Skip to main content

Feminization of Poverty: Causes and Implications

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

Definition

The “feminization of poverty” refers to the phenomenon that women and children are disproportionately represented among the world’s poor compared to men.

Introduction

According to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (2000), “women are the world’s poor.” In almost all societies, women have higher poverty rates than men (Casper et al. 1994); in fact, among the 1.5 billion people living on 1 dollar or less a day, the majority are women and children (United Nations 2015). This persistent pattern of economic inequality led American sociologist Diana Pearce to coin the term the feminization of poverty, after documenting how, over time, women and children have become disproportionately represented among the population of low-income individuals in the United States and globally. Specifically, Pearce found that in the United States, two-thirds of the poor over age 16 were women (Pearce 1978). By 1983, nearly one-half of all poor families were female-headed...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Alon S, Gelbgiser D (2011) The female advantage in college academic achievements and horizontal sex segregation. Soc Sci Res 40(1):107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antecol H, Bedard K (2002) The relative earnings of young Mexican, Black, and white women. Ind Labor Relat Rev 56(1):122–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averett S, Burton M (1996) College attendance and the college wage premium: differences by gender. Econ Educ Rev 15(1):37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau FD, Kahn LM (2003) Understanding international differences in the gender pay gap. J Labor Econ 21(1):106–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner J (1987) Feminist political discourses: radical versus liberal approaches to the feminization of poverty and comparable worth. Gend Soc 1(4):447–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown PH, Park A (2002) Education and poverty in rural China. Econ Edu Rev 21(6):523–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budig M, England P (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood. Am Sociol Rev 66(2):204–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budig MJ, Misra J, Boeckmann I (2012) The Motherhood Penalty in Cross-National Perspective: The Importance of Work-Family Policies and Cultural Attitudes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 19(2):163–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper LM, McLanahan SS, Garfinkel I (1994) The gender poverty gap: what we can learn from other countries. Am Sociol Rev 59:594–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro Martin T, Bumpass LL (1989) Recent trends in marital disruption. Demography 26:37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (2014) United States TANF caseload and TANF-to- poverty ratio fact sheet. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Washington, DC. http://www.cbpp.org/files/11-4-14tanf_factsheets/US.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin AJ (1998) Marriage and Marital Dissolution Among Black Americans. J Compar Family Stud 29(1):147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher K, England E, Smeeding TM, Ross K (2002) The gender gap in poverty in modern nations: single motherhood, the market, and the state. Sociol Perspect 45(3):219–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher K, England P, McLanahan S, Ross K, Smeeding TM (2001) Gender inequality in poverty in affluent nations: The role of single motherhood and the state. Child well-being, child poverty and child policy in modern nations. What do we know 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citro C, Michael R (eds) (1995) Measuring poverty: a new approach. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark S, Hamplová D (2013) Single motherhood and child mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: a life course perspective. Demography 50(5):1521–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007) Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty? Am J Sociol 112(5):1297–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa J, Silva E, Vaz F (2009) The role of gender inequalities in explaining income growth, poverty and inequality: evidence from Latin American countries. Working paper 52. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth, United Nations Development Programme

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier R (2010) The declining relative status of Black women workers, 1980–2002. Soc Forces 88(4): 1833–1857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmelech Y, Lu HH (2004) Race, ethnicity, and the gender poverty gap. Soc Sci Res 33:158–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England P (1997) Gender and access to money: what do trends in earnings and household poverty tell us? Paper presented at the eighth international meeting of the comparative project on class structure and class consciousness, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteve A, García-Román J, Lesthaeghe R (2012) The family context of cohabitation and single motherhood in Latin America. Popul Dev Rev 38(4):707–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evertsson M, England P, Mooi-Reci I, Hermsen J, De Bruijn J, Cotter D (2009) Is gender inequality greater at lower or higher educational levels? Common patterns in the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United States. Soc Polit 16(2):210–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fremstad S (2010) A modern framework for measuring poverty and basic economic security. Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis I, Klasen S (2014) Economic development, structural change, and women’s labor force participation: a reexamination of the feminization U hypothesis. J Popul Econ 27(3):639–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel I, McLanahan SS (1986) Single mothers and their children. UrbanInstitute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornick JC, Jäntti M (2010) Women, poverty, and social policy regimes: a cross-national analysis (No. 534). LIS Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegewisch A, Liepmann H, Hayes J, Hartmann A (2010) Separate and not equal? Gender segregation in the labor market and the gender wage gap. Briefing paper, IWPR #C377. Institute for Women’s Policy Research, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Women’s Policy Research (2016) Poverty, gender, and public policies. Retrieved 12 Apr 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim M (2002) Has the race penalty for black women disappeared in the United States? Fem Econ 8(2):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klasen S (1999) Does gender inequality reduce growth and development? Policy research report working paper 7. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen S, Lamanna F (2009) The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: new evidence for a panel of countries. Fem Econ 15(3):91–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel H, Semyonov M (2005) Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries. Am Sociol Rev 70(6): 949–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan SS, Kelly EL (2006) The feminization of poverty: past and future. In: Chafetz JS (ed) Handbook of the sociology of gender. Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 127–145

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan SS, Sorensen A, Watson D (1989) Sex differences in poverty, 1950–1980. Signs 15:102–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan SS, Casper L, Sorensen A (1995) Women’s roles and women’s poverty in eight industrialized countries. In: Mason KO, Jensen AM (eds) Gender and family change in industrialized countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 285–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra J, Moller S, Budig MJ (2007) Work – family policies and poverty for partnered and single women in Europe and North America. Gend Soc 21(6):804–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz Boudet Ana Maria, Buitrago Paola, Leroy De La Briere Benedicte, Newhouse David Locke, Rubiano Matulevich Eliana Carolina, Scott Kinnon, Suarez Becerra Pablo (2018) Gender differences in poverty and household composition through the life-cycle: a global perspective (English). Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 8360. Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2012) Gender equality in education, employment and entrepreneurship. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level, Paris: 1–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padavic I, Reskin B (2002) Women and men at work. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne KK (2012) Median age at first marriage, 2010. Family Profile-10-06, National Center for Family & Marriage Research, Bowling Green

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D (1978) The feminization of poverty: women, work, and welfare. Urban Soc Chang Rev 11:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D (1984) Farewell to alms: women’s fare under welfare. In: Freeman J (ed) Women a feminist perspective, 3rd edn. Mayfield, Palo Alto, pp 493–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman S (2003) Feminist explanations for the feminization of poverty. J Econ Issues 37(2):353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarri R (1985) Federal policy changes and the feminization of poverty. Child Welfare 64:235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen E, Clark S (1994) A child-support assurance program: how much will it reduce child poverty, and at what cost? Am Econ Rev 84(2):114–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiber N, Berghammer C, Haas B (2016) Contextualizing the education effect on women’s employment: a cross-national comparative analysis. J Marriage Fam 78(1):246–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D (1990) Intrahousehold resource allocation: an inferential approach. J Hum Resour 25:634–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015) The world’s women 2015: trends and statistics. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, Statistics Division. Sales No. E.15.XVII.8

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel J (1997) The effect of children on women’s wages. Am Sociol Rev 62:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western B, Bloome D, Percheski C (2008) Inequality among American families with children, 1975 to 2005. Am Sociol Rev 73(6):903–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiepking P, Maas I (2005) Gender differences in poverty: a cross-national study. Eur Sociol Rev 21(3):187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1993) World development report. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2018) Gender difference in poverty and household composition through the life- cycle: a global perspective. Policy research working paper: 8360

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalokar N (1990) The economic status of Black women: an exploratory investigation. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to MacKenzie A. Christensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Christensen, M.A. (2019). Feminization of Poverty: Causes and Implications. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T. (eds) Gender Equality. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70060-1_6-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70060-1_6-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70060-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70060-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics