Skip to main content

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Urinary Tract

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Pediatric Surgery

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is evolving as an imaging modality for the urinary tract that offers not only superior anatomic but also functional assessment, without the use of ionizing radiation. This comprehensive evaluation of the urinary tract allows for diagnosis of numerous urologic anomalies including ureteropelvic junction obstruction, duplication anomalies, ectopic ureters, and megaureters. Parameters obtained during magnetic resonance urography such as differential renal function, calyceal, and renal transit time help aid in decision making regarding surgical and medical management of these various urologic conditions. This chapter will discuss the technique of magnetic resonance urography (MRU), as well as clinical applications. While MRU is currently more commonly used in cases where conventional imaging modalities fail to fully define complex urologic anatomy and function, it has the potential to become the preferred first-line radiologic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altun E, Martin DR, Wertman R, Lugo-Somolinos A, Fuller ER, Semelka RC. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: change in incidence following a switch in gadolinium agents and adoption of a gadolinium policy – report from two U.S. universities. Radiology. 2009;253(3):689–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arlen AM, Kirsch AJ, Cuda SP, Little SB, Jones RA, Grattan-Smith JD, Cerwinka WH. Magnetic resonance urography for diagnosis of pediatric ureteral stricture. J Pediatr Urol. 2014; article in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campo I, Sertorio F, Wong M, Anfigeno L, Bertolotto M, Mattioli G, Damasio MB. Magnetic resonance urography of congenital abnormalities – what the radiologist needs to know. Pediatr Radiol. 2022;52(5):985–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cerwinka WH, Kirsch AJ. Magnetic resonance urography in pediatric urology. Curr Opin Urol. 2010;20:323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cerwinka WH, Grattan-Smith JD, Kirsch AJ. Magnetic resonance urography in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4:74–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cerwinka WH, Grattan-Smith JD, Jones RA, Haber M, Little SB, Blews DE, Williams JP, Kirsch AJ. Comparison of magnetic resonance urography to dimercaptosuccinic acid scan for the identification of renal parenchyma defects in children with vesicoureteral reflux. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:344–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan SS, Ntoulia A, Khrichenko D, Back SJ, Tasian GE, Dillman JR, Darge K. Role of magnetic resonance urography in pediatric renal fusion anomalies. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(13):1707–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darge K, Anupindi SA, Jaramillo D. MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis in infants, children, and adolescents. Radiology. 2011;261:12–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darge K, Higgins M, Hwang TJ, Delgado J, Shukla A, Bellah R. Magnetic resonance and computed tomography in pediatric urology: an imaging overview for current and future daily practice. Radiol Clin N Am. 2013;51:583–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epelman M, Daneman A, Donnelly LF, Averill LW, Chauvin NA. Neonatal imaging evaluation of common prenatally diagnosed genitourinary abnormalities. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004;35(6):528–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa VH, Chavhan GB, Oudjhane K, Farhat W. Utility of MR urography in children suspected of having ectopic ureter. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44:956–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gee MS, Bittman M, Epelman M, Vargas SO, Lee EY. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric kidney: benign and malignant masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013;21:697–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Smith JD, Perez-Brayfield MR, Jones RA, Little S, Broecker B, Smith EA, Scherz HC, Kirsch AJ. MR imaging of kidneys: functional evaluation using F-15 perfusion imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33:293–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Smith JD, Little SB, Jones RA. MR urography in children: how we do it. Pediatr Radiol. 2008a;38:3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Smith JD, Little SB, Jones RA. MR urography evaluation of obstructive uropathy. Pediatr Radiol. 2008b;38:49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • High WA, Ayers RA, Chandler J, Zito G, Cowper SE. Gadolinium is detectable within the tissue of patients with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56:21–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt CH, Harman RP, Hesley GK. Frequency and severity of adverse effects of iodinated and gadolinium contrast materials: retrospective review of 456930 doses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1124–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RA, Grattan-Smith JD, Little S. Pediatric magnetic resonance urography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:510–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kern S, Zimmerhackl LB, Hildebrandt F, Ermisch-Omran B, Uhl M. Appearance of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease in magnetic resonance imaging and RARE-MR-urography. Pediatr Radiol. 2000;30:156–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch AJ, Grattan-Smith JD. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric urinary tract. In: Gearhart JP, Rink RC, Mouriquand PDE, editors. Pediatric urology. 2nd ed. WB Saunders; 2010. p. 162–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch AJ, Grattan-Smith JD, Molitierno JA. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric urology. Curr Opin Urol. 2006a;16:283–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch AJ, McMann LP, Jones RA, Smith EA, Scherz HC, Grattan-Smith JD. Magnetic resonance urography for evaluating outcomes after pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2006b;176:1755–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koçyiğit A, Yüksel S, Bayram R, Yılmaz İ, Karabulut N. Efficacy of magnetic resonance urography in detecting renal scars in children with vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(7):1215–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavinio A, Harding S, Van Der Boogaard F, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Richards HK, Pickard JD, Czosnyka Z. Magnetic field interactions in adjustable hydrocephalus shunts. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;2:222–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SK, Chang Y, Park NH, Kim YH, Wood S. Magnetic resonance voiding cystography in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux: comparative study with voiding cystourethrography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:406–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lonergan GJ, Pennington DJ, Morrison JC, Haws RM, Grimley MS, Kao TC. Childhood pyelonephritis: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and renal cortical scintigraphy for diagnosis. Radiology. 1998;207:377–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMann LP, Kirsch AJ, Scherz HC, Smith EA, Jones RA, Shehata BM, Kozielski R, Grattan-Smith JD. Magnetic resonance urography in the evaluation of prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis and renal dysgenesis. J Urol. 2006;176:1786–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Neururer R, Peschel R, Colleselli D, Aigner F, Gradl J, Bartsch G, Strasser H, Pallwein L, Frauscher F. Comparison of contrast-enhanced color doppler imaging (CDI), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of crossing vessels in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Eur Urol. 2008;53:1254–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafavi MR, Prasad PV, Saltzman B. Magnetic resonance urography and angiography in the evaluation of a horseshoe kidney with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology. 1998;51(3):484–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy KJ, Brunberg JA, Cohan RH. Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: a review of 36 cases. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:847–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983;3:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payabvash S, Kajbafzadeh AM, Saeedi P, Sadeghi Z, Elmi A, Mehdizadeh M. Application of magnetic resonance urography in diagnosis of congenital urogenital anomalies in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24:979–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Brayfield MR, Kirsch AJ, Jones RA, Grattan-Smith JD. A prospective study comparing ultrasound, nuclear scintigraphy and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2003;170:1330–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters AM. Graphical analysis of dynamic data: the Patlak-Rutland plot. Nucl Med Commun. 1994;15:669–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renjen P, Bellah R, Hellinger JC, Darge K. Advances in uroradiologic imaging in children. Radiol Clin N Am. 2012;50:207–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riccabona M, Riccabona M, Koen M, Beckers G, Schindler M, Heinisch M, Maier C, Lansteger W, Lusuardi L. Magnetic resonance urography: a new gold standard for the evaluation of solitary kidneys and renal buds? J Urol. 2004a;171:1642–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riccabona M, Ruppert-Kohlmayr A, Ekkehard R, Maier C, Lusuardi L, Riccabona M. Potential impact of pediatric MR urography on the imaging algorithm in patients with a functional single kidney. Am J Roentgenol. 2004b;183:795–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez LV, Spielman D, Herfkens RJ, Shortliffe LD. Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of hydronephrosis, reflux and renal scarring in children. J Urol. 2001;166:1023–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Runge VM. Safety of magnetic resonance contrast media. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;12:309–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sizonov VV, Kogan MI, Shidaev AK, Redkin VA, Orlov VM, Piskunov KP. Comparison of functional magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy in the functional assessment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Urologiia. 2021;1:90–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staatz G, Rohrmann D, Nolte-Ernsting CCA, Stollbrink C, Haage P, Schmidt T, Gunther RW. Magnetic resonance urography in children: evaluation of suspected ureteral ectopia in duplex systems. J Urol. 2001;166:2346–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasanawala SS, Kenedy WA, Ganguly A, Fahrig R, Rieke V, Daniel B, Barth RA. MR voiding cystography for evaluation of vesicoureteral reflux. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(5):206–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viteri B, Calle-Toro JS, Ballester L, Darge K, Furth S, Khrichenko D, Van Batavia J, Otero H. Potential benefits of functional magnetic resonance urography (fMRU) over MAG3 renal scan in children with obstructive uropathy. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(5):659.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiser AC, Amukele SA, Leonidas JC, Palmer LS. The role of gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for children with suspected acute pyelonephritis. J Urol. 2003;169:2308–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wille S, von Knobloch R, Klose KJ, Heidenreich A, Hofmann R. Magnetic resonance urography in pediatric urology. Scan J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37:16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Broderick Boren, K.M., Grattan-Smith, J.D., Kirsch, A.J. (2022). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Urinary Tract. In: Puri, P. (eds) Pediatric Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_167-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_167-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38482-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38482-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics