Skip to main content

Averroism, Renaissance

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

Averroes (Ibn Rushd) exerted a profound impact on Renaissance philosophy, primarily, although not exclusively, through his commentaries on Aristotle. Renaissance scholars translated and conducted significant editorial work on his writings, which were frequently printed in the sixteenth century. The commentaries formed the basis for countless philosophical interpretations and disputes, but the most historically prominent were those related to his psychology. Averroes proposed that the material intellect is one in number, a thesis referred to as the unicity of the intellect or monopsychism. In the years around 1500, many, in particularly northern Italian, philosophers found Averroes’ interpretation of the soul philosophically convincing, even if they recognized its lack of conformity to Christianity. In the same years, ecclesiastical censures were promulgated that forbade the promotion of the unicity of the intellect. Nevertheless, philosophers continued to rely on his commentaries until the last decades of the sixteenth century. Thus, Averroes had a mixed reputation. While many university professors commended his subtlety as a commentator, humanists criticized his work for its supposed impiety and poor Latin, and many Thomist theologians considered his works a threat to religious orthodoxy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bianchi, L. 2008. Pour une histoire de la “double vérité”. Paris: J. Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenet, J.-B. 2003. Transferts du sujet: la noétique d’Averroès selon Jean de Jandun. Paris: J. Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, C. 1999. The second revelation of Arabic philosophy and science: 1492–1562. In Islam and the Italian renaissance, ed. Charles Burnett and Anna Contadini, 370–404. London: The Warburg Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, C. 2013. Revisiting the 1552–1550 and 1562 Aristotle-Averroes edition. In Renaissance Averroism and its aftermath: Arabic philosophy in early modern Europe, ed. Anna Akasoy and Guido Giglioni, 55–64. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charbonnel, J. 1919. La pensée italienne au XVIe siècle et le courant libertin. Paris: Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, A. 2017. Paul of Venice. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. (Summer 2017 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/paul-venice/

  • Cranz, F.E. 1976. Editions of the Latin Aristotle accompanied by the commentaries of Averroes. In Philosophy and humanism: Renaissance essays in honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. Edward P. Mahoney, 116–128. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Donato, S. 2004. Il Kašf ‘an manāhiǧ di Averroè: confronto fra la versione latina di Abraham De Balmes e le citazioni di Cala Calonimo nel De mundi creatione. Materia Giudaica 9: 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Donato, S. 2013. Traduttori di Averroè e traduzioni ebraico-latine nel dibattito filosofico del XV e XVI secolo. In L’averroismo in etá moderna (1400–1700), ed. Giovanni Licata, 25–49. Macerata: Quodlibet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, M. 2016. Elijah del Medigo and Paduan Aristotelianism: Investigating the human intellect. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, C. 2013. Reconsidering the case of Elijah Delmedigo’s Averroism and its impact on Spinoza. In Renaissance Averroism and its aftermath: Arabic philosophy in early modern Europe, ed. Anna Akasoy and Guido Giglioni, 213–236. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, D. 2004. The attraction of Averroism in the Renaissance: Vernia, Achillini, Prassicio. In Philosophy, science and exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin commentaries, ed. Peter Adamson et al., 131–147. London: Institute of Classical Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, D. 2016. Success and suppression: Arabic sciences and philosophy in the Renaisssance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, N. 2013. The transmutations of a young Averroist: Agostino Nifo’s commentary on the Destruction destructionum of Averroes and the nature of celestial influences. In Renaissance Averroism and its aftermath: Arabic philosophy in early modern Europe, ed. Anna Akasoy and Guido Giglioni, 99–123. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E. 1988. The intellective soul. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, ed. Charles B. Schmitt et al., 485–534. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeller, P.O. 1965. Paduan Averroism and Alexandrism in the light of recent studies. In Renaissance thought II, 111–118. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacClintock, S. 1954–55. Heresy and epithet: An approach to the problem of Latin Averroism. I. Review of Metaphysics 8: 176–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, E. 1970. Agostino Nifo’s early views on immortality. Journal of the History of Philosophy 8: 451–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, E. 1976. Nicoletto Vernia on the soul and immortality. In Philosophy and humanism: Renaissance essays in honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. Edward P. Mahoney, 144–163. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, E. 1986. Marsilio Ficino’s influence on Nicoletto Vernia, Agostino Nifo and Marcantonio Zimara. In Marsilio Ficino e il ritornodi Platone: studi e documenti, ed. Gian Carlo Garfagnini, vol. 2, 509–531. Florence: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, E. 1993. Agostino Nifo and Neoplatonism. In Il neoplatonismo nel rinascimento, ed. Pietro Prini, 205–231. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marebon, J. 2013. Ernest Renan and Averroism: The story of a misinterpretation. In Renaissance Averroism and its aftermath: Arabic philosophy in early modern Europe, ed. Anna Akasoy and Guido Giglioni, 273–283. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. 2007. Rethinking Renaissance Averroism. Intellectual history review 17: 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. 2013. Humanism and the assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance. In Renaissance Averroism and its aftermath: Arabic philosophy in early modern Europe, ed. Anna Akasoy and Guido Giglioni, 65–79. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. 2014. Subverting Aristotle: Religion, history, and philosophy in early modern science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. 2015. Providence and seventeenth-century attacks on Averroes. In Averroes’ natural philosophy and its reception in the Latin west, ed. Paul J.J.M. Bakker. Leuven: University of Leuven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfasani, J. 1993. The Averroism of John Argyropoulos and his “Quaestio utrum intellectus humanus sit perpetuus”. I Tatti Studies in the Italian Renaissance 5: 157–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. 1958. Saggi sull’aristotelismo padovano dal secolo XIV al XVI. Florence: Sansoni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, S. 2000. Aristotle’s zoology and its Renaissance commentators. Leuven: University of Leuven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaia, G. 2002. Gli aristotelici padovani al vaglio del Dictionnaire historique et critique. In La presenza dell’aristotelismo padovano nella filosofia della prima modernità, ed. Gregorio Piaia, 419–443. Padua: Antenore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polzer, J. 1993. The “Triumph of Thomas” panel in Santa Caterina, Pisa: Meaning and date. Mitteilungen des Kunsthistorischen Institute in Florenz 37: 29–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J.H., Jr. 1961. The school of Padua and the emergence of modern science. Padua: Antenore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renan, E. 1852. Averroës et l’Averroïsme. Paris: A. Durand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. 1979. Renaissance Averroism studied through the Venetian editions of Aristotle-Averroes (with particular reference to the Giunta edition of 1550–1552). In L’Averroismo in Italia, 121–142. Rome: Accademia nazionale dei Lincei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiris, G. 2018. Pletho, Scholarios and Arabic philosophy. In Never the twain shall meet: Latins and Greeks learning from each other in Byzantium, ed. Denis Searby, 309–334. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturlese, L. 1994. “Averroè quantumque arabo et ignorante di lingua greca …” Note sull’averroismo di Giordano Bruno. In Averroismus im Mittelalter und in der Renaissance, ed. Friedrich Niewöhner and Loris Sturlese, 319–348. Zurich: Spur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thijssen, J.M.M.H. 1998. Censure and heresy at the university of Paris, 1200–1400. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Troilo, E. 1939. Averroismo e aristotelismo padovano. Florence: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Martin, C. (2018). Averroism, Renaissance. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_822-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_822-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics