Definition
Counter to what is seen in most countries, women are intimate partner violence perpetrators at a similar rate as are men in the United States. Aggression is modulated by environmentally sensitive brain mechanisms. The United States provides a unique set of societal forces that through these mechanisms promote higher levels of female-initiated intimate partner violence relative to other nations.
Introduction
Traditionally, men have been stereotyped as being perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV), whereas women have been depicted as victims. Early research suggested that if women were aggressive toward their male partners, it was in the context of self-defense (e.g., Dobash and Dobash 2004). However, in the last 50 years, research from the United States has suggested that women are just as likely to be the perpetrators of IPV, and in many samples they have been shown...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.5.651.
Archer, J. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social- role analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 133–153. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_3.
Cross, C. P., & Campbell, A. C. (2013). Violence and aggression in women. In T. K. Shackelford & V. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary psychology: The evolution of aggression (pp. 211–232). doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9314-3_11.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyler.
Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. E. (2004). Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships: Working on a puzzle. The British Journal of Criminology, 44, 323–349.
Fiebert, M. S., & Gonzalez, D. M. (1997). College women who initiate assaults on their male partners and the reasons offered for such behavior. Psychological Reports, 80, 583–590.
Goetz, A. T. (2010). The evolutionary psychology of violence. Psicothema, 22, 15–21.
Mize, K. D., Shackelford, T. K., & Shackelford, V. A. (2009). Hands-on killing of intimate partners as a function of sex and relationship status/state. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 463–470. doi:10.1007/s10896-009-9244-5.
Stets, J., & Straus, M. (1992). Gender differences in reporting marital violence. In M. A. Strauss & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American violence (pp. 151–166). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Aldine: Chicago.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). Who kills whom in spousal killings? On the exceptional sex ratios of spousal homicides in the United States. Criminology, 30, 189–215.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1998). Lethal and nonlethal violence against wives and the evolutionary psychology of male sexual proprietariness. In R. E. Dobash & R. P. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 199–230). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mize, K.D. (2017). Unique Patterns in the United States. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_909-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_909-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences