson GP (2017) Making strategy hot. Calif Manag Rev 59(3):109–134.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617712258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hickling A (1974) Managing decisions: the strategic choice approach. Mantec Publications, RugbyGoogle Scholar
  38. Hodgkinson G, Sadler-Smith E (2017) The dynamics of intuition and analysis in managerial and organizational decision making. Acad Manag Perspect.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hume D (1739) A treatise of human nature. Oxfor University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  40. Huxham C (1990) On trivialities in process. In: Eden C, Radford KJ (eds) Tackling strategic problems: the role of group decision support. SAGE, London, pp 162–168Google Scholar
  41. Iyengar SS (2011) The art of choosing: the decisions we make everyday – what they say about us and how we can improve them. Little, Brown Book Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Kahneman D, Klein G (2009) Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. Am Psychol 64(6):515–526.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (1991) Implementing global strategies: the role of procedural justice. Strateg Manag J 12(S1):125–143.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kvavilashvili L, Ellis J (2004) Ecological validity and twenty years of real-life/laboratory controversy in memory research: a critical (and historical) review. Hist Philos Psychol 6(1):59–80Google Scholar
  46. March JG (1991) How decisions happen in organizations. Hum Comput Interact 6(2):95–117.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0602_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martinovski B (2010) Emotion in negotiation. In: Kilgour DM, Eden C (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Advances in group decision and negotiation. Springer, New York, pp 65–86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martinovski B (2015) Emotion in group decision and negotiation. Advances in group decision and negotiation. Springer, Dordrecht.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9963-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mintzberg H, van der Heyden L (1999) Organigraphs: drawing how companies really work. Harv Bus Rev 77(5):87–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nunamaker JF, Applegate LM, Konsynski BR (1988) Computer-aided deliberation: model management and group decision support. Oper Res 36(6):826–848.  https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.36.6.826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pidd M (2017) Making an impact: in praise of small data and big thinking. Impact 3(1):11–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2058802X.2017.11964015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Polányi M (1962) Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Pyrko I, Dörfler V, Eden C (2017) Thinking together: what makes communities of practice work? Hum Relat 70(4):389–409.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716661040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pyrko I, Dörfler V, Eden C (2019) Communities of practice in landscapes of practice. MLQ 50(4):482–499.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619860854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simon HA (1947) Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organization, 1st edn. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Simon HA (1955) A Behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69(1):99–118.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol Rev 63(2):129–138.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Simon HA (1976) From substantive to procedural rationality. In: Latsis SJ (ed) Method and appraisal in economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simon HA (1977) The new science of management decision, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  60. Simon HA (1983) Reason in human affairs. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  61. Simon HA (1987) Making management decisions: the role of intuition and emotion. AME 1(1):57–64.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1987.4275905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sinclair M, Ashkanasy NM (2005) Intuition: myth or a decision-making tool? MLQ 36(3):353–370.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507605055351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stierand M, Dörfler V (2016) The role of intuition in the creative process of expert chefs. J Creat Behav 50(3):178–185.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stierand M, Dörfler V, MacBryde J (2014) Creativity and innovation in haute cuisine: towards a systemic model. Creat Innov Manag 23(1):15–28.  https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stierand M, Boje DM, Glăveanu VP, Dörfler V, Haley U, Feuls M (2019) Paradoxes of creativity: examining the creative process through an antenarrative lens. J Creat Behav 53(2):165–170.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thaler RH (2015) Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Velencei J, Baracskai Z, Dörfler V, Stierand M (2016) Supporting the competent practitioner: transdisciplinary coaching with a knowledge-based expert system. Int J Manag Sci Bus Adm 2(12):20–27.  https://doi.org/10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.212.1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weick KE (1979) The social psychology of organizing, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management Science DepartmentUniversity of Strathclyde Business SchoolGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations