Skip to main content

Accountability and Ethics

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:

Accountability is a concept that no one can be against. It conveys an image of transparency and trustworthiness. It is increasingly used in political discourse and policy documents. The concept has many meanings and is partly overlapping with other concepts such as “responsibility.”

This chapter will first elaborate on why accountability is important. Subsequently different meanings of the concept will be presented. Lastly how the different meanings of accountability relate to the quality of government will be discussed.

Why “Accountability” Is an Important Concept

People’s natural inclination is to favor their own kind, whether it be family, friends, business associates, or other individuals or organizations that they have a close relation to. Modern democratic rule, on the contrary, has ethical universalism as an ideal. In this context it is necessary to move away from particularism and favoritism (Mungiu-Pippidi 2013). Many argue that accountability and control are a prerequisite...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Bovens M (2005) Public accountability. In Ferlie E. (eds), The Oxford handbook of public administration (pp. 422–445). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T, Lægreid P (2011) The Ashgate research companion to new public management. In P Lægreid & T Christensen (eds), (pp. XVI, 505 s.). Farnham: Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2014) Political order and political decay. Profile books Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood C (1991) A public management for all seasons? Public Adm 69(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan R (2000) ‘Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept? Public Adm 78(3):555–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mungiu-Pippidi A (2006) Corruption: diagnosis and treatment. J Democr 17(3):86–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mungiu-Pippidi A (2013) Controlling corruption through collective action. J Democr 24(1):101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power M (1997) The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichborn- Kjennerud K (2013) Political accountability and performance audit: the case of the Auditor General in Norway. Public Adm 91(3):680–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichborn-Kjennerud K, Johnsen Å (2015) Performance audits and supreme audit institutions’ impact on public administration. The case of the Office of the Auditor General in Norway. Adm Soc. doi:10.1177/0095399715623315

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein B, Teorell J (2008) What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21(2):165–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein B (2011) The quality of government: corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Reichborn-Kjennerud .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. (2016). Accountability and Ethics. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2465-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2465-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Accountability and Ethics
    Published:
    26 October 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2465-2

  2. Original

    Accountability
    Published:
    05 July 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2465-1