Skip to main content

Courts and Courtiers in the Renaissance

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

Courts were the center of political and cultural life in the Renaissance. A longstanding sociological theory sets the origins of our modern concept of civilized behavior in the Renaissance courts. Differentiating themselves from medieval courts by abandoning itinerancy and becoming more and more stable, Renaissance courts assumed a fixed, enclosed, and elitist structure, with the prince or lord at its center and a complex entourage of courtiers employed in different tasks surrounding him. At the same time, courts were places of unprecedented social mobility, where men of humble origins and great ambition could strive to obtain success and fame. In addition, they were important venues for the distribution of patronage: princes invested in writers and artists who could bring prestige to their court and make it outshine any rivals. Renaissance courts are also of paramount importance for gender studies. The courtly environment saw examples of powerful and influential females, who challenged the still existing stereotypes of women’s weakness and inferiority to men. Finally, the court was one of the main topics of Renaissance satiric writings, which offered a completely different picture from the image of splendor and magnificence that the courtly environment tried to present, depicting courts as overrun by hideous vices such as envy, flattery, and ruthless competition for success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Literature

  • Castiglione, Baldassar. 2000. Il Libro del cortegiano, ed. A. Quondam. Milan: Garzanti. English edition: Castiglione, Baldesar. 2002. The Book of the Courtier. The Singleton Translation, ed. D. Javitch (trans. Singleton, C.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducci, Lorenzo. 1601. Arte Aulica di Lorenzo Ducci. Nella quale s’insegna il modo, che deve tenere il Cortigiano per divenire possessore della gratia del suo Principe. Ferrara: appresso Vittorio Baldini. English edition: Ducci, Lorenzo. 1607. Ars Aulica, or the Courtiers Arte. Ed. trans. E. Blount. London: Melch. Bradwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasco, Annibal. 2010. Ragionamento a Donna Lavinia sua figliuola, ed. H. Sanson. In Letteratura Italiana Antica 11: 61–140. English edition: Guasco, Annibal. 2003. Discourse to Lady Lavinia His Daughter. Ed. trans. P. Osborn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolomini, Enea Silvio. 1928. In Aeneae Silvii De curialium miseriis espistola, ed. Wilfred P. Mustard. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasso, Torquato. 1973. Il Malpiglio: A Dialogue on the Court (Il Malpiglio overo de la corte). Ed. trans. Dain A. Trafton, 152–191. Hanover: Dartmouth College in conjunction with English Literary Renaissance.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Anglo, S. 2005. Machiavelli: The first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burckhardt, J. 1990. The civilization of the renaissance in Italy. London/New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. 1995. The fortunes of the courtier: The European reception of Castiglione’s Cortegiano. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, V. 2016. The Italian renaissance. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, A.G. 1977. The courts of Europe. Politics, patronage and royalty, 1400–1800. New York: Greenwich House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. 1978. The civilizing process, vol. I: The history of manners. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. 1982. The civilizing process, vol. II: State formation and civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. 1983. The court society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, C.S. 1985. The origins of courtliness. Civilizing trends and the formation of courtly ideals, 923–1210. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.J. 2004. Myths of renaissance individualism. Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martines, L. 1979. Power and imagination. City–States in renaissance Italy. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateer, D., ed. 2000. Courts, patrons and poets. New Haven/London: Yale University in Association with The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchembled, R. 2002. Manners, courts, and civility. In A companion to the worlds of the renaissance, ed. G. Ruggiero, 156–172. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaglione, A. 1991. Knights at court. Courtliness, chivalry, and courtesy from Ottonian Germany to the Italian renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. 2009. Dissimulation and the culture of secrecy in early modern Europe. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Ugolini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ugolini, P. (2018). Courts and Courtiers in the Renaissance. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_668-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_668-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics