Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phimosis and Buried Penis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Pediatric Surgery

  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the development of the foreskin, the abnormalities that are features of this normal development, and acquired pathologies in children. The surgery of the prepuce, which is principally circumcision, forms the final subject of the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altemus AR, Hutchins GM. Development of the human anterior urethra. J Urol. 1991;146:1085–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alter GJ, Horton CE, Horton CE Jr. Buried penis as a contraindication for circumcision. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;178:487–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeson PS, Hopkin RJ, Bailey RB Jr, et al. The inconspicuous penis. Pediatrics. 1993;92:794–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barone JG, Fleisher MH. Treatment of paraphimosis using the “puncture” technique [see comments]. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993;9:298–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bale PM, Lochhead A, Martin HC, Gollow I. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in children. Pediatr Pathol. 1987;7:617–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craig JC, Knight JF, Sureshkumar P, et al. Effect of circumcision on incidence of urinary tract infection in preschool boys. J Pediatr. 1996;128:23–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill D, Rane A. Reduction of paraphimosis with granulated sugar [Letter; Comment]. BJU Int. 1999;83:362.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers RJ, Burton PA, Bennett RF, et al. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus: a common and distinctive cause of phimosis in boys. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:1025–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley IP. Ritual circumcision (Umkhwetha) amongst the Xhosa of the Ciskei. Br J Urol. 1990;66:318–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Celis S, Reed F, Murphy F, Adams S, Gillick J, Abdelhafeez AH, Lopez PJ. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in children and adolescents: a literature review and clinical series. J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Feb;10(1):34–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Miguel C, Muñoz-Serrano A, Amesty V, Rivas S, Lobato R, López-Pereira P, Martínez Urrutia MJ. Buried penis surgical treatment in children: Dorsal dartos flap VS. Fascia fixation. A retrospective cohort study. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(2):185.e1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeVries CR, Miller AK, Packer MG. Reduction of paraphimosis with hyaluronidase [see comments]. Urology. 1996;48:464–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deibert GA. The separation of the prepuce in the human penis. Anat Rec. 1933;57:387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escala JM, Rickwood AM. Balanitis. Br J Urol. 1989;63:196–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser IA, Allen MJ, Bagshaw PF, Johnstone MA. Randomised trial of childhood circumcision with the Plastibel device compared to a conventional dissection technique. Br J Surg. 1981b;68:593–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser IA, Allen MJ, Bagshaw PF, Johnstone M. A randomized trial to assess childhood circumcision with the Plastibell device compared to a conventional dissection technique. Br J Surg. 1981a;68:593–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson DM, Lawton JM, Shannon FT. Neonatal circumcision and penile problems: an 8-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 1988;81:537–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank JD, Pocock RD, Stower MJ. Urethral strictures in childhood. Br J Urol. 1988;62:590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fornasa CV, Calabro A, Miglietta A, et al. Mild balanoposthitis. Genitourin Med. 1994;70:345–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DM, Atwell JD, Freeman NV. A prospective study of the indications and morbidity of circumcision in children. Eur Urol. 1985b;11:184–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg CM, McCracken GM. Urinary tract infections in young infants. Pediatrics. 1982;69:409–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DM, Atwell JD, Freeman NV. A prospective survey of the indications and morbidity of circumcision in children. Eur Urol. 1985a;11:184–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths D, Frank JD. Inappropriate circumcision referrals by GPs. J R Soc Med. 1992;85:324–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin. BMJ. 1949;2:1433–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harnes JR. The foreskin saga. J Am Med Assoc. 1971;217:1241–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog LW, Alvarez SR. The frequency of foreskin problems in uncircumcised children. Am J Dis Child. 1986;140:254–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jayakumar S, Antao B, Bevington O, Furness P, Ninan GK. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in children and its incidence under the age of 5 years. J Pediatr Urol. 2012 Jun;8(3):272–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph VT. A new approach to the surgical correction of buried penis. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30:727–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaweblum YA, Press S, Kogan L, et al. Circumcision using the Mogen clamp. Clin Pediatr. 1984;23:679–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan GW. Complications of circumcision. Urol Clin North Am. 1983;10:543–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenawi MM. The webbed penis. Br J Urol. 1973;45:569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koo HP, Duckett JW. Circumcision Quo Vadis? In: Williams DI, Etker S, editors. Contemporary issues in pediatric urology, in Memorium Herbert B. Eckstein, Istanbul. Logos; 1996. p. 149–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindhagen T. Topical clobetasol propionate compared with placebo in the treatment of unretractable foreskin. Eur J Surg. 1996;162:969–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meuli M, Briner J, Hanimann B, Sacher P. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus causing phimosis in boys: a prospective study with 5-year followup after complete circumcision. J Urol. 1994;152:987–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy D, Douglas JWB, Mogford C. Circumcision in a national sample of 4-year-old children. Br Med J. 1952:ii755–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin: incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys. Arch Dis Child. 1968;43:200–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterlinck W. Unbloody management of penile zipper injury. Eur Urol. 1981;7:365–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien TR, Calle EE, Poole WK. Incidence of neonatal circumcision in Atlanta, 1985-1986. South Med J. 1995;88:411–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persad R, Sharma S, McTavish J, et al. Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of meatal stenosis following circumcision. Br J Urol. 1995;75:91–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rickwood AM, Hemalatha V, Batcup G, Spitz L. Phimosis in boys. Br J Urol. 1980;52:147–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rickwood AM, Walker J. Is phimosis overdiagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989;71:275–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy MU, Rance CH. Surgical correction of congenital megaprepuce. Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15:593–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smeulders N, Wilcox DT, Cuckow PM. The buried penis: an anatomical approach. BJU Int. 2000;86:523–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stenram A, Malmfors G, Okmian L. Circumcision for phimosis: a follow-up study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1986b;20:89–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh-Grewal D, Macdessi J, Craig J. Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(8):853–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman J, Ben-Hur N, Neuman Z. Surgical complications of circumcision. Am J Dis Child. 1964;107:149–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stenram A, Malmfors G, Okiman L. Circumcision for phimosis: a follow-up study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1986a;20:89–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiswell TE, Smith FR, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics. 1985;75:901–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiswell TE, John K. Lattimer lecture: prepuce presence portends prevalence of potentially perilous periurethral pathogens. J Urol. 1992;148:739–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiswell TE, Miller GM, Gelston HM Jr, et al. Effect of circumcision status on periurethral bacterial flora during the first year of life. J Pediatr. 1988;113:442–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams N, Chell J, Kapila L. Why are children referred for circumcision? BMJ. 1993;306:28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wollin M, Duffy PG, Malone PS, Ransley PG. Buried penis: a novel approach. Br J Urol. 1990;65:97–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahyudi I, Hadiansyah H, Situmorang GR, Rodjani A. Risk factors for surgical complications and short-term outcomes evaluation after novel method of buried penis correction: a single-center experience. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;S1477-5131(22):00166–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip A, Ng SK, Wong WC, et al. Injury to the prepuce. Br J Urol. 1989;63:535–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Paediatric Urology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK

    Navroop Johal & Peter Cuckow

Authors
  1. Navroop Johal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Cuckow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Beacon Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Prem Puri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Johal, N., Cuckow, P. (2022). Phimosis and Buried Penis. In: Puri, P. (eds) Pediatric Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_190-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_190-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38482-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38482-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation