Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Descartes, René

Born: 31 March 1596 (La Haye en Touraine, France)
Died: 11 February 1650 (Stockholm, Sweden)
  • Fabrizio BaldassarriEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_645-1
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

Scholars generally consider René Descartes to be the father of early modern philosophy insofar he rejected scholasticism, Aristotelianism, but also Renaissance philosophies and grounded a new system of knowledge whose roots lie solely in the mind and not in previous assumptions. This defines a modern self that achieves the knowledge of nature and shapes the modern universe. In the Discours de la Méthode (1637) and the Meditationes de prima philosophia (1641), after rejecting earlier education, doctrines, and scientiæ, Descartes isolates the powers of the mind (i.e., clear and distinct ideas) as the beginning of any certainty. Yet, having considered Descartes’ system as dismissing all doctrines and beliefs, in this entry I will first examine some relations between the French philosopher and those contexts and then discuss the novelties of his system. After a short biography, in the second section, I will briefly explore the interrelations between Descartes and Renaissance scholars, whom he reproached for their precipitate conclusions. Third, I will unearth his criticism of Aristotelian-scholastic philosophy (which he reproached for its preconceptions), while highlighting his attention to a few Aristotelian texts. Fourth, I will investigate a few innovative aspects of his methodology; this consists of novel combination of intellectual cognition and experimentation. As a result, Descartes’ entire natural philosophy consists of a theoretical framework that defines the principles of knowledge and the architecture of science, while the body of all disciplines and the knowledge of particular issues are methodologically and experientially constructed. Despite several limitations, Descartes’ system is remarkably innovative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Primary Literature

  1. Descartes, René. 1964–1974. Œuvres complètes de Descartes, ed. Ch. Adam and P. Tannery, Vol. 14. Paris: Vrin. [AT in the text followed by the number of the volume and of the page].Google Scholar
  2. Descartes, René. 1985–1991. The philosophical writings of Descartes, ed. J. Cottingham et al., Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CSM or CSMK in the text].Google Scholar
  3. Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. 2007. The correspondence, ed. L. Shapiro. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. [Shapiro in the text].Google Scholar
  4. Villiers, Nicolas de, sieur de Chandoux. 2013. Lettres sur l’or potable, ed. par S. Matton. Paris-Milan: Séha-Archè. [Matton in the text].Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Agostini, Igor. 2010. L’idea di Dio in Descartes. Dalle Meditationes alle Responsiones. Milano-Firenze: Le Monnier-Mondadori.Google Scholar
  2. Agostini, Igor. 2019. Descartes’ philosophical theology. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 209–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Agostini, Igor, et al. Forthcoming. Nouvel index Scolastico-Cartésien. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
  4. Alban-Zapata, Gabriel. 2016. Light and man: An anomaly in the treatise on light? In Descartes’ treatise on man and its reception, ed. Delphine Antoine-Mahut and Stephen Gaukroger. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Antoine-Mahut, Delphine. 2016. The story of L’Homme. In Descartes’ treatise on man and its reception, ed. Delphine Antoine-Mahut and Stephen Gaukroger. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antoine-Mahut, Delphine, and Stephen Gaukroger, eds. 2016. Descartes’ treatise on man and its reception. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Ariew, Roger. 1999. Descartes and the late scholastics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ariew, Roger. 2011. Descartes among the scholastics. Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ariew, Roger. 2019. What Descartes read: His intellectual background. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 25–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Aucante, Vincent. 2006. La philosophie médicale de Descartes. Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2014. Descartes e il Principe. Il declino della politica nell’ordine della ragione. Intersezioni 34: 361–380.Google Scholar
  12. Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2015. Né l’alchimia, né la chimica. Minerali, pietre, metalli: Descartes, la meccanica dei corpi naturali e la medicina. In Storia e fondamenti della Chimica, ed. M. Taddia, 243–252. Rome: Accademia dei XL.Google Scholar
  13. Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2016. Libri inutili, compendi e libri ‘primarii’. Descartes tra lettura e scrittura della filosofia. Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 12: 324–342.Google Scholar
  14. Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2017. ‘[P]er experientiam scilicet vel deductione’: Descartes’s early 1630s battle for Scientia. Historia Philosophica 15: 115–123.Google Scholar
  15. Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2018. Seeking intellectual evidence in sciences: The role of botany in Descartes’ therapeutics. In Evidence in the age of the new sciences, ed. J. Lancaster and R. Raiswell, 47–75. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2019. The mechanical life of plants: Descartes on botany. British Journal for the History of Science 51: 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Baldassarri, Fabrizio. Forthcoming. Medicina e fisiologia in René Descartes, filosofo del poële e del tavolo anatomico. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
  18. Belgioioso, Giulia. 1990. Aristotele degli Essais. In Descartes: Il Metodo e i saggi, ed. G. Belgioioso et al. Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
  19. Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie. 1990. Le principe de vie chez Descartes. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  20. Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie. 2000. Cartesian physiology. In Descartes’ natural philosophy, ed. Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, and John Sutton, 349–382. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Bos, Erik-Jan. 2002. The correspondence between Descartes and Henricus Regius. Ph.D dissertation, Zeno, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  22. Bos, Erik-Jan, and Theo Verbeek. 2013. Conceiving the invisible. The role of observation and experiment in Descartes’s correspondence, 1630–1650. In Communicating observations in early modern letters (1500–1675). Epistolography and epistemology in the age of the scientific revolution, ed. D. van Miert, 161–177. London-Turin: The Warburg Institute-Nino Aragno Editore.Google Scholar
  23. Buning, Robin. 2013. Henricus Reneri (1593–1639). Descartes’ quartermaster in Aristotelian territory. Ph.D dissertation, Zeno, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  24. Clarke, Desmond. 2006. Descartes: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. De Buzon, Friedrich. 2019. The compendium musicae and Descartes’s aesthetics. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 255–269. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fabbri, Natacha. 2008. De l’hutilité de l’harmonie. In Filosofia, scienza e musica in Mersenne, Descartes e Galileo. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
  27. Faye, Emmanuel. 1999a. Descartes et les philosophes français de la Renaissance. L’Enseignement philosophique 49: 27–71.Google Scholar
  28. Faye, Emmanuel, ed. 1999b. Descartes et la Renaissance. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
  29. Faye, Emamnuel. 2016. Descartes, the humanist, and the perfection of the human being. In Early modern philosophers and the renaissance legacy, ed. C. Muratori and G. Paganini, 155–168. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gadoffre, G. 1987. La chronologie des six parties. In Le Discours et sa méthode, ed. N. Grimaldi and J.-L. Marion, 19–40. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  31. Garber, Daniel. 1988. Descartes, the Aristotelians, and the revolution that did not happen in 1637. The Monist 71 (4): 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ metaphysical physics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gaukroger, Stephen, John Schuster, and John Sutton, eds. 2000. Descartes’ natural philosophy. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Gilson, Etienne. 1913. Index Scolastico-Cartésien. Paris.Google Scholar
  35. Gouhier, Henri. 1979 [1958]. Les premières pensées de Descartes, Contribution à l’histoire de l’Anti-Renaissance. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  36. Hattab, Helen. 2009. Descartes on forms and mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Joly, Bernard. 2013. Descartes et la chimie. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  38. Jorgensen, Larry M. 2012. Descartes on music: Between the ancients and the aestheticians. British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (4): 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kambouchner, Denis. 2019. Descartes and the passions. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 193–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Manning, Gideon. 2013. Descartes’ healthy machines and the human exception. In The mechanization of natural philosophy, ed. D. Garber and S. Roux, 237–262. Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Manning, Gideon. 2019. Descartes and medicine. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 157–177. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Marion, Jean-Luc. 1975. Sur l’ontologie grise de Descartes. Science cartésienne et savoir aristotélicien dans les Regulae. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  43. Maronne, Sébastien. 2019. Descartes’s mathematics. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 138–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mehl, Édouard. 2019. Descartes en Allemagne, 1619–1620. Le context allemande de l’élaboration de la science cartésienne. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  45. Meschini, Franco-Aurelio. 2013. Materiali per una storia della medicina cartesiana. Dottrine, testi, contesti e lessico. Udine: Mimesis.Google Scholar
  46. Nadler, Steven, et al. 2019. The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nolan, Lawrence. 2019. Descartes’s metaphysics. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 89–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Richard, Arthur. (2007) Beeckman, Descartes and the Force of Motion. Journal of the History of philosophy 45: 1–28.Google Scholar
  49. Rodis-Lewis, Genevieve. 1971. L’Œuvre de Descartes. Vol. 2. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  50. Scribano, Emanuela. 1997. Guida alla lettura delle Meditazioni metafisiche di Descartes. Roma: Laterza.Google Scholar
  51. van Berkel, Klaas. 2013. Isaac Beeckman on matter and motion: Mechanical philosophy in the making. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  52. van Ruler, Han. 2019. Philosopher defying the philosophers: Descartes’s life and works. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 3–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Verbeek, Theo. 1988. La Querelle d’Utrecht. Paris: Les Nouvelles Lettres.Google Scholar
  54. Verbeek, Theo. 2000. The invention of nature: Descartes and Regius. In Descartes’ natural philosophy, ed. Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, and John Sutton, 149–166. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Verbeek, Theo. 2015. Etudier l’histoire du cartésianism néerlandais. In Les Pays-Bas aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Nouveaux regards, ed. D. Antoine-Mahut and C. Secretan, 51–64. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICUB-HumanitiesUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania

Section editors and affiliations

  • Violaine Giacomotto-Charra
    • 1
  • Marco Sgarbi
    • 2
  1. 1.Université Bordeaux MontaignePessacFrance
  2. 2.University Ca' Foscari VeniceVeniceItaly