Skip to main content

Augmentation Cystoplasty

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Pediatric Surgery

Abstract

Bladder augmentation (BA) with GI tissue is an important tool in the armamentarium of the urologist in the management of children requiring reconstruction for urinary incontinence, preserving the upper urinary tract, and reconstructions for severe congenital malformations. The main goal of bladder augmentation is a creation of a low-pressure urinary reservoir in order to maintain renal function and to avoid urinary incontinence. After introduction of clean intermitted catheterization to the clinical practice, augmentation cystoplasty (AC) with various intestinal segments grew rapidly and changed the management of pediatric and adult patients with abnormal bladder function. The current techniques for pediatric BA are cystoplasty with stomach, large bowel, small bowel, ileocecal, ureter, and engineered tissue with or without urinary continence procedures. Gastrointestinal tissue used for enterocystoplasty is associated with various short- and long-term complications, and the search for the ideal tissue is still ongoing (Adams et al. 1988; Hitchcock et al. 1994; Perovic et al. 2000). Reservoir perforation must be considered in patients with acute abdominal pain or peritonitis, and long-term follow-up of renal function is needed. The practicing urologists and pediatric surgeons have to be aware of the long-term risk of malignancy in these procedures. Therefore, there is a current necessity to develop alternative tissues for bladder augmentation by the help of tissue engineering protocols that will replace the integration of bowel segments into the urinary tract. Until then, intestinal cystoplasty still seems to be the gold standard due to the lack of promising alternative options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams MC, Joseph DB. Urinary tract reconstruction in Children. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, et al., editors. Cambell’s urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2012. p. 3457–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams W, Shortliffe L. Management of delayed bladder augmentation perforation. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006;3:341–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adams MC, Mitchell ME, Rink RC. Gastrocystoplasty: an alternative solution to the problem of urological reconstruction in the severely compromised patient. J Urol. 1988;140:1152–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andolfi C, Kumar R, Boysen WR, Gundeti MS. Current status of robotic Surgery in pediatric urology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29(2):159–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arlen AM, Merriman LS, Elmore JM, Smith EA, Kirsch AJ. Rapid construction of sigmoid bladder augmentation using absorbable staples: long-term results and comparison to standard colocystoplasty in children with neurogenic bladder. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:284–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atala A, Bauer SB, Soker S, et al. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patient needing cystoplasty. Lancet. 2006;367:1241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin JC. Long-term risks of bladder augmentation in pediatric patients. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:408–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin JC, Elliot S, Cooper CS. Patients with spina bifida and bladder cancer: atypical presentation, advanced stage, and poor survival. J Urol. 2007;178:798–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barker G, Lackgren G, Stenberg A, Arnell K. Distal shunt obstruction in children with myelomeningocele after bladder perforation. J Urol. 2006;176:1726–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biers SM, Venn SN, Greenwell TJ. The past, present and future of augmentation cystoplasty. BJU Int. 2012;109:1280-93.12

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylu U, Horasanli K, Tanriverdi O, Kendirci M, Gumus E, Miroglu C. Evaluation of bone mineral density after ileocystoplasty in children with and without myelomeningocele. Pediatr Surg Int. 2006;22(4):375–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brkovic D, Linke J, Jakse G, Bauss F. Changes in bone structure after augmentation cystoplasty in chronic uraemic rats. BJU Int. 2005;95:1066–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright PC. Snow BW Bladder autoaugmentation: early clinical experience. J Urol. 1989a;142(2 Pt 2):505–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright PC. Snow BW Bladder autoaugmentation: partial detrusor excision to augment the bladder without use of bowel. J Urol. 1989b;142(4):1050–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castellan M, Gosalbez R, Perez-Brayfield M, et al. Tumor in bladder reservoir after gastrocystoplasty. J Urol. 2007;178:1771–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Badiola F, Ruiz E, Puigdevall J, Lobos P, Moldes J, Lopez Raffo M, et al. Sigmoid cystoplasty with argon beam without mucosa. J Urol. 2001;165(6 Pt2):2253–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeFoor W, Minevich E, Reeves D, et al. Gastrocystoplasty: long-term followup. J Urol. 2003a;170:1647–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeFoor W, Tackett L, Minevich E, et al. Risk factors for spontaneous bladder perforation after augmentation cystoplasty. Urology. 2003b;62:737–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeFoor W, Minevich E, Reddy P, et al. Bladder calculi after augmentation cystoplasty: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Urol. 2004;172:1964–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dik P, Klijn AJ, van Gool JD, de Jong-de Vos van Steenwijk CC, de Jong TP. Early start to therapy preserves kidney function in spina bifida patients. Eur Urol. 2006;49:908–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duckett JW, Snyder HMIII. Use of Mitrofanoff principle in urinary reconstruction. Urol Clin North Am. 1986;13:271–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duel BP, Gonzalez R, Barthold JS. Alternative techniques for augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol. 1998;159:998–1005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duthie JB, Vincent M, Herbison GP, Wilson DI, Wilson D. Botulinum toxin injections for adults with overactive bladder syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder JS, Snyder HM, Hulbert WC, et al. Perforation of the augmented bladder in patients undergoing clean intermittent catheterization. J Urol. 1988;140:1159–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gold BD, Bhoopalam PS, Reifen RM, et al. Gastrointestinal complications of gastrocystoplasty. Arch Die Child. 1992;61:1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González R, Ludwikowski BM. Alternatives to conventional enterocystoplasty in children: a critical review of urodynamic outcomes. Front Pediatric. 2013;25:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez R, Buson H, Reid C, Reinberg Y. Seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium: experience with 16 patients. Urology. 1995;45(1):124–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gosalbez R Jr, Woodard JR, Bmecker BH, Parrott TS, Massad C. The use of stomach in pediatric urinary reconstruction. J Urol. 1993;150:438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gosalbez R, Woodard J, Broeker B, Warshaw B. Metabolic complications of the use of stomach for urinary reconstruction. J Urol. 1993;150:710–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gundeti MS, Kojima Y, Haga N, Kiriluk K. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic reconstructive surgery in the lower urinary tract. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14:333–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurocak S, Nuininga J, Ure I, De Gier RP, Tan MO, Feitz W. Bladder augmentation: review of the literature and recent advances. Indian J Urol. 2007a;23(4):452–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gurocak S, de Gier RP, Feitz W. Bladder augmentation without the integration of intact bowel segments: critical review and future perspectives. J Urol. 2007b;177:839–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez A, McLorie G, Gliday D, et al. Long-term evaluation of metabolic profile and bone mineral density after ileocystoplasty in children. J Urol. 2003;170:1639–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hensle TW, Bingham J, Lam J, Shabgish A. Preventing reservoir calculi after augmentation cystoplasty and continent urinary diversion: the influence of an irrigation protocol. BJU Int. 2004;93:585–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi TT, Granberg CF, Fox JA, Husmann DA. Augmentation cystoplasty and risk of neoplasia: fact, fiction and controversy. J Urol. 2010;184:2492–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock RJ, Dufi PG, Malone PS. Ureterocystoplasty: the “bladder” augmentation of choice. Br J Urol. 1994;73:575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horst M, Eberli D, Gobet R, Salemi S. Tissue engineering in Pediatric bladder reconstruction-the road to success. Front Pediatr. 