Skip to main content

Budget Reform and Political Reform

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance

Synonyms

Accountability in the budget process; Budget discipline; Budget documentation; Fiscal rules; Political reform

Definition

“Budget Reform and Political Reform” examines the political nature of the budget process, including the interplay between the agents in the budget exercise, and considers the difficulties and opportunities that the politicization of the budget process provides for conducting meaningful fiscal reform.

Introduction

The budget is an inherently political enterprise. It is susceptible to intrusion from vested interests that are not always immediately evident and is usually the product of a process of negotiation that has evolved over a long period of time. While it may feign the semblance of a neutral process, the budget is the politically driven, subjectively oriented, “financial reflection of what the government intends to do” (Wildavsky 1961).

Therefore, “reforms” and other alternations in the budget process are often characterized by either overt political...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chohan UW (2017) Qu’est-ce que une charte de l’honnêteté budgétaire? Le cas de l’Australie. La Revue Parlementaire Canadienne 40(1):11–15. (French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chohan UW, Jacobs K (2017a) The presidentialisation thesis and parliamentary budget offices. Parliam Aff 70(2):361–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Chohan UW, Jacobs K (2017b) Public value as rhetoric: a budgeting approach. Int J Public Adm 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers RT (2016) How to make budget process reform politically feasible. Econ Stud Brook 2016(4):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner P, Redburn S, Joyce P, Meyers R (2012) Strengthening the federal budget process. National Academy of Public Administration and American Society for Public Administration, 12 July

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick A (2004) Fiscal institutions versus political will. In: Kopits G (ed) Rules-based fiscal policy in emerging markets. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp 81–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky A (1961) Political implications of budgetary reform. Public Adm Rev 21:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby WF (1918) The budget as an instrument of political reform. Proc Acad Polit Sci City NY 8(1):56–63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Usman W. Chohan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chohan, U.W. (2018). Budget Reform and Political Reform. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_403-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_403-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics