# Agent-Based Computational Economics

**DOI:**https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_6-7

- 332 Downloads

## Definition of the Subject

Mainstream economic models typically make the assumption that an entire group of agents, e.g., “investors,” can be modeled with a single “rational representative agent.” While this assumption has proven extremely useful in advancing the science of economics by yielding analytically tractable models, it is clear that the assumption is not realistic: people are different one from the other in their tastes, beliefs, and sophistication, and as many psychological studies have shown, they often deviate from rationality in systematic ways.

Agent-based computational economics is a framework allowing economics to expand beyond the realm of the “rational representative agent.” Modeling and simulating the behavior of each agent and the interaction among agents agent-based simulation allows us to investigate the dynamics of complex economic systems with many heterogeneous and not necessarily fully rational agents.

The agent-based simulation approach allows economists to...

## Keywords

microscopic simulation agent-based simulation financial markets bounded rationality heterogeneous expectations## Bibliography

## Primary Literature

- Admati A, Pfleiderer P (1988) A theory of intraday patterns: volume and price variability. Rev Financ Stud 1:3–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arthur WB (1994) Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality (The El Farol problem). Am Econ Rev 84:406–411Google Scholar
- Arthur WB, Holland JH, Lebaron B, Palmer RG, Tayler P (1997) Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. In: Arthur WB, Durlauf S, Lane D (eds) The economy as an evolving complex system II. Addison-Wesley, Redwood CityGoogle Scholar
- Brock WA, Hommes CA (1998) Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. J Econ Dyn Control 22:1235–1274MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Egenter E, Lux T, Stauffer D (1999) Finite size effects in Monte Carlo simulations of two stock market models. Phys A 268:250–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Epstein JM, Axtell RL (1996) Complex adaptive systems. In: Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. MIT Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Fama E, French K (1988) Permanent and temporary components of stock prices. J Polit Econ 96:246–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Friend I, Blume ME (1975) The demand for risky assets. Am Econ Rev 65:900–922Google Scholar
- Gordon J, Paradis GE, Rorke CH (1972) Experimental evidence on alternative portfolio decision rules. Am Econ Rev 62(1):107–118Google Scholar
- Grossman S, Stiglitz J (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Am Econ Rev 70:393–408Google Scholar
- Hellthaler T (1995) The influence of investor number on a microscopic market. Int J Mod Phys C 6:845–852CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Hommes CH (2002) Modeling the stylized facts in finance through simple nonlinear adaptive systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:7221–7228CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Jegadeesh N, Titman S (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. J Finance 48:65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karpoff J (1987) The relationship between price changes and trading volume: a survey. J Finance Quant Anal 22:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim GW, Markowitz HM (1989) Investment rules, margin, and market volatility. J Portf Manage 16:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kirman AP (1992) Whom or what does the representative agent represent? J Econ Perspect 6:117–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kohl R (1997) The influence of the number of different stocks on the Levy, Levy Solomon model. Int J Mod Phys C 8:1309–1316CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Kroll Y, Levy H, Rapoport A (1988) Experimental tests of the separation theorem and the capital asset pricing model. Am Econ Rev 78:500–519Google Scholar
- LeBaron B (2000) Agent-based computational finance: suggested readings and early research. J Econ Dyn Control 24:679–702CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Levy H (1994) Absolute and relative risk aversion: an experimental study. J Risk Uncertain 8:289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Levy H, Lim KC (1998) The economic significance of the cross-sectional autoregressive model: further analysis. Rev Quant Finance Account 11:37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Levy M, Levy H (1996) The danger of assuming homogeneous expectations. Finance Analyst J 52:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Levy M, Levy H, Solomon S (1994) A microscopic model of the stock market: cycles, booms, and crashes. Econom Lett 45:103–111CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Levy M, Levy H, Solomon S (2000) Microscopic simulation of financial markets. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Levy M, Persky N, Solomon S (1996) The complex dyn of a simple stock market model. Int J High Speed Comput 8:93–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lux T (1995) Herd behaviour, bubbles and crashes. Econ J 105:881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lux T (1998) The socio-economic dynamics of speculative bubbles: interacting agents, chaos, and the fat tails of returns distributions. J Econ Behav Organ 33:143–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lux T, Marchesi M (1999) Volatility clustering in financial markets: a micro-simulation of interacting agents. Nature 397:498CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Orcutt GH, Caldwell SB, Wertheimer R (1976) Policy exploration through microanalytic simulation. The Urban Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Palmer RG, Arthur WB, Holland JH, LeBaron B, Tayler P (1994) Artificial economic life: a simple model of a stock market. Phys D 75:264–274CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Poterba JM, Summers LH (1988) Mean reversion in stock returns: evidence and implications. J Finance Econ 22:27–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Samanidou E, Zschischang E, Stauffer D, Lux T (2007) Agent-based models of financial markets. Rep Prog Phys 70:409–450CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Samuelson PA (1989) The judgement of economic science on rational portfolio management: timing and long horizon effects. J Portf Manage 16:4–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Samuelson PA (1994) The long term case for equities and how it can be oversold. J Portf Manag 21:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sargent T (1993) Bounded rationality and macroeconomics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Schelling TC (1978) Micro motives and macro behavior. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Shiller RJ (1981) Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? Am Econ Rev 71:421–436Google Scholar
- Stauffer D, de Oliveira PMC, Bernardes AT (1999) Monte Carlo simulation of volatility correlation in microscopic market model. Int J Theor Appl Finance 2:83–94CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tesfatsion L (2001) Special issue on agent-based computational economics. J Econ Dyn Control 25:281–293CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tesfatsion L (2002) Agent-based computational economics: growing economies from the bottom up. Artif Life 8:55–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thaler R (ed) (1993) Advances in behavioral finance. Russel Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Thaler R (1994) Quasi rational economics. Russel Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–480MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
- Tversky A, Kahneman D (1986) Rational choice and the framing of decision. J Bus 59(4):251–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 5:297–323CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

## Books and Reviews

- Anderson PW, Arrow J, Pines D (eds) (1988) The economy as an evolving complex system. Addison-Wesley, Redwood CityzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Axelrod R (1997) The complexity of cooperation: agent-based models of conflict and cooperation. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Moss de Oliveira S, de Oliveira H, Stauffer D (1999) Evolution, money, war and computers. BG Teubner, Stuttgart/LeipzigCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Solomon S (1995) The microscopic representation of complex macroscopic phenomena. In: Stauffer D (ed) Annu Rev Comput Phys II. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar