Skip to main content

Group Decision Support Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation

Abstract

This chapter comprises an account of three significant recent contributions made by the Zaragoza Multicriteria Decision-Making Group to the field of group decision and negotiation using the analytic hierarchy process. After a short overview of AHP and its role in group decision support, it goes on to include (i) a review of the role of consistency in group decision-making and the proposal of consistency consensus matrices; (ii) an outline of the procedure aggregation of individual preference structures that provides collective valuations of the alternatives in a group decision problem; and (iii) a brief examination of the Bayesian approach to group decision-making using the analytic hierarchy process and the connection to prioritization, consistency, and compatibility. The chapter is complemented by a discussion of cognitive orientation and its implementation in group decision processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguarón J, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2003) The geometric consistency index. Approximated thresholds. Eur J Oper Res 147(1):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2003) Consistency stability intervals for a judgement in AHP-decision support systems. Eur J Oper Res 145(2):382–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2016) Precise consistency consensus matrix in an AHP-group decision making local context. Ann Oper Res 245(1):245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Turón A (2019) AHP-group decision making based on consistency. Mathematics 7(3):242; https://doi.org/10.3390/math7030242, Open Access

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuzarra A, Moreno-Jimenez JM, Salvador M (2007) A Bayesian prioritization procedure for AHP-group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 182:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuzarra A, Moreno-Jimenez JM, Salvador M (2010) Consensus building in AHP-group decision making: a Bayesian approach. Oper Res 58(6):1755–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuzarra A, Gargallo P, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Salvador M (2013) Influence, relevance and discordance of criteria in AHP-global Bayesian prioritization. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 12(4):837–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuzarra A, Gargallo P, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Salvador M (2019) Homogeneous groups of actors in an AHP-local decision making context: a Bayesian approach. Mathematics 7:294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbel A, Vargas LG (1993) Preference simulation and preference programming: robustness issues in priority derivation. Eur J Oper Res 69:300–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basak I (1998) Probabilistic judgements specified partially in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 108:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo JM, Smith AFM (1994) Bayesian theory. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bozóki S, Fülöp J, Rónyai L (2010) On optimal completion of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. Math Comput Model 52(1–2):318–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson N, Joseph A (1999) Generating consensus priority point vectors: algorithmic goal programming approach. Comput Oper Res 26(6):637–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capra F (1996) The web of life. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Fan ZP, Ma J, Zeng S (2011) A hybrid grouping genetic algorithm for reviewer group construction problem. Expert Syst Appl 38(3):2401–2411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford G, Williams CA (1985) A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices. J Math Psychol 29(4):387–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bono E (1970) Lateral thinking. Penguin Books, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Zhang G, Hong WH, Xu Y (2010) Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decis Support Syst 49:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2000) Reciprocal distributions in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 123(1):154–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2007) Aggregation of individual preference structures. Group Decis Negot 16(4):287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar MT, Aguarón J, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2004) A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure. Eur J Oper Res 153(2):318–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar MT, Aguarón J, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2015) Some extensions of the precise consistency consensus matrix. Decis Support Syst 74:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman E, Peniwati K (1998) Aggregating individual judgements and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 108:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gargallo P, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Salvador M (2007) AHP-group decision making: a Bayesian approach based on mixtures. Group Decis Negot 16(6):485–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groselj P, Stirn LZ (2012) Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 223(2):417–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn ED (2003) Decision making with uncertain judgements: a stochastic formulation of the analytic hierarchy process. Decis Sci 34(3):443–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen RP (2003) Decisionarium-aiding decisions, negotiating and collecting opinions on the web. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 12(2–3):101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iz PH, Gardiner LR (1993) Analysis of multiple criteria decision support systems for cooperative groups. Group Decis Negot 2:61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Straus and Giroux Farrar, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C (2007) A revised framework for deriving preferences values from pairwise comparison matrices. Eur J Oper Res 176(2):1145–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migers J (2003) A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science methods. J Oper Res Soc 54(6):559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov L (2004) Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method. Comput Oper Res 31(2):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Vargas LG (1993) A probabilistic study of preference structures in the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgments. Math Comput Model 17(4–5):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Vargas LG (2018) Cognitive multicriteria decision making and the legacy of the analytic hierarchy process. Estudios de Economía Aplicada 36(1):67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Turón A (1999) The multicriteria procedural rationality on SISDEMA. Eur J Oper Res 119(2):388–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Aguarón J, Raluy A, Turón A (2005) A spreadsheet module for consistent AHP-consensus building. Group Decis Negot 14(2):89–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Aguarón J, Escobar MT (2008) The core of consistency in AHP-group decision making. Group Decis Negot 17:249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Cardeñosa J, Gallardo C, de la Villa-Moreno MA (2014) A new e-learning tool for cognitive democracies in the Knowledge Society. Comput Hum Behav 30:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Gargallo P, Salvador M, Altuzarra A (2016) Systemic decision making: a Bayesian approach in AHP. Ann Oper Res 245(1):261–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R (1997) Stochastic decision making using multiplicative AHP. Eur J Oper Res 97:543–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert CP, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Forman EH (1993) The Hierarchon: a dictionary of hierarchies. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Peniwati K (2008) Group decision making: drawing out and reconciling differences. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador M, Altuzarra A, Gargallo P, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2015) A Bayesian approach for maximising inner compatibility in AHP-systemic decision making. Group Decis Negot 24(4):655–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH (2017) Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turón A, Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2019) A decision support system and some visualisation tools for AHP-GDM. Int J Decis Support Syst Technol 11(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Thaler RH (1990) Anomalies: preference reversals. J Econ Perspect 4(2):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Honert RC (1998) Stochastic group preference modelling in the multiplicative AHP: a model of group consensus. Eur J Oper Res 110(1):99–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Honert RC, Lootsma FA (2000) Assessing the quality of negotiated proposals using the REMBRANDT system. Eur J Oper Res 120(1):162–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11:199–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations. Decis Support Syst 52:757–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2000) On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. Eur J Oper Res 126:683–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Lai KK (2011) A distance-based group decision-making methodology for multiperson multi-criteria emergency decision support. Decis Support Syst 51:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF (2014) Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf Fusion 17:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José María Moreno-Jiménez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Moreno-Jiménez, J.M., Aguarón, J., Escobar, M.T., Salvador, M. (2020). Group Decision Support Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Kilgour, D., Eden, C. (eds) Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12051-1_51-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12051-1_51-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12051-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12051-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics