Life on Land

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Amanda Lange Salvia, Tony Wall

Planted Forests: Characterization and Sustainable Management

  • Vladan IvetićEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_91-1
  • 193 Downloads

Synonyms

Definitions

Planted forests are predominantly composed of trees established through planting and/or through deliberate seeding of native or introduced species. Establishment is either through afforestation on land which has not carried forest within living memory or by reforestation of previously forested land (FAO 2010a).

The concept of planted forests covers a continuum of forest conditions, from mixture of native species planted or seeded for biodiversity enhancement on the one side to the monoculture forest plantations on the other side of the spectra (Zhang and Stanturf 2008; Ivetić and Vilotić 2014). This continuum is due to various economic, social, cultural, and environmental contexts that influence policy objectives and management practices for planted forests in different countries (FAO 2010b). Planted forests are characterized by a human manipulation of stand genetic by use of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AEBIOM – European Biomass Association (2012) European bioenergy outlook 2012. Brussels. http://www.aebiom.org
  2. Baral H, Guariguata MR, Keenan RJ (2016) A proposed framework for assessing ecosystem goods and services from planted forests. Ecosyst Servir 22:260–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batra P, Pirard R (2015) Is a typology for planted forests feasible, or even relevant? CIFOR infobrief no. 121. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor.  https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/005608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J (2008) Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers Conserv 17:925.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9380-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brundu G, Richardson DM (2016) Planted forests and invasive alien trees in Europe: a code for managing existing and future plantings to mitigate the risk of negative impacts from invasions. In: Daehler CC, van Kleunen M, Pyšek P, Richardson DM (eds) Proceedings of 13th international EMAPi conference, Waikoloa. NeoBiota 30:5–47.  https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.30.7015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buongiorno J, Zhu S (2014) Assessing the impact of planted forests on the global forest economy. NZJ For Sci 44(Suppl 1):S2.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-44-S1-S2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carle J, Holmgren P (2003) Definitions related to planted forests. In: UNFF intercessional expert meeting on the role of planted forests in sustainable forest management, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 329–343Google Scholar
  8. Carle J, Holmgren P (2008) Peter Wood from planted forests: a global outlook 2005–2030. For Prod J 58:6–18Google Scholar
  9. Carle JB, Ball JB, Del Lungo A (2009) The global thematic study of planted forests. In: Evans J (ed) Planted forests: uses, impacts and sustainability. CAB International, FAO, Rome, pp 33–46.  https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845935641.0033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carnus JM, Parrotta JA, Brockerhoff EG, Arbez M, Jactel H, Kremer A, Lamb D, O’Hara K, Walters BB (2006) Planted forests and biodiversity. J Forest 104(2):65–77Google Scholar
  11. Crowther TW, Glick HB, Covey KR, Bettigole C, Maynard DS, Thomas SM, Smith JR, Hintler G, Duguid MC, Amatulli G, Tuanmu MN, Jetz W, Salas C, Stam C, Piotto D, Tavani R, Green S, Bruce G, Williams SJ, Wiser SK, Huber MO, Hengeveld GM, Nabuurs GJ, Tikhonova E, Borchardt P, Li CF, Powrie LW, Fischer M, Hemp A, Homeier J, Cho P, Vibrans AC, Umunay PM, Piao SL, Rowe CW, Ashton MS, Crane PR, Bradford MA (2015) Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature 525(7568):201–205.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cubbage F (2003) Sustainable forest management, forest certification, tree improvement, and forest biotechnology. In: McKinley CR (ed) Proceedings of the 27th southern forest tree improvement conference, Oklahoma State University, USA, pp 6–15Google Scholar
  13. Duffy JE, Godwin CM, Cardinale BJ (2017) Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity. Nature 549(7671):261–264.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans J (2009) The history of tree planting and planted forests. In: Evans J (ed) Planted forests: uses, impacts and sustainability. CAB International and FAO, Wallingford/Rome, pp 5–22.  https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845935641.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. FAO (1982) Forestry paper 30: tropical forest resource, by J.P. Lanly. 120 pagesGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (1995) FAO forestry paper 124: forest resources assessment 1990 – global synthesis. http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/v5695e/v5695e00.htm
  17. FAO (2000) FAO forestry paper 140: global forest resources assessment 2000. http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/Y1997E/y1997e08.htm#bm08
  18. FAO (2006a) Global planted forests thematic study: results and analysis. In: Del Lugo A, Ball J, Carle J (eds) Planted forests and trees working paper 38. Rome (also available at www.fao.org/forestry/site/10368/en)
  19. FAO (2006b) FAO forestry paper 147 global forest resources assessment 2005 progress towards sustainable forest management. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 350 pagesGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (2010a) FAO forestry paper 163: global forest resources assessment 2010 main report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 378 pagesGoogle Scholar
  21. FAO (2010b) Planted forests in sustainable forest management. A statement of principles. http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/al248e/al248e00.pdf
  22. FAO (2012) Forest resources assessment working paper 180: FRA 2015 terms and definitions. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 36 pagesGoogle Scholar
  23. FAO (2015) Global forest resources assessment 2015 desk reference. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 244 pagesGoogle Scholar
  24. FAO (2018) Forest resources assessment working paper 188: terms and definitions FRA 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 26 pagesGoogle Scholar
  25. FAO. http://www.fao.org/forestry/plantedforests/en/. Last accessed 10 July 2018
  26. Fox TR (2000) Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantations. For Ecol Manag 138:187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guo Q, Ren H (2014a) Planted versus natural forests in China. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1461–1471.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guo Q, Ren H (2014b) Productivity as related to diversity and age in planted versus natural forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1461–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heryati Y, Abdu A, Mahat MN, Abdul-Hamid H, Majid NM, Heriansyah I, Ahmad K (2011) Assessing forest plantation productivity of exotic and indigenous species on degraded secondary forests. Am J Agric Biol Sci 6:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Humphrey JW, Ferris R, Peace AJ, Jukes MR (2001) Biodiversity in planted forests. Forest research annual report and accounts 2000–2001. The Stationery Office, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  31. ICPF (2013) Planted forests are a vital resource for future green economies. Summary report of the 3rd international congress on planted forests. http://www.fao.org/forestry/37902-083cc16479b4b28d8d4873338b79bef41.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2016
  32. INDUFOR (2012) FSC current and future plantations. A12-06869. 4 Oct 2012Google Scholar
  33. Ivetić V (2017) The use of exotic tree species in Serbia: what we have learned so far? In: Löf M (ed) Program and book of abstracts of the IUFRO 3rd restoring forest: regeneration and ecosystem function for the future. Lund. 12–14 September 2017. Report 51. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Alnarp, p 76Google Scholar
  34. Ivetić V, Devetaković J (2016) Reforestation challenges in Southeast Europe facing climate change. Reforesta 1:178–220.  https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.1.10.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ivetić V, Devetaković J (2017) Concerns and evidence on genetic diversity in planted forests. Reforesta 3:196–207.  https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.3.15.39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ivetić V, Vilotić D (2014) The role of plantation forestry in sustainable development. Bull Fac Forestry Spec Ed: 157–180Google Scholar
  37. Ivetić V, Isajev V, Šijačić-Nikolić M (2005) Results of fourteen year’s old Norway spruce provenance test in Serbia. Proceedings of symposium forest and sustainable development, Brasov, pp 65–71Google Scholar
  38. Ivetić V, Devetaković J, Nonić M, Stanković D, Šijačić-Nikolić M (2016) Genetic diversity and forest reproductive material – from seed source selection to planting. iForest 9:801–812.  https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1577-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jacobs DF, Oliet JA, Aronson J, Bolte A, Bullock JM, Donoso PJ, Landhäusser SM, Madsen P, Peng S, Rey-Benayas JMR, Weber JC (2015) Restoring forests: what constitutes success in the 21st century? New For 46:601–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jürgensen C, Kollert W, Lebedys A (2014) Assessment of industrial roundwood production from planted forests. FAO planted forests and trees working paper FP/48/E. Rome. Available at: http://www.fao.org/forestry/plantedforests/67508@170537/en/
  41. Kawaletz H, Mölder I, Zerbe S, Annighöfer P, Terwei A, Ammer C (2013) Exotic tree seedlings are much more competitive than natives but show underyielding when growing together. J Plant Ecol 6:305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kjær ED, Lobo A, Myking T (2014) The role of exotic tree species in Nordic forestry. Scand J Forest Res 29:323–332.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.926098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krakowski K, Stoehr M (2009) Coastal Douglas-fir provenance variation: patterns and predictions for British Columbia seed transfer. Ann For Sci 66:811–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larjavaara M (2008) A review on benefits and disadvantages of tree diversity. Open For Sci J 1:24–26.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874398600801010024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mason WL, Zhu JJ (2013) Silviculture of planted forests managed for multi-functional objectives: lessons from Chinese and British experiences. In: Fenning T (ed) Challenges and opportunities for the world’s forests in the 21st century. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 37–54Google Scholar
  46. Payn T, Carnus JM, Smith PF, Kimberley M, Kollert W, Liu S et al (2015) Changes in planted forests and future global implications. For Ecol Manage 352:57–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pelleri F, Ravagni S, Bianchetto E, Bidini C (2013) Comparing growth rate in a mixed plantation (walnut, poplar and nurse trees) with different planting designs: results from an experimental plantation in northern Italy. Ann Silvicultural Res 37(1):13–21Google Scholar
  48. Schmidtling RC, Myszewski JH (2003) Effect of large-scale movement of loblolly pine seed on genetic integrity of the species in its natural range. In: Beaulieu J (ed) Proceedings of the symposium of the North American forest commission, forest genetic resources and silviculture working groups, and the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), September 21, Quebec City, pp 43–48Google Scholar
  49. Sedjo R, Botkin D (1997) Using forest plantations to spare natural forests. Environment 39(10):14–20Google Scholar
  50. Silva LN, Freer-Smith P, Madsen P (2018) Production, restoration, mitigation: a new generation of plantations. New For.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9644-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stanturf JA, Palik BJ, Dumroese RK (2014) Contemporary forest restoration: a review emphasizing function. Forest Ecol Manag 331:292–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stilinović S (1991) Afforestation. Naučna knjiga, Belgrade. University book. 274 p. [In Serbian]Google Scholar
  53. Tani A, Maltoni A, Mariotti B, Buresti Lattes E (2006) Juglans regia L. tree plantations for wood production in mining area of S. Barbara (AR): evaluation of N-fixing accessory trees effect. Forest 3(4):588–597.  https://doi.org/10.3832/efor0407-0030588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas E, Jalonen R, Loo J, Boshier D, Gallo L, Cavers S, Bozzano M (2014) Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. For Ecol Manag 333:66–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Villar-Salvador P (2016) Restoration of Spanish pine plantations: a main challenge for the 21st century. Reforesta 1:53–66.  https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.1.04.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang D, Stanturf JA (2008) Forest plantations. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath BD (editors-in-chief), Ecosystems. Vol. [2] of Encyclopedia of ecology. Elsevier, Oxford. 5: 1673–1680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00331-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Anabela Marisa Azul
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Neuroscience and Cell BiologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal