Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Signatura Rerum Theory

  • Yohei KikuchiharaEmail author
  • Hiro Hirai
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_405-1

Abstract

Natural things sometimes resemble each other. From antiquity to today, either in the East or the West, such similarity is often considered to be a hidden key toward important knowledge for human beings. To recognize this similarity needs a sort of index, which measures resemblance between things. A general index can be the external figure of natural things. This is the foundation of the theory called “signature/sign of things” (signatura rerum). According to a typical understanding of the sixteenth century, the invisible internal essence or force of natural things was visibly coined on their external figure as a sign. Human beings could decipher such signs by analogy and approach to the universal knowledge of nature or even to the will of God who engraved these signs in nature. The doctrine of signatura rerum was a manifestation of this way of reasoning and approach to nature. French philosopher Michel Foucault (1926–1984) addressed it in Les mots et les choses (The Order of Things), Chapter 2, and made it well known (Foucault. Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Gallimard, Paris, 1966).

Keywords

Analogical Reasoning Bodily Organ Natural Thing External Figure Wild Olive 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Primary Literature

  1. Böhme J (1621) De signatura rerum. [s. l.]Google Scholar
  2. Croll O (1609) Basilica chymica. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  3. Della Porta G (1588) Phytognomonica. NaplesGoogle Scholar
  4. Du Chesne J (1603) De simplicium signaturis externis tractatus. Saint-GervaisGoogle Scholar
  5. Fabricius W (1653) De signaturis plantarum. NurembergGoogle Scholar
  6. Paracelsus (1922–1933) Sämtliche Werke, Abteilung 1. Oldenbourg, Munich/BerlinGoogle Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Arber A (1919/1986) Herbals, their origin and evolution: a chapter in the history of botany, 1470–1670. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bianchi ML (1987) Signatura rerum: segni, magia e conoscenza da Paracelso a Leibniz. Edizioni dell’Ateneo, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bono JJ (1995) The word of God and the languages of man: interpreting nature in early modern science and medicine. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  4. Foucault M (1966) Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Hirai H (2014) Images, Talismans and medicine in Jacques Gaffarel’s Unheard-of Curiosities. In Hirai H (ed) Jacques Gaffarel between magic and science. Serra, RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Kikuchihara Y (2013) Paracelsus and the Magical Renaissance. Keiso Publishing, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  7. Müller-Jahncke W-D (1984) Ordnung durch Signatur: Analogiedenken und Arzneischatz im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Deutsche Apotheker Zeitung 124:2184–2189Google Scholar
  8. Müller-Jahncke W-D (1985) Astrologisch-Magische Theorie und Praxis in der Heilkunde der frühen Neuzei. Steiner, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  9. Thorndike L (1923–1958) A history of magic and experimental science. The Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyushu Institute of TechnologyFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Center for the History of Philosophy and ScienceRadboud Universiteit NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands