Skip to main content

Bureaucratic Structure Hypothesis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance
  • 74 Accesses

Synonyms

Bribery; Collusion; Extortion

Definition

Abuse of public power for private gain.

Introduction

Corruption (i.e., abuse of public power for private gain) is a problematic issue worldwide, but its corrosive effects are particularly prevalent in developing countries. This is true in areas including economic growth (Mauro 1996, 1998), income inequality (Gupta et al. 1998), tax revenues (Ghura 1998), and child mortality rates (Gupta et al. 2000). Policies effective for reducing corruption therefore need to be pursued.

In addressing this, Quah (2007) separates policies implemented in Asia into three categories. First are cases wherein anti-corruption laws have been enacted but no department or body exists to enforce them. Second are when anti-corruption laws have been enacted and there is a department to enforce them, but the bodies are not independent. Third are cases wherein anti-corruption laws have been enacted and an independent administrative body enforces them.

Singapore’s...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bac M (1996a) Corruption and supervision costs in hierarchies. J Comp Econ 22(2):99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bac M (1996b) Corruption and supervision and the structure of hierarchies. J Law Econ Org 12(2):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu KS, Bhattacharya S, Mishra A (1992) Notes on bribery and control of corruption. J Public Econ 48(3):349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo JD (2000) Corruption in hierarchies. Ann Econ Stat 59:37–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghura D (1998) Tax revenue in sub-Saharan Africa: effects of economic policies and corruption. IMF working paper, 98/135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Davoodi H, Alonso-Terme R (1998) Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? IMF Working Paper, 98/76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Davoodi H, Tiongson E (2000) Corruption and the provision of health care and education services. IMF Working Paper, 00/116

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro P (1996) The effects of corruption on growth, investment, and government expenditure. IMF Working paper, 96/98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro P (1998) Corruption and the composition of governments expenditure. J Public Econ 69:263–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah JST (2007) Anti-corruption agencies in four Asian countries: a comparative analysis. Int Publ Manag Rev 8(2):73–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman S (ed) (2007) International handbook on the economics of corruption. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman S, Søreide T (eds) (2011) International handbook on the economics of corruption, vol 2. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideki Sato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sato, H. (2018). Bureaucratic Structure Hypothesis. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_652-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_652-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics