Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy pp 1–10Cite as

Descartes, René

Born: 31 March 1596 (La Haye en Touraine, France)

Died: 11 February 1650 (Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

  • 110 Accesses

Abstract

Scholars generally consider René Descartes to be the father of early modern philosophy insofar he rejected scholasticism, Aristotelianism, but also Renaissance philosophies and grounded a new system of knowledge whose roots lie solely in the mind and not in previous assumptions. This defines a modern self that achieves the knowledge of nature and shapes the modern universe. In the Discours de la Méthode (1637) and the Meditationes de prima philosophia (1641), after rejecting earlier education, doctrines, and scientiæ, Descartes isolates the powers of the mind (i.e., clear and distinct ideas) as the beginning of any certainty. Yet, having considered Descartes’ system as dismissing all doctrines and beliefs, in this entry I will first examine some relations between the French philosopher and those contexts and then discuss the novelties of his system. After a short biography, in the second section, I will briefly explore the interrelations between Descartes and Renaissance scholars, whom he reproached for their precipitate conclusions. Third, I will unearth his criticism of Aristotelian-scholastic philosophy (which he reproached for its preconceptions), while highlighting his attention to a few Aristotelian texts. Fourth, I will investigate a few innovative aspects of his methodology; this consists of novel combination of intellectual cognition and experimentation. As a result, Descartes’ entire natural philosophy consists of a theoretical framework that defines the principles of knowledge and the architecture of science, while the body of all disciplines and the knowledge of particular issues are methodologically and experientially constructed. Despite several limitations, Descartes’ system is remarkably innovative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

Primary Literature

  • Descartes, René. 1964–1974. Œuvres complètes de Descartes, ed. Ch. Adam and P. Tannery, Vol. 14. Paris: Vrin. [AT in the text followed by the number of the volume and of the page].

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. 1985–1991. The philosophical writings of Descartes, ed. J. Cottingham et al., Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CSM or CSMK in the text].

    Google Scholar 

  • Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. 2007. The correspondence, ed. L. Shapiro. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. [Shapiro in the text].

    Google Scholar 

  • Villiers, Nicolas de, sieur de Chandoux. 2013. Lettres sur l’or potable, ed. par S. Matton. Paris-Milan: Séha-Archè. [Matton in the text].

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Agostini, Igor. 2010. L’idea di Dio in Descartes. Dalle Meditationes alle Responsiones. Milano-Firenze: Le Monnier-Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agostini, Igor. 2019. Descartes’ philosophical theology. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 209–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agostini, Igor, et al. Forthcoming. Nouvel index Scolastico-Cartésien. Paris, Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alban-Zapata, Gabriel. 2016. Light and man: An anomaly in the treatise on light? In Descartes’ treatise on man and its reception, ed. Delphine Antoine-Mahut and Stephen Gaukroger. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoine-Mahut, Delphine. 2016. The story of L’Homme. In Descartes’ treatise on man and its reception, ed. Delphine Antoine-Mahut and Stephen Gaukroger. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Antoine-Mahut, Delphine, and Stephen Gaukroger, eds. 2016. Descartes’ treatise on man and its reception. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariew, Roger. 1999. Descartes and the late scholastics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariew, Roger. 2011. Descartes among the scholastics. Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ariew, Roger. 2019. What Descartes read: His intellectual background. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 25–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aucante, Vincent. 2006. La philosophie médicale de Descartes. Paris: PUF.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2014. Descartes e il Principe. Il declino della politica nell’ordine della ragione. Intersezioni 34: 361–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2015. Né l’alchimia, né la chimica. Minerali, pietre, metalli: Descartes, la meccanica dei corpi naturali e la medicina. In Storia e fondamenti della Chimica, ed. M. Taddia, 243–252. Rome: Accademia dei XL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2016. Libri inutili, compendi e libri ‘primarii’. Descartes tra lettura e scrittura della filosofia. Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 12: 324–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2017. ‘[P]er experientiam scilicet vel deductione’: Descartes’s early 1630s battle for Scientia. Historia Philosophica 15: 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2018. Seeking intellectual evidence in sciences: The role of botany in Descartes’ therapeutics. In Evidence in the age of the new sciences, ed. J. Lancaster and R. Raiswell, 47–75. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri, Fabrizio. 2019. The mechanical life of plants: Descartes on botany. British Journal for the History of Science 51: 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri, Fabrizio. Forthcoming. Medicina e fisiologia in René Descartes, filosofo del poële e del tavolo anatomico. Roma: Aracne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgioioso, Giulia. 1990. Aristotele degli Essais. In Descartes: Il Metodo e i saggi, ed. G. Belgioioso et al. Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie. 1990. Le principe de vie chez Descartes. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie. 2000. Cartesian physiology. In Descartes’ natural philosophy, ed. Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, and John Sutton, 349–382. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, Erik-Jan. 2002. The correspondence between Descartes and Henricus Regius. Ph.D dissertation, Zeno, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, Erik-Jan, and Theo Verbeek. 2013. Conceiving the invisible. The role of observation and experiment in Descartes’s correspondence, 1630–1650. In Communicating observations in early modern letters (1500–1675). Epistolography and epistemology in the age of the scientific revolution, ed. D. van Miert, 161–177. London-Turin: The Warburg Institute-Nino Aragno Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buning, Robin. 2013. Henricus Reneri (1593–1639). Descartes’ quartermaster in Aristotelian territory. Ph.D dissertation, Zeno, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Desmond. 2006. Descartes: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Buzon, Friedrich. 2019. The compendium musicae and Descartes’s aesthetics. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 255–269. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbri, Natacha. 2008. De l’hutilité de l’harmonie. In Filosofia, scienza e musica in Mersenne, Descartes e Galileo. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faye, Emmanuel. 1999a. Descartes et les philosophes français de la Renaissance. L’Enseignement philosophique 49: 27–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faye, Emmanuel, ed. 1999b. Descartes et la Renaissance. Paris: Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faye, Emamnuel. 2016. Descartes, the humanist, and the perfection of the human being. In Early modern philosophers and the renaissance legacy, ed. C. Muratori and G. Paganini, 155–168. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gadoffre, G. 1987. La chronologie des six parties. In Le Discours et sa méthode, ed. N. Grimaldi and J.-L. Marion, 19–40. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, Daniel. 1988. Descartes, the Aristotelians, and the revolution that did not happen in 1637. The Monist 71 (4): 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ metaphysical physics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger, Stephen, John Schuster, and John Sutton, eds. 2000. Descartes’ natural philosophy. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, Etienne. 1913. Index Scolastico-Cartésien. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouhier, Henri. 1979 [1958]. Les premières pensées de Descartes, Contribution à l’histoire de l’Anti-Renaissance. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattab, Helen. 2009. Descartes on forms and mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joly, Bernard. 2013. Descartes et la chimie. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, Larry M. 2012. Descartes on music: Between the ancients and the aestheticians. British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (4): 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kambouchner, Denis. 2019. Descartes and the passions. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 193–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Gideon. 2013. Descartes’ healthy machines and the human exception. In The mechanization of natural philosophy, ed. D. Garber and S. Roux, 237–262. Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Gideon. 2019. Descartes and medicine. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 157–177. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion, Jean-Luc. 1975. Sur l’ontologie grise de Descartes. Science cartésienne et savoir aristotélicien dans les Regulae. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maronne, Sébastien. 2019. Descartes’s mathematics. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 138–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehl, Édouard. 2019. Descartes en Allemagne, 1619–1620. Le context allemande de l’élaboration de la science cartésienne. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meschini, Franco-Aurelio. 2013. Materiali per una storia della medicina cartesiana. Dottrine, testi, contesti e lessico. Udine: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, Steven, et al. 2019. The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, Lawrence. 2019. Descartes’s metaphysics. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 89–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, Arthur. (2007) Beeckman, Descartes and the Force of Motion. Journal of the History of philosophy 45: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodis-Lewis, Genevieve. 1971. L’Œuvre de Descartes. Vol. 2. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribano, Emanuela. 1997. Guida alla lettura delle Meditazioni metafisiche di Descartes. Roma: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Berkel, Klaas. 2013. Isaac Beeckman on matter and motion: Mechanical philosophy in the making. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ruler, Han. 2019. Philosopher defying the philosophers: Descartes’s life and works. In The Oxford handbook to René Descartes and Cartesianism, ed. Steven Nadler et al., 3–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, Theo. 1988. La Querelle d’Utrecht. Paris: Les Nouvelles Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, Theo. 2000. The invention of nature: Descartes and Regius. In Descartes’ natural philosophy, ed. Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, and John Sutton, 149–166. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, Theo. 2015. Etudier l’histoire du cartésianism néerlandais. In Les Pays-Bas aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Nouveaux regards, ed. D. Antoine-Mahut and C. Secretan, 51–64. Paris: Champion.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICUB-Humanities, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

    Fabrizio Baldassarri

Authors
  1. Fabrizio Baldassarri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Baldassarri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Philosophy a. Cultural Heritage, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia Dept. of Philosophy a. Cultural Heritage, Venezia, Italy

    Marco Sgarbi

Section Editor information

  1. Université Bordeaux Montaigne, Pessac, France

    Violaine Giacomotto-Charra

  2. University Ca' Foscari Venice, Venice, Italy

    Marco Sgarbi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Baldassarri, F. (2020). Descartes, René. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_645-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_645-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation