Skip to main content

Separation of the Powers from Birth to Now: Democratic Countries

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance
  • 65 Accesses

Synonyms

Executive; Judicial institutions; Legislature; The separation of the powers

Definition

The separation of the powers refers to the idea that if the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty, because apprehensions may rise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner.

Introduction

From east to west and north to south, people with any race, color, religion, and culture always try to overcome the tyranny and gain democracy and liberty during the history. So it’s not amazing to confront the complementary or completely new ideas for the human being social systems. Political theories are one of the originations to meet these kinds of needs. As Princeton (2015) defined, it is the study of the concepts and principles that people use to describe, explain, and evaluate political events and institutions. Any idea in this area has been impacted with...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alikhani M (1995) The basement of the laws. Dastan Published, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1959) Politic (trans: Enayat H). Neel published, Tehran, p 126

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Geographic (2001) How Australia’s Parliament works. Australian Geographic, Issue 63 Jul–Sep 2001. Retrieved 16 June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard A, Söderqvist J (2012) The futurica trilogy: the netocrats. Stockholm Text, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron M (2013) Strong constitutions: social-cognitive origins of the separation of powers. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Central Intelligence Agency (2016) The world fact book: France, CIA. Retrieved 12 Feb 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarendon Press (1961) Montesquieu; a critical biography. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Date Accessed 15 Nov 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • George Routledge & Sons (1887) Montesquieu. London, Ulan Press reprint, 2011, p 10. ASIN: B00A5TMPHC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazi-Zade A (2006) The necessitates of basic laws. Mizan Published, Tehran, p 163

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanf KI & Toonen TA (Eds.) (2012) Policy implementation in federal and unitary systems: questions of analysis and design (Vol. 23). Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi H (2016) Basic laws. Khorsandi Published, Tehran, p 84

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirn W (2000) The new radicals: the people who brought us Seattle have now done Washington; are they dreams or sly subversives? Time

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart A (1992) Introduction. In: Lijphart A (ed) Parliamentary versus presidential government. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart A (1999) Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner HV (2006) The digital divide: the role of political institutions in technology diffusion. Comp Pol Stud 39(2):176–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu, Charles-Louis (1955) The spirit of the law, (4Th Edition). (Trans: Mohandes. A.), Eghbal Published, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Princeton University (2015) Department of politics. www.princeton.edu/politics/fields/political-theory/

  • Rasso J (1967) The social contract (trans: Shakibapour E). Farokhi Published, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • The constitution of Russian federation (2007) The constitution of the Russian Federation. Retrieved 27 Dec 2007. http://www.constitution.ru/en/10003000-05.htm

  • The National Diet of Japan (2016) Guide relationship to other bodies. The National Diet of Japan, House of Councillors, The National Diet of Japan. www.sangiin.go.jp/eng/guide/relation/

  • Thomas L (2009) Locke on government (Osquian A). Hekmat Published, Tehran, p 15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fateme Tavallaei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Tavallaei, F. (2018). Separation of the Powers from Birth to Now: Democratic Countries. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3475-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3475-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics