Advertisement

Group Support Systems: Experiments with an Online System and Implications for Same-Time/Different-Places Working

  • Mike YearworthEmail author
  • Leroy White
Living reference work entry

Abstract

We present an analysis of the Group Explorer Group Support System (GSS) from the perspective of its implementation as technology that can support same-time/different-places group workshops. The purpose of the chapter is to report on our experiences with using a same-time/different-places GSS, introduce issues that arise from these experiences, and discuss future prospects. The chapter commences by reviewing our current understanding of GSS and how they support the use of distributed Problem Structuring Methods (PSMs) in both single-organization and multi-organization settings. The configuration and use of a cloud-based online version of the GSS is presented that highlights some of the key technological, organizational, and facilitation issues involved in supporting distributed PSM workshops. The future development of such online GSS is discussed with a particular focus on two emerging research questions: the future role of the facilitator in online GSS and the commonalities between online GSS and social media platforms as different-times/different-places group working, such as crowdsourcing, becomes prevalent in the context of increasing globalization and the ongoing decentralization of work environments.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the many colleagues and collaborators in the STEEP and REPLICATE projects who contributed feedback on the development of the MS-Azure cloud-based implementation of the Group Explorer GSS and its use in the online mode. This work was supported in part by (i) the EPSRC-funded Industrial Doctorate Centre in Systems (Grant EP/G037353/1); (ii) the Innovate UK/NERC project Healthy Resilient Cities: Building a Business Case for Adaptation (Grant NE/N007360/1); (iii) the EU FP7-ENERGY-SMARTCITIES-2012 (314277) project STEEP (Systems Thinking for Comprehensive City Efficient Energy Planning); and (iv) the EU H2020-SCC-2015 (691735) project REPLICATE (REnaissance of Places with Innovative Citizenship and TEchnology).

References

  1. Ackermann F (1996) Participants’ perceptions on the role of facilitators using group decision support systems. Group Decis Negot 5(1):93–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackermann F, Eden C (2001) SODA – journey making and mapping in practice. In: Mingers J, Rosenhead J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 43–60Google Scholar
  3. Ackermann F, Eden C (2005) Using causal mapping with group support systems to elicit an understanding of failure in complex projects: some implications for organizational research. Group Decis Negot 14(5):355–376.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-8917-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackermann F, Eden C (2010a) The role of group decision support systems: negotiating safe energy. In: Kilgour DM, Eden C (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, pp 285–299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ackermann F, Eden C (2010b) Strategic options development and analysis. In: Reynolds M, Holwell S (eds) Systems approaches to managing change: a practical guide. Springer, London, pp 135–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ackermann F, Eden C (2011) Making strategy: mapping out strategic success, 2nd edn. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Ackermann F, Franco LA, Gallupe B, Parent M (2005) GSS for multi-organizational collaboration: reflections on process and content. Group Decis Negot 14(4):307–331.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-0317-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ackermann F, Howick S, Quigley J, Walls L, Houghton T (2014) Systemic risk elicitation: using causal maps to engage stakeholders and build a comprehensive view of risks. Eur J Oper Res 238(1):290–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ackermann F, Yearworth M, White L (2018) Micro-processes in group decision and negotiation: practices and routines for supporting decision making. Group Decis Negot 27(5):709–713.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9590-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brabham DC (2013) Crowdsourcing. The MIT Press, Cambridge/LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brabham DC, Ribisl KM, Kirchner TR, Bernhardt JM (2014) Crowdsourcing applications for public health. Am J Prev Med 46(2):179–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryson JM, Anderson SR (2000) Applying large-group interaction methods in the planning and implementation of major change efforts. Public Adm Rev 60(2):143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burger K, White L, Yearworth M (2019) Developing a smart operational research with hybrid practice theories. Eur J Oper Res 277:1137–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed) Power, action, and belief: a new sociology of knowledge. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp 196–233Google Scholar
  15. Callon M, Rabeharisoa V (2003) Research “in the wild” and the shaping of new social identities. Technol Soc 25(2):193–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00021-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  17. Checkland P (1999) Systems thinking, systems practice: includes a 30-year retrospective. John Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  18. Checkland P, Scholes J (1999) Soft systems methodology in action: including a 30-year retrospective. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Eden C (1995) On evaluating the performance of ‘wide-band’ GDSS’s. Eur J Oper Res 81(2):302–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0241-OCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eden C, Ackermann F (2001) SODA – the principles. In: Mingers J, Rosenhead J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 21–41Google Scholar
  21. Eden C, Ackermann F (2018) Theory into practice, practice to theory: action research in method development. Eur J Oper Res 271(3):1145–1155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engel D, Woolley AW, Aggarwal I, Chabris CF, Takahashi M, Nemoto K, Kaiser C, Kim YJ, Malone TW (2015) Collective intelligence in computer-mediated collaboration emerges in different contexts and cultures. In: Paper presented at the 33rd annual CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fjermestad J, Hiltz SR (1998) An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results. J Manag Inf Syst 15(3):7–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franco LA (2008) Facilitating collaboration with problem structuring methods: a case study of an inter-organisational construction partnership. Group Decis Negot 17(4):267–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franco A (2013) Rethinking soft OR interventions: models as boundary objects. Eur J Oper Res 231(3):720–733.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franco LA (2014) Zooming in on problem structuring interventions: an affordance perspective. Paper presented at the 56th annual conference of the Operational Research Society, OR 2014Google Scholar
  27. Franco LA, Greiffenhagen C (2018) Making OR practice visible: using ethnomethodology to analyse facilitated modelling workshops. Eur J Oper Res 265(2):673–684.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Franco LA, Montibeller G (2010) Facilitated modelling in operational research. Eur J Oper Res 205(3):489–500.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Franco LA, Nielsen MF (2018) Examining group facilitation in situ: the use of formulations in facilitation practice. Group Decis Negot 27(5):735–756.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9577-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Freeman R, Yearworth M (2017) Climate change and cities: problem structuring methods and critical perspectives on low-carbon districts. Energy Res Soc Sci 25:48–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friend JK, Hickling A (1987) Planning under pressure: the strategic choice approach. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Friend JK, Hickling A (1997) Planning under pressure: the strategic choice approach, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Friend JK, Hickling A (2005) Planning under pressure: the strategic choice approach, 3rd edn. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Garfinkel H (1996) Ethnomethodology’s program. Soc Psychol Q 59(1):5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Herrera HJ, McCardle-Keurentjes MHF, Videira N (2016) Evaluating facilitated modelling processes and outcomes: an experiment comparing a single and a multimethod approach in group model building. Group Decis Negot 25(6):1277–1318.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9480-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heylighen F (2013) Distributed intelligence technologies: a survey of future applications and implications of the global brain. Global Brain Institute, working paper. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.310.7653&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 26th Feb 2019
  37. Hiltz SR, Dufner D, Fjermestad J, Kim Y, Ocker R, Rana A, Turoff M (1996) Distributed group support systems: theory development and experimentation. In: Olson GM, Smith JB, Malone TW (eds) Coordination theory and collaboration technology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  38. Jain R (2010) Investigation of governance mechanisms for crowdsourcing initiatives. Paper presented at the 16th Americas conference on information systems 2010, AMCIS 2010, LimaGoogle Scholar
  39. Johansen R (1991) Groupware: future directions and wild cards. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 1(2):219–227.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10919399109540160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim Y, Hiltz SR, Turoff M (2002) Coordination structures and system restrictiveness in distributed group support systems. Group Decis Negot 11(5):379–404.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020492305910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Open University Press, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  42. Laughlin PR (2011) Group problem solving. Princeton University Press, Princeton/WoodstockCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis LF (2010) Group support systems: overview and guided tour. In: Kilgour DM, Eden C (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, pp 249–268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Limayem M (2006) Human versus automated facilitation in the GSS context. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 37:156–166.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1161345.1161363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lykourentzou I, Vergados DJ, Papadaki K, Naudet Y (2013) Guided crowdsourcing for collective work coordination in corporate environments. Paper presented at the computational collective intelligence. Technologies and applications, Berlin/HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Midgley G, Ochoa-Arias AE (2004) An introduction to community OR. In: Midgley G, Ochoa-Arias AE (eds) Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development. Kluwer, New York, pp 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Midgley G, Johnson MP, Chichirau G (2018) What is community operational research? Eur J Oper Res 268(3):771–783.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mittleman DD, Briggs RO, Nunamaker JF (2000) Best practices in facilitating virtual meetings: some notes from initial experiences. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal 2:6–15Google Scholar
  49. Morton A, Ackermann F, Belton V (2007) Problem structuring without workshops? Experiences with distributed interaction within a PSM process. J Oper Res Soc 58(5):547–556.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nunamaker JF, Briggs RO, Mittleman DD, Vogel DR, Balthazard PA (1996) Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings. J Manag Inf Syst 13(3):163–207.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2008) Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad Manag Ann 2:433–474.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paul S, Samarah IM, Seetharaman P, Mykytyn PP Jr (2004) An empirical investigation of collaborative conflict management style in group support system-based global virtual teams. J Manag Inf Syst 21(3):185–222.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2004.11045809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richardson GP, Andersen DF (2010) Systems thinking, mapping, and modeling in group decision and negotiation. In: Kilgour DM, Eden C (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, pp 313–324.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Romano NC, Nunamaker JF, Briggs RO, Mittleman DD (1999, 5–8 Jan 1999) Distributed GSS facilitation and participation: field action research. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of full papers.  https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772737
  55. Rouwette EAJA, Vennix JAM, Thijssen CM (2000) Group model building: a decision room approach. Simul Gaming 31(3):359–379.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104687810003100303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rouwette E, Bastings I, Blokker H (2011) A comparison of group model building and strategic options development and analysis. Group Decis Negot 20(6):781–803.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-010-9207-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sterman J (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. In: Boston. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Tomasello M, Rakoczy H (2003) What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind and Language 18(2):121–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tung LL, Turban E (1998) A proposed research framework for distributed group support systems. Decis Support Syst 23(2):175–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00040-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turoff M (1975) The policy Delphi. In: Linstone HA, Turoff M (eds) Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  61. Turoff M, Hiltz SR, Bahgat ANF, Rana AR (1993) Distributed group support systems. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 17(4):399–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weisbord MR, Janoff S (2010) Future search: getting the whole system in the room for vision, commitment, and action, 3rd edn. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  63. White L (2002) Connection matters: exploring the implications of social capital and social networks for social policy. Syst Res Behav Sci 19(3):255–269.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. White L (2009) Understanding problem structuring methods interventions. Eur J Oper Res 199(3):823–833.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wong Z, Aiken M (2003) Automated facilitation of electronic meetings. Inf Manag 41(2):125–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00042-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yearworth M, White L (2014) The non-codified use of problem structuring methods and the need for a generic constitutive definition. Eur J Oper Res 237(3):932–945.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yearworth M, White L (2017) Demystifying facilitation: a new approach to investigating the role of facilitation in group decision support processes. In: Bajwa D, Koeszegi ST, Vetschera R (eds) 16th international conference on group decision and negotiation, GDN 2016, Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 274. Springer, pp 69–86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52624-9_6Google Scholar
  68. Yearworth M, White L (2018) Spontaneous emergence of community OR: self-initiating, self-organising problem structuring mediated by social media. Eur J Oper Res 268(3):809–824.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.01.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhao Y, Zhu Q (2014) Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: current status and future direction. Inf Syst Front 16(3):417–434.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-012-9350-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  2. 2.Warwick Business SchoolUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations