Introduction
Security is an essentially contested term with an even broader and heated debate (Gallie 1956). Security, in terms of conception and practice, is inherently a normative activity. The pursuit of security is often regarded as a priority task for supranational, national, and subnational actors within the international system, and portrayed as being driven by structural aspects or actor imperatives (Mearsheimer 2019). However, there is nothing automatic or natural about security. That is, security is bound up with the (perceived) need to make choices as one looks to secure a particular object against a particular threat or set of threats. It is within these adoptions – themselves up for debate but often made implicitly – that the ethics of security are revealed. Ignoring these choices, and neglecting their consequences, does not make security any less ethics bound; rather, it merely means that one is dealing with it in an inattentive fashion.
This entry is structured around a...
References
Adamson, F. B. (2020). Pushing the boundaries: Can we “decolonize” security studies? Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(1), 129–135.
Alexseev, M. (2016). Backing the USSR 2.0: Russia’s ethnic minorities and expansionist ethnic Russian nationalism. In P. Kolstø & H. Blakkisrud (Eds.), The new Russian nationalism: Imperialism, ethnicity and authoritarianism 2000–2015 (pp. 160–191). Edinburgh University Press.
Ayoob, M. (1991). The security problematic of the third word. World Politics, 43(2), 257–283.
Bove, V., Efthyvoulou, G., & Navas, A. (2017). Political cycles in public expenditure: Butter vs guns. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(3), 582–604.
Burke, A., Lee-Koo, K., & McDonald, M. (2016). An ethics of global security. Journal of Global Security Studies, 1(1), 64–79.
Christen, M., Gordijn, B., & Loi, M. (Eds.). (2019). The ethics of cybersecurity. Cham: Springer.
Eisenstat, Y. (2019, February 12). The real reason tech struggles with algorithmic bias. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/the-real-reason-tech-struggles-with-algorithmic-bias/
Elbe, S. (2005). AIDS, security, biopolitics. International Relations, 19(4), 403–419.
Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56(1), 167–198.
Hayes, P., van de Poel, I., & Steen, M. (2020). Algorithms and values in justice and security. AI & SOCIETY, 35(3), 533–555.
Hoogensen, G., & Rottem, S. V. (2004). Gender identity and the subject of security. Security Dialogue, 35(2), 155–171.
McCormack, T. (2011). The limits to emancipation in the human security framework. In D. Chandler & N. Hynek (Eds.), Critical perspectives on human security (pp. 99–113). London: Routledge.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the Liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7–50.
Menon, R. (2013, June 20). The fatal flaws of R2P. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/the-fatal-flaws-of-r2p/
Mitchell, A. (2016). Posthuman security/ethics. In J. Nyman & A. Burke (Eds.), Ethical security studies: A new research agenda (pp. 60–72). Abingdon: Routledge.
Persaud, R. B., & Walker, R. B. J. (2001). Apertura: Race in international relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 26(4), 373–376.
Romaniuk, S. N., & Grice, F. (2018). Norm contestation, political assassinations, and targeted killings. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/11/05/norm-contestation-political-assassinations-and-targeted-killings/
Romaniuk, S. N., & Njoku, E. T. (Eds.). (2021). Counter-terrorism and civil society post-9/11 progress and challenges. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Oxford: University of Chicago Press.
Schwenkenbecher, A. (2014). Collateral damage and the principle of due care. Journal of Military Ethics, 13(1), 94–105.
Shilliam, R. (2020). Race and racism in international relations: Retrieving a scholarly inheritance. International Politics Reviews, 8(2), 152–195.
Ukraine conflict: Moscow could “defend” Russia-backed rebels. (2021, April 9). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56678665
UN. (2017). Treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVI-9&chapter=26
UNDP. (1994). Human development report 1994. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Warner, J., & Boas, I. (2019). Securitization of climate change: How invoking global dangers for instrumental ends can backfire. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(8), 1471–1488.
Weiss, T. (2011). The blurring border between the police and the military: A debate without foundations. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(3), 396–405.
Wheeler, N. J. (2010). Saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Further Reading
Burke, A. (2006). Beyond security, ethics and violence: War against the other. Routledge.
Burke, A., & Nyman, J. (Eds.). (2016). Ethical security studies: A new research agenda. Routledge.
Dobos, N. (2020). Ethics, security, and the war machine: The true cost of the military. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hadjimatheou, K., Sorell, T., and Guelke, J. (eds.). (2017). Security ethics. Routledge.
Leese, M., Lidén, K., & Nikolova, B. (2018). Putting critique to work: Ethics in EU security research. Security Dialogue, 50(1), 59–76.
Manjikian, M. (2017). Cybersecurity ethics: An introduction. Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ankersen, C., Romaniuk, S.N. (2021). Ethics of Security. In: Romaniuk, S., Marton, P. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_41-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_41-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74336-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74336-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences