Skip to main content

Amphibian Dispersal Among Terrestrial Habitats and Wetlands in a Landscape

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Life on Land

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

  • 57 Accesses

Synonyms

Anurans; Biological invasion; Habitat patches; Local extinction; Movement

Definitions

Wetland is an area covered with water, such as lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, dams, paddy fields, with a frequency sufficient enough to support biological communities. These areas are characterized by saturated soil and preponderance of plants which can survive in hydric soil (Cowardin et al. 1979). Upland is an area of high or hilly land. It is located at generally slightly higher elevation than wetland habitat and lacks water above the ground surface. Colonization is the occupation of a habitat or territory by a biological community or of an ecological niche by a single population of a species. Biological colonization relates to all species (Pisani et al. 2004). Habitat connectivityis the degree to which separate patches of habitat are connected. Greater habitat connectivity means animals are able to travel between these patches. It is important because this connectivity enables gene...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker JMR, Halliday TR (1999) Amphibian colonization of new ponds in an agricultural landscape. Herpetol J 9(2):55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelt PE, Peterson CR, Klaver RW (2004) Sexual differences in the post-breeding movements and habitats selected by western toads (bufo boreas) in Southeastern Idaho. Herpetologica 60(4):455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL (2006) Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden/Oxford, UK, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett G, Mulongoy KJ (2006) Review of Experience with Ecological Networks, Corridors and Buffer Zones (100 p). Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Technical Series No. 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg MP, Kiers ET, Driessen G, Van HD, Kooi BW, Kuenen F, Liefting M, Verhoef HA, Eller J (2010) Adapt or disperse: understanding species persistence in a changing world. Glob Chang Biol 16(2):587–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry O (2001) Genetic evidence for wide dispersal by the Sand Frog (Heleioporus psammophilus) (Anura: Myobatrachidae), in Western Australia. J Herpetol 35(1):136–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berven KA, Grudzien TA (1990) Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44(8):2047–2056

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford D, Ng TH, Qie L, Kudavidanage EP, Bradshaw CJ (2010) Forest fragment and breeding habitat characteristics explain frog diversity and abundance in Singapore. Biotropica 42(1):119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58(2):445–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GP, Phillips BL, Webb JK, Shine R (2006) Toad on the road: use of roads as dispersal corridors by Cane Toad (Bufo marinus) at an invasion front in tropical Australia. Biol Conserv 133(1):88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulger JB, Scott NJ Jr, Seymour RB (2003) Terrestrial activity and conservation of adult California red-legged frogs Rana aurora draytonii in coastal forests and grasslands. Biol Conserv 110(1):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock JM, Kenward RE, Hails RS (2002) Dispersal ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Malden/Oxford, UK/Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Child T, Phillips BL, Shine R (2008) Abiotic and biotic influences on the dispersal behavior of metamorph Cane Toads (Bufo marinus) in tropical Australia. J Exp Zool Part A Ecol Genet Physiol 309(4):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clobert J, Baguette M, Benton TG, Bullock JM (2012) Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FG, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service/Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Washington, DC/Jamestown. Online. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/wetlands/classwet/index.htm

  • Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 128(2):231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dancose K, Fortin D, Guo X (2011) Mechanisms of functional connectivity: the case of free-ranging bison in a forest landscape. Ecol Appl 21:1871–1885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deMaynadier PG, Hunter ML (2000) Road effects on amphibian movements in a forested landscape. Nat Areas J 20:56–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Kapos V, Ewers RM (2012) Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research. Oikos 121:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do MS, Son SJ, Choi G, Yoo N, Koo KS, Nam HK (2021) Anuran community patterns in the rice fields of the Midwestern region of the Republic of Korea. Glob Ecol Conserv 26:e01448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole JW (1971) Dispersal of recently metamorphosed Leopard Frogs, Rana pipiens. Copeia 1971(2):221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll DA (1998) Genetic structure of the frogs Geocrinia lutea and Geocrinia rosea reflects extreme population divergence and range changes, not dispersal barriers. Evolution 52(4):1147–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE, Trueb L (1986) Biology of amphibians. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Duputié A, Massol F (2013) An empiricist’s guide to theoretical predictions on the evolution of dispersal. Interface Focus 3(6):2013002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck HV, Baguette M (2005) Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? Basic Appl Ecol 6(6):535–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyke F, Berthel A, Harju SM, Lamb RL, Thompson D, Ryan J, Pyne E, Dreyer G (2017) Amphibians in forest pools: does habitat clustering affect community diversity and dynamics? Ecosphere 8(2):e01671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1977) Geographic variation, speciation, and clines (No. 10). Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Pedlar JH, Pope SE, Taylor PD, Wegner JF (1995) Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biol Conserv 73(3):177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk WC, Greene AE, Corn PS, Allendorf FW (2005) High dispersal in a frog species suggests that it is vulnerable to habitat fragmentation. Biol Lett 1:13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BJ, Fahrig L (2002) Effect of landscape structure on the movement behaviour of a specialized goldenrod beetle, Trirhabda borealis. Can J Zool 80:24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyllenberg M, Söderbacka G, Ericsson S (1993) Does migration stabilize local population dynamics? Analysis of a discrete metapopulatin model. Math Biosci 118:25–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Bruna E (1999) Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure? Ecography 22:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A (1993) Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: lessons from coupled logistic equations. Ecology 74(5):1362–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilty J, Worboys GL, Keeley A, Woodley S, Lausche B, Locke H, Carr M, Pulsford I, Pittock J, White JW, Theobald DM, Levine J, Reuling M, JEM W, Ament R, Tabor GM (2020) Guidelines for conserving connectivity through ecological networks and corridors. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 30. IUCN, Gland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchings SP, Beebee TJ (1997) Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Common Frog (Rana temporaria) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation. Heredity 79(2):117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holenweg PAK (2001) Dispersal rates and distances in adult water frogs, Rana lessonae, R. ridibunda and their hybridogenetic associate R. esculenta. Herpetologia 57:449–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen KP, Summers AP, Delis PR (2001) Spadefoot Toads (Scaphiopus holbrookii holbrookii) in an urban landscape: effects of nonnatural! substrates on burrowing in adults and juveniles. J Herpetol 35:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karraker NE, Gibbs JP (2009) Amphibian production in forested landscapes in relation to wetland hydroperiod: a case study of vernal pools and beaver ponds. Biol Conserv 142:2293–2302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DO, Scott RJ, Campbell CE, Warkentin IG (2017) Initial Dispersal and Breeding Habitat Use of Newly Introduced Mink Frogs in Western Newfoundland, Canada. Copeia 105(2):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen M, Terry A, Tucker G, Jones A (2007) Guidance on the maintenance of landscape connectivity features of major importance for wild flora and fauna. Guidance on the implementation of Article 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson MG, Sauer JR, Olsen DA, Mossman MJ, Hemesath LM, Lannoo MJ (1999) Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA. Conserv Biol 13(6):1437–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert KP, Rand AS, Mueller UG, Ryan MJ (2003) Fine scale genetic pattern and evidence for sex-biased dispersal in the Túngara Frog (Physalaemus pustulosus). Mol Ecol 12(12):3325–3334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lauck B (2005) The impact of recent logging and pond isolation on pond colonization by the Frog (Crinia signifera). Pac Conserv Biol 11(1):50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF et al (2002) Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conserv Biol 16(3):605–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen RM, Galatowitsch SM, Tester JR (1999) Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang CT (2013) Movements and habitat use of Yosemite Toads (Anaxyrus (formerly Bufo) canorus) in the Sierra National Forest, California. J Herpetol 47(4):555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh DM, Trenham PC (2001) Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conserv Biol 15(1):40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh DM, Fegraus EH, Harrison S (1999) Effects of breeding pond isolation on the spatial and temporal dynamics of pond use by the Tungara Frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. J Anim Ecol 68(4):804–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh DM, Thakur KA, Bulka KC, Clarke LB (2004) Dispersal and colonization through open fields by a terrestrial, woodland salamander. Ecology 85(12):3396–3405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews KR, Preisler HK (2010) Site fidelity of the declining amphibian Rana sierrae (Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67(2):243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle MJ (2005) Drainage ditches facilitate frog movements in a hostile landscape. Landsc Ecol 20(5):579–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measey J (2016) Overland movement in African Clawed Frogs (Xenopus laevis): a systematic review. PeerJ 4:e2474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miaud C, Sanuy D, Avrillier J (2000) Terrestrial movements of the Natterjack Toad Bufo calamita (Amphibia, Anura) in a semi-arid, agricultural landscape. Amphib-Reptilia 21:357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molofsky J (1994) Population dynamics and pattern formation in theoretical populations. Ecology 75(1):30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsen KJ, Blouin MS (2004) Extreme isolation by distance in a Montane Frog (Rana cascadae). Conserv Genet 5(6):827–835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muths E, Jung RE, Bailey LL, Adams MJ, Corn PS, Dodd CK, Fisher RN (2005) Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative (ARMI): a successful start to a national program in the United States. Appl Herpetol 2(4):355–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P (1991) Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landsc Ecol 5:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parris KM, Norton TW, Cunningham RB (1999) A comparison of techniques for sampling amphibians in the forests of South-East Queensland, Australia. Herpetologica 55(2):271–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasukonis A, Loretto MC, Rojas B (2019) How far do tadpoles travel in the rainforest? Parent-assisted dispersal in poison frogs. Evol Ecol 33:613–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick DA, Hunter ML Jr, Calhoun AJ (2006) Effects of experimental forestry treatments on a Maine amphibian community. For Ecol Manag 234(1–3):323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl CA, Bowerman J (2006) Observations of rapid colonization of constructed ponds by Western Toads (Bufo boreas) in Oregon, USA. Western North Am Nat 66(3):397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter AKH (2001) Dispersal rates and distances in adult water frogs, Rana lessonae, Rana ridibunda, and their hybridogenetic associate Rana esculenta. Herpetologica 57(4):449–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW, Holbrook CT (2006) Wetland restoration for amphibians: should local sites be designed to support metapopulations or patchy populations? Restor Ecol 14(3):404–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisani D, Poling LL, Lyons-Weiler M, Blair HS (2004) The colonization of land by animals: molecular phylogeny and divergence times among arthropods. BMC Biol 2:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzatto L, Both C, Brown G, Shine R (2017) The accelerating invasion: dispersal rates of cane toads at an invasion front compared to an already-colonized location. Evol Ecol 31(4):533–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall L, Lloyd N, Moehrenschlager A (2018) Guidelines for mitigation translocations of amphibians: applications for Canada’s Prairie Provinces, vol 10. Centre for Conservation Research Calgary Zoological Society. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 94 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimchen TE (1990) Introduction and dispersal of the Pacific Tree frog, (Hyla regilla), on the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia. Can Field Nat 105(2):288–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro MC, Martensen AC, Metzger JP, Tabarelli M, Scarano F, Fortin MJ (2011) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: a shrinking biodiversity hotspot. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC (eds) Biodiversity hotspots. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/Germany, pp 406–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothermel BB, Semlitsch RD (2002) An experimental investigation of landscape resistance of forest versus old-field habitats to emigrating juvenile amphibians. Conserv Biol 16:1324–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnick D, Beier P, Cushman S, Dieffenbach F, Epps, CW, Gerber L, Hartter J, Jenness J, Kintsch J, Merenlender AM, Perkle RM, Preziosi DV, Ryan SJ, and Trombulak SC (2012) The role of landscape connectivity in planning and implementing conservation and restoration priorities. Issues in ecology. Report no. 16. Ecological Society of America, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabrook WA, Dettmann EB (1996) Roads as activity corridors for Cane Toad in Australia. J Wildl Manag 60(2):363–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (2008) Differentiating migration and dispersal processes for pond breeding amphibians. J Wild Manage 72(1):260–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren GP (1994) Distribution and extinction patterns within a northern metapopulation of the pool frog, Rana lessonae. Ecology 75(5):1357–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK, Werner EE, Cortwright SA (1999) Long term distributional dynamics of a Michigan amphibian assemblage. Ecology 80(7):2326–2337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28(1):110–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Green DM (2006) Sex, isolation and fidelity: unbiased long-distance dispersal in a terrestrial amphibian. Ecography 29(5):649–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens VM, Polus E, Wesselingh RA, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2004) Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the Natterjack Toad (Bufo calamita). Landsc Ecol 19(8):829–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Fahrig L, With KA (2006) Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 29–43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tingley R, Greenlees M, Shine R (2012) Hydric balance and locomotor performance of an anuran (Rhinella marina) invading the Australian arid zone. Oikos 121:1959–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewege MW, Swannack TM, Greuter KL, Brown DJ, Forstner MRJ (2013) Breeding site fidelity and terrestrial movement of an endangered amphibian, the Houston Toad (Bufo houstonensis). Herpetol Conserv Biol 8(2):435–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Villiers FAD, Measey J (2017) Overland movement in African Clawed Frogs (Xenopus laevis): empirical dispersal data from within their native range. PeerJ 5:e4039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Braak CJT, Nieuwenhuizen W (2000) Incidence function modelling and conservation of the Tree Frog (Hyla arborea) in the Netherlands. Ecol Bull 48:165–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Jong AGAD, Goedhart PW, Smulders MJM (2001) Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the Moor Frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity 86(5):598–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walter KT (2015) Amphibian corridor: a Frog and Salamander Habitat Restoration Project. Master of Environmental Horticulture. School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JW, McAllister KR, Pierce DJ (2003) Home ranges, movements, and habitat selection of Oregon Spotted Frogs (Rana pretiosa). J Herpetol 37(2):292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright AD, Grant EHC, Zipkin EF (2020) A hierarchical analysis of habitat area, connectivity, and quality on amphibian diversity across spatial scales. Landsc Ecol 35:529–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngquist MB, Boone MD (2014) Movement of amphibians through agricultural landscapes: the role of habitat on edge permeability. Biol Conserv 175:148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeisset I, Beebee TJ (2003) Population genetics of a successful invader: the Marsh Frog (Rana ridibunda) in Britain. Mol Ecol 12(3):639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Paul Freed (US) for proof reading the draft of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammd Rais .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rais, M., Ahmed, W. (2021). Amphibian Dispersal Among Terrestrial Habitats and Wetlands in a Landscape. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T. (eds) Life on Land. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_151-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_151-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71065-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71065-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics