Skip to main content

Ethics of Security

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies

Introduction

Security is an essentially contested term with an even broader and heated debate (Gallie 1956). Security, in terms of conception and practice, is inherently a normative activity. The pursuit of security is often regarded as a priority task for supranational, national, and subnational actors within the international system, and portrayed as being driven by structural aspects or actor imperatives (Mearsheimer 2019). However, there is nothing automatic or natural about security. That is, security is bound up with the (perceived) need to make choices as one looks to secure a particular object against a particular threat or set of threats. It is within these adoptions – themselves up for debate but often made implicitly – that the ethics of security are revealed. Ignoring these choices, and neglecting their consequences, does not make security any less ethics bound; rather, it merely means that one is dealing with it in an inattentive fashion.

This entry is structured around a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamson, F. B. (2020). Pushing the boundaries: Can we “decolonize” security studies? Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(1), 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexseev, M. (2016). Backing the USSR 2.0: Russia’s ethnic minorities and expansionist ethnic Russian nationalism. In P. Kolstø & H. Blakkisrud (Eds.), The new Russian nationalism: Imperialism, ethnicity and authoritarianism 2000–2015 (pp. 160–191). Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoob, M. (1991). The security problematic of the third word. World Politics, 43(2), 257–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bove, V., Efthyvoulou, G., & Navas, A. (2017). Political cycles in public expenditure: Butter vs guns. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(3), 582–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, A., Lee-Koo, K., & McDonald, M. (2016). An ethics of global security. Journal of Global Security Studies, 1(1), 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christen, M., Gordijn, B., & Loi, M. (Eds.). (2019). The ethics of cybersecurity. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstat, Y. (2019, February 12). The real reason tech struggles with algorithmic bias. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/the-real-reason-tech-struggles-with-algorithmic-bias/

  • Elbe, S. (2005). AIDS, security, biopolitics. International Relations, 19(4), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56(1), 167–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, P., van de Poel, I., & Steen, M. (2020). Algorithms and values in justice and security. AI & SOCIETY, 35(3), 533–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogensen, G., & Rottem, S. V. (2004). Gender identity and the subject of security. Security Dialogue, 35(2), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, T. (2011). The limits to emancipation in the human security framework. In D. Chandler & N. Hynek (Eds.), Critical perspectives on human security (pp. 99–113). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the Liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, R. (2013, June 20). The fatal flaws of R2P. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/the-fatal-flaws-of-r2p/

  • Mitchell, A. (2016). Posthuman security/ethics. In J. Nyman & A. Burke (Eds.), Ethical security studies: A new research agenda (pp. 60–72). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Persaud, R. B., & Walker, R. B. J. (2001). Apertura: Race in international relations. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 26(4), 373–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romaniuk, S. N., & Grice, F. (2018). Norm contestation, political assassinations, and targeted killings. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/11/05/norm-contestation-political-assassinations-and-targeted-killings/

  • Romaniuk, S. N., & Njoku, E. T. (Eds.). (2021). Counter-terrorism and civil society post-9/11 progress and challenges. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Oxford: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwenkenbecher, A. (2014). Collateral damage and the principle of due care. Journal of Military Ethics, 13(1), 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilliam, R. (2020). Race and racism in international relations: Retrieving a scholarly inheritance. International Politics Reviews, 8(2), 152–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukraine conflict: Moscow could “defend” Russia-backed rebels. (2021, April 9). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56678665

  • UN. (2017). Treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVI-9&chapter=26

  • UNDP. (1994). Human development report 1994. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J., & Boas, I. (2019). Securitization of climate change: How invoking global dangers for instrumental ends can backfire. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(8), 1471–1488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. (2011). The blurring border between the police and the military: A debate without foundations. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(3), 396–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, N. J. (2010). Saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Burke, A. (2006). Beyond security, ethics and violence: War against the other. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, A., & Nyman, J. (Eds.). (2016). Ethical security studies: A new research agenda. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobos, N. (2020). Ethics, security, and the war machine: The true cost of the military. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjimatheou, K., Sorell, T., and Guelke, J. (eds.). (2017). Security ethics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leese, M., Lidén, K., & Nikolova, B. (2018). Putting critique to work: Ethics in EU security research. Security Dialogue, 50(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manjikian, M. (2017). Cybersecurity ethics: An introduction. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Ankersen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ankersen, C., Romaniuk, S.N. (2021). Ethics of Security. In: Romaniuk, S., Marton, P. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_41-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_41-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74336-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74336-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics