Skip to main content

Boundaries in Structural Family Therapy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 859 Accesses

Introduction

“Boundary Definition” according to Davidson (1983) was one of the most important concepts of General Systems Theory. It provided an inclusive contextual view that was expansive enough to include the significant factors relevant for understanding a particular organism or entity (p. 33). Minuchin (1974) viewed the family and its subsystems as circumscribed by boundaries.

Theoretical Context for Concept

Boundaries are the “rules defining who participates and how.” (Ibid., p. 53). Their function is “to protect the differentiation of the system. Every family subsystem has specific functions and makes specific demands on its members, and the development of interpersonal skills achieved in these subsystems is predicated on the subsystems freedom from interferences by other subsystems” (Ibid., pp. 53–54). Boundary permeability will therefore affect family functioning.

Description

First described boundaries in the family as enmeshed or disengaged. Later (1974) he applied these...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Colapinto, J. (1995). Dilution of family process in social services: Implications for treatment of neglectful families. Family Process, 34, 59–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M. (1983). Uncommon sense: The life and thought of Ludwig von Bertalannffy (1901–1972), father of general systems theory. Los Angeles: J. P. Tarcher, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1984). Family kaleidoscope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., Montalvo, B., Guerney, B. L., & Schumer, F. (1967). Families of the slums. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., Rosman, B. L., & Baker, L. (1978). Psychosomatic families: Anorexia nervosa in context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., Simon, G. M., & Lee, W. Y. (1996; 2006, 2nd ed.). Mastering family therapy: Journeys of Growth and Transformation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, P., Colapinto, J., & Minuchin, S. (1998; 2007, 2nd ed.). Working with families of the poor. New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., Nichols, M. P., & Lee, W. Y. (2007). Assessing families and couples: From symptom to system. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., Reiter, M., & Borda, C. (2014). The craft of family therapy: Challenging certainties. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. M. (2015). Structural couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (5th ed., pp. 358–384). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Holm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Holm, R. (2018). Boundaries in Structural Family Therapy. In: Lebow, J., Chambers, A., Breunlin, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_246-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_246-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics