Skip to main content

Anisogamy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Synonyms

Sexual reproduction

Definition

Anisogamy can be defined as a mode of sexual reproduction in which fusing gametes, formed by participating parents, are dissimilar in size.

Introduction

The most important event of an organism’s life is to pass on genes to the next generation. Some organisms choose asexual mode, while some prefer more costly process, i.e., sexual reproduction (Barnard 2004). The sexual reproduction is considered as one of the greatest paradoxes of evolution as it applies twofold costs to its practitioners and still prevails in population as a major form of reproduction. The twofold cost of sexual reproduction is (I) cost of meiosis and (II) “fertility cost” of sex (Smith 1978). Whenever female reproduces sexually, she throws away half of her genotype, which foist 50% cost of meiosis. This loss is fulfilled by benefits of sexual reproduction. But this one is considered as misbelief aroused due to our thinking in terms of individual selection (Treisman and Dawkins 1976...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Astrid Kodric-Brown, J. H. (1987). Anisogamy, sexual selection, and the evolution and maintenance of sex. Evolutionary Ecology, 1, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. J. (2004). Animal behaviour: Mechanism, development, function and evolution. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2(Pt. 3), 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. (1978). The evolution of anisogamy. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 73(2), 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. (1982). The masterpiece of nature. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R., Hosken, D. J., & Pitnick, S. S. (Eds.). (2008). Sperm biology: An evolutionary perspective. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall, M. B. (2006). The evolution of anisogamy: The adaptive significance of damage, repair and mortality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 238(1), 198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. G., & Parker, G. A. (2002). The evolution of anisogamy: A game-theoretic approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269(1507), 2381–2388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1888). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (Vol. 1). London: Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Janicke, T., Häderer, I. K., Lajeunesse, M. J., & Anthes, N. (2016). Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Science Advances, 2(2), e1500983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2002). Sexual stereotypes (pp. 254–256).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen, J., Jennions, M. D., & Kokko, H. (2012). The many costs of sex. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(3), 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monro, K., & Marshall, D. J. (2016). Unravelling anisogamy: Egg size and ejaculate size mediate selection on morphology in free-swimming sperm. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283(1834), 20160671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A., Baker, R. R., & Smith, V. G. F. (1972). The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 36(3), 529–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M. (1971). The origin and maintenance of sex. In Group selection. G. C. Williams (Ed.) (pp. 163–175). Aldine-Atherton, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M. (1978). The evolution of sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Google Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M. (1988). Games, sex and evolution. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M. (1989). Did Darwin Get It Right: Essays on Game, Sex and Evolution? First. Great Britain: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, M., & Dawkins, R. (1976). The “cost of meiosis”: is there any? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 63(2), 479–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection (Vol. 136, p. 179). Cambridge: Biological Laboratories, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mukesh Meena or Prashant Swapnil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kumar, R., Meena, M., Swapnil, P. (2019). Anisogamy. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_340-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_340-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics