Skip to main content

Business Unsustainability and Early Warning Systems

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Introduction

The world is becoming increasingly interconnected and complex. It is now common to speak of events influenced by the “butterfly effect,” in which organizations and institutions suffer the effects of apparently distant and unrelated actions of others. This represents a very serious problem for the survival of organizations and business sustainability, since it is possible that there are threats to their integrity that are unknown or that, while known, are not considered. The task of managing a modern organization is very complex with drastic potential effects, which probably requires a change in how organizations are being managed.

This chapter outlines the elements and concepts that create business unsustainability. First, a discussion is presented to define business sustainability. Business sustainability is an ambiguous, yet widely discussed, concept in recent decades intended to embed sustainability into business management. In the second section, the concept of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Ahern J (2011) From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc Urban Plan 100:341–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M, Skoldberg K (2009) Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M, Spicer A (2010) Metaphors we lead by: understanding leadership in the real world. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M, Spicer A (2012) A stupidity-based theory of organizations. J Manag Stud 49:1194–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amyotte P, Margeson A, Chiasson A, Khan F (2014) There is no such thing as a black swan process incident. Hazards 24(159):12–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D (2017) Big is fragile The Oxford handbook of mega project management 1:40. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198732242.013.5

  • Bansal P, DesJardine M (2014) Business sustainability: It is about time. Strateg Organ 12:70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013520265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck H (2017) Irren ist nützlich: Warum die Schwächen des Gehirns unsere Stärken sind. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoncel T, Erenda I, Bach MP et al (2018a) A managerial early warning system at a smart factory: an intuitive decision-making perspective. Syst Res Behav Sci 35:406–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoncel T, Erenda I, Meško M (2018b) Managerial early warning system as best practice for project selection at a smart factory. Amfiteatru Econ 20:805–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Bin Shawiah FF (2016) Risk management strategies for dealing with unpredictable risk in Saudi Arabian organisations. PhD diss., University of Salford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken NMP, Short SW, Rana P, Evans S (2014) A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J Clean Prod 65:42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski L, Thévenot L (2006) On justification: economies of worth. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau M-C, Chen A, Huber M (2008) Green IS: building sustainable business practices. Inf Syst A Glob:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWAT.2005.1461133

  • Bussiere M, Fratzscher M (2006) Towards a new early warning system of financial crises. J Int Money Financ 25(6):953–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo FJ (2007) The coming of age of knowledge-based development. J Knowledge Manage 11(5):3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Chemical Process Safety (2012) Recognizing catastrophic incident warning signs in the process industries. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane A, Matten D (2016) Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis T, Higgins J (2013) A blockbuster failure: how an outdated business model destroyed a giant

    Google Scholar 

  • Derissen S, Quaas MF, Baumgärtner S (2011) The relationship between resilience and sustainability of ecological-economic systems. Ecol Econ 70:1121–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi R (2010) Role of media in disaster management and early warning. Amity Inst Disaster Manag 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Econsense (2017) How companies can improve their impact on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and harness the power of digitalization: a practical handbook for managers. Econsense. Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen B, Hausmann R (1999) Exchange rates and financial fragility (No. w7418). National bureau of economic research

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manag Rev 36:90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingwood BR, Rosowsky DV, Li Y, Kim JH (2004) Fragility Assessment of Light-Frame Wood Construction Subjected to Wind and Earthquake Hazards. J Struct Eng 130:1921–1930. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1921)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Fahjan Y, Ozel O, Alcik H, Mert A, Gul M (2003) Istanbul earthquake rapid response and the early warning system. Bull Earthq Eng 1(1):157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro F, Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2005) Economics of language and assumptions: how theories can become self-fulfilling. Acad Manag Rev 30:8–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend P (2010) Against method, 4th edn. Verso Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin TN, Kennelly JJ, Krause T (1995) Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable for Implications Development : and Theory. Acad Manag Rev 20:874–907. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9512280024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez RVD, Martins MF (2017) Knowledge Management Process: a theoretical-conceptual research. Gestão Produção 24:248–265. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x0893-15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G (2007) The future of management. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Harford T (2011) Adapt: Why success always starts with failure. Farrar, Straus and Giroux

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugh HM, Talwar A (2010) How Do Corporations Embed Sustainability Across the Organization? Acad Manag Learn Educ 9:384–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.3.zqr384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P (1993) Ecology of commerce: how business can save the planet. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Israilides J, Lock R, Cooke L (2013) Ignorance management. Bus Inf Rev 27:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382109357389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleine A, von Hauff M (2009) Sustainability-driven implementation of corporate social responsibility: Application of the integrative sustainability triangle. J Bus Ethics 85:517–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0212-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labuschagne C, Brent AC, Van Erck RPG (2005) Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. J Clean Prod 13:373–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas HC, Goh JM (2009) Disruptive technology: How Kodak missed the digital photography revolution. J Strateg Inf Syst 18:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2009.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie K (1999) Parasites as pollution indicators in marine ecosystems: a proposed early warning system. Mar Pollut Bull 38(11):955–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB, Hudson RL (2010) The (mis) behaviour of markets: a fractal view of risk, ruin and reward. Basic Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Adm Sci Q 48:268. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald LG, Robinson P (2010) A colossal failure of common sense: the inside story of the collapse of Lehman Brothers. Crown Business

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya JM, Pimm SL, Solé RV (2006) Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 442:259–264. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K, Packer C, Stevens A, Simpson S (2007) Effective early warning systems for new and emerging health technologies: developing and evaluation framework and assessment of current systems. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 23:324–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltrinieri N, Khan F, Amyotte P, Cozzani V (2014) Dynamic approach to risk management: application to the Hoeganaes metal dust accidents. Process Saf Environ Prot 92:669–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passos DS, Coelho H, Sarti FM (2018) From resilience to the design of antifragility. In: PESARO 2018: The eighth international conference on performance, safety and robustness in complex systems and applications, pp 7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2003) Inquiry into appreciative evaluation. N Dir Eval 2003:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platje J (2015) Sustainability and antifragility. Econ Environ Stud 15:469–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner KA (2010) Stalking the black swan: Research and decision making in a world of extreme volatility. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raiser M (1997) Informal institutions, social capital, and economic transition: reflections on a neglected dimension. EBRD

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiser M (1999) Trust in transition. In: postcommunist transformation and the social sciences, pp 77–96. Rowman & Lilltefield publishers. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiser M, Rousso A, Steves F, Teksoz U (2008) Trust in transition: cross-country and firm evidence. J Law Econ Org 24:407–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries T (2016) Forward resilience in context. In Forward Resilience : Protecting Society in an Interconnected World (pp. 1–22). Washington DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse M (2016) Early warning system. Available on: https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/early-warning-system

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumsfeld D (2002) Press Conference by US Secretary of Defence, Donald Rumsfeld. In Press Conference, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO HQ, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman E, Delmas PD (2006) Bone quality—the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med 354:2250–2261. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra053077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S (2002) Research in corporate sustainability: what really matters? In: Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad Manag Rev 36:381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson M (2012) Ignorance and uncertainty: emerging paradigms. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss W (2010) The myth of endless growth: exposing capitalism’s insustainability. Lulu press. North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs W, Cocklin C (2008) Conceptualizing a sustainability business model. Organ Environ 21:103–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2007) Black swans and the domains of statistics the black swan. The American Statistician 61(3):198–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2012) Antifragile – things that gain from disorder. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN, Martin GA (2012) How to prevent other financial crises. SAIS Rev Int Aff 32:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzeciak S, Rivers EP (2003) Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health. Emerg Med J 20:402–405. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.20.5.402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waidyanatha N (2010) Towards a typology of integrated functional early warning systems. Int J Crit Infrastruct 6(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijcis.2010.029575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltshire A (2006) Developing early warning systems: a checklist. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Early Warning (EWC), pp 27–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnard J, Adcroft A, Lee J, Skip D (2014) Surviving or flourishing? Integrating business resilience and sustainability. J Strateg Manag 7:303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu YM, Kanamori H (2005) Experiment on an onsite early warning method for the Taiwan early warning system. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(1):347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning. Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob Environ Chang 2:111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu VL, Madoff LC (2004) ProMED-mail: an early warning system for emerging diseases. Clin Infect Dis 39(2):227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Slim Zepeda Quintana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Platje, J., Quintana, D.S.Z. (2019). Business Unsustainability and Early Warning Systems. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_263-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_263-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63951-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63951-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics