Skip to main content

Subject/Object

Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 381 Accesses

Abstract

The pair of concepts subject/object derives from the Greek hupokeímenon and antikeímenon and from medieval usages of the verbs subiicio and obiicio, which actually mean the opposite of their post-Cartesian usages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Literature

  • Aquinas. Summa theologica

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. Analytica posteriora

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. De anima

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. Ethica nicomachea

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. Metaphysica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averroes (1562–1574) Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois Commentariis, Venice

    Google Scholar 

  • Beurhaus F (1588) De P. Rami dialecticae…quae paedagogiae logicae pars secunda, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgersdijk F (1626) Institutionum logicarum libri duo, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (1637) Discours de la méthode, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Goclenius R (1613) Lexicon philosophicum, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel GWF (1801) Differenzschrift, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Keckermann B (1614) Operum omnium quae extant, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini C (1597) Compendium metaphysicum ad libros metaphysicorum archiphilosophi Aristotelis aliorumque metaphysicorum commentaria rectius cognoscenda, traditum in illustri Julia a Cornelio Martini Andvverpio, logices ibidem professore acutissimo, Ms. Helmstedt

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini C (1604a) Disputationum metaphysicarum prima, Helmstedt

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini C (1604b) Disputationum metaphysicarum secunda de subiecto metaphysicae, Helmstedt

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini C (1605) Metaphysica commentatio. In: Bartholin K (ed) Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini C (1607) Disputationum metaphysicarum quarta de primo cognitionis principio, tam incomplexo quam complexo, Helmstedt

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini C (1622) Metaphysica commentatio, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Melanchthon P (1520) Compendiaria dialectices ratio, Wittenberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothold A (1597) De Rameae institutionis principiis et natura logicae, Lemgo

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothold A (1598) Diatribe philosophica qua doctrina de definitione et divisione dialecticae, de notionibus primis et secundis, de argumentis inventionis et praedicabilibus, de analysi logica Rameorum, de metaphysica et praedicamentis ad Philippi et Rami documenta revocatur ac judicatur, Lemgo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus P (1570) Institutionum dialecticarum libri tres. In: Audomarus Talaeus (ed) Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus P (1572) Dialecticae libri duo, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluter S (1610) Anatomia logicae aristotelicae sive syncrisis logica, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza de B (1677) Opera posthuma, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabarella J (1597) Opera logica. In: Hawenreuther JL (ed) Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Ashworth EJ (1974) Language and logic in the post-medieval period. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth EJ (1997) Petrus Fonseca on objective concepts and the analogy of Being. In: Easton PE (ed) Logic and the workings of the mind. Ridgeview Publishing Company, Atascadero, pp 47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan L (1981) Obiectum: notes on the invention of a word. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 56:37–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton PE (1997) Preface. In: Easton PE (ed) Logic and the workings of the mind. Ridgeview Publishing Company, Atascadero, pp i–vi

    Google Scholar 

  • Eucken R (1879) Geschichte der philosophischen Terminologie im Umriss. Veit, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka J (1975) Knowledge and the known. Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Homann K (1969) Zum Begriff ‘Subjektivität’ bis 1802. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 11:184–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine N (1988) Epistemology of the sciences. In: Schmitt CB et al (eds) The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 685–711

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karskens K et al (1998) Subjekt/Objekt; subjektiv/objektiv. In: Ritter J, Gründer K (eds) Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol 10. Schwabe, Basel, pp 401–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Kible B et al (1998) Subjekt. In: Ritter J, Gründer K (eds) Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol 10. Schwabe, Basel, pp 373–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P (1997) Kant on logic and self-consciousness. In: Easton PE (ed) Logic and the workings of the mind. Ridgeview Publishing Company, Atascadero, pp 175–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobusch T (1984) Objekt. In: Ritter J, Gründer K (eds) Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol 6. Schwabe, Basel, pp 1026–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn M (1997) The Wolffian background of Kant’s transcendental deduction. In: Easton PE (ed) Logic and the workings of the mind. Ridgeview Publishing Company, Atascadero, pp 229–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignucci M (1993) The Stoic themata. In: Döring K, Ebert T (eds) Dialektiker and Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläufer. Steiner, Stuttgart, pp 217–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugnai M (1979) Intensionale Kontexte und termini reduplicativi in der Grammatica rationis von Leibniz. Studia leibnitiana Sonderheft 8:82–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi B (1951) Soggetto e oggetto del conoscere nella filosofia antica e medievale. Universale di Roma, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuchelmans G (1973) Theories of the proposition: ancient and medieval conceptions on the bearers of truth and falsity. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuchelmans G (1980) Late scholastic and humanist theories of the proposition. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuchelmans G (1982) Judgment and proposition: from Descartes to Kant. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin RH (1988) Theory of knowledge. In: Schmitt CB et al (eds) The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 688–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo R (1992) Ramismus II. In: Ritter J, Gründer K (eds) Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol 8. Schwabe, Basel, pp 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo R (1998) Res considerata and modus considerandi rem: Averroes, Aquinas, Jacopo Zabarella, and Cornelius Martini on Reduplication. Medioevo 24:251–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo R (1999) Thema I. In: Ritter J, Gründer K (eds) Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol 11. Schwabe, Basel, pp 1059–1061

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo R (2002) Ramus and other Renaissance philosophers on subjectivity. Topoi 22:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo R (2012) Adversus Ramistas: Kontroversen über die Natur der Logik am Ende der Renaissance. Schwabe, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse W (1960) Die Entwicklung der Dialektik bei Petrus Ramus. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42:36–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse W (1963) Zur Vorgeschichte der cartesischen Methodenlehre. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 45:268–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse W (1964) Logik der Neuzeit: 1500–1640. F. Frommann, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson F (1997) Berkeley’s metaphysics and Ramist logic. In: Easton PE (ed) Logic and the workings of the mind. Ridgeview Publishing, Atascadero, pp 109–136

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Pozzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pozzo, R. (2014). Subject/Object. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_241-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_241-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Subject/Object, Renaissance Concept of
    Published:
    16 October 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_241-2

  2. Original

    Subject/Object
    Published:
    22 May 2014

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_241-1