2019;29(7):91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husmann DA, Snodgrass WT, Koyle MA, Furness PD 3rd, Kropp BP, Cheng EY, Kaplan WE, Kramer SA. Ureterocystoplasty: indications for a successful augmentation. J Urol. 2004;171(1):376–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johal NS, Hamid R, Aslam Z, Carr B, Cuckow PM, Duffy PG. Ureterocystoplasty: long-term functional results. J Urol. 2008;179:2373–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinahan TJ, Khoury AE, McLorie GA, Churchill BM. Omeprazole in postgastrocystoplasty metabolic alkalosis and aciduria. J Urol. 1992;147(2):435–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzrock E, Baskin L, Kogan B. Gastrocystoplasty: is there a consensus? World J Urol. 1998a;16:242–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzrock E, Baskin L, Kogan B. Gastrocystoplasty: long-term followup. J Urol. 1998b;160:2182–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landau EH, Jayanthi VK, Khoury AE, et al. Bladder augmentation: ureterocystoplasty versus ileocystoplasty. J Urol. 1994;152:716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lendvay TS, Cowan CA, Mitchell MM, Joyner BD, Grady RW. Augmentation cystoplasty rates at children’s hospitals in the United States: a pediatric health information system database study. J Urol. 2006;176:1716–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SV, Araújo LA, Vilar FO. Nonsecretory intestinocystoplasty: a 10-year experience. J Urol. 2004;171:2636–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeily AE, Afshar K, Coleman GU, Johnson HW. Autoaugmentation by detrusor myotomy: its lack of effectiveness in the management of congenital neuropathic bladder. J Urol. 2003;170(4 Pt 2):1643–6. discussion 1646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marte A, Di Meglio D, Cotrufo AM, Di Iorio G, De Pasquale M, Vessella A. A long-term follow-up of autoaugmentation in myelodysplastic children. BJU Int. 2002;89(9):928–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDougal WS. Metabolic complications of urinary intestinal diversion. J Urol. 1992;147:1199–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe P, Casale A, Kaefer M, et al. Spontaneous bladder perforations: a report of 500 augmentations in children and analysis of risk. J Urol. 2006;175:1466–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mingin G, Nguyen H, Mathias R, et al. Growth and metabolic consequences of bladder augmentation in children with myelomeningocele and bladder exstrophy. Pediatrics. 2002;110:1193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrofanoff P. Cystostomie continente trans-appendiculaire dans le traitement des vessies neurologiques. Chir Pediatr. 1980;21:297–305.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal S, Srinivasan A. Robotics in pediatric urology: evolution and the future. Urol Clin North Am. 2021;48(1):113–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy AR, Noble JG. Bladder augmentation and substitution cystoplasty. In: Frank JD, Gearhart JP, Snyder III HM, editors. Operative pediatric urology. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy AR, Stephenson TP. “Clam” ileocystoplasty for the treatment of refractory urge incontinence. Br J Urol. 1985;57:641–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • N’Dow J, Robson CN, Matthews JN, et al. Reducing mucus production after urinary reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial. J Urol. 2001;165(5):1433–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nahas WC, Lucon M, Mazzucchi E, Antonopoulos IM, Piovesan AC, Neto ED, Ianhez LE, Arap S. Clinical and urodynamic evaluation after ureterocystoplasty and kidney transplantation. J Urol. 2004;171(4):1428–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nurse DE, Mundy AR. Metabolic complications after cystoplasty. Br J Urol. 1985;63:165–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perovic SV, Vukadinovic VM, Djordjevic ML. Augmentation ureterocystoplasty could be performed more frequently. J Urol. 2000;164(3 Pt 2):924–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plaire C, Snodgrass W, Grady R, Mitchell M. Long-term followup of the hematuria-dysuria syndrome. J Urol. 2000;164:921–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radomski SB, Herschorn S, Stone AR. Urodynamic comparison of ileum vs. sigmoid in augmentation cystoplasty for neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14:231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riccabona M, Koen M, Schindler M, Goedele B, Pycha A, Lusuardi L. Botulinum-a toxin injection into the detrusor: a safe alternative in the treatment of children with myelomeningocele with detrusor hyperreflexia. J Urol. 2004;171:845–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlomer BJ, Copp HL. Cumulative incidence of outcomes and urologic procedures after augmentation cystoplasty. J Pediatric Urol 2014; in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlomer BJ, Saperston K, Baskin L. National trends in augmentation cystoplasties in the 2000s and factors associated with patient outcomes. J Urol. 2013;190(4):1352–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J, Demirbilek S, Barthold JS, Gonzαlez R. Surgical complications of bladder augmentation: comparison between various enterocystoplasties in 133 patients. Urology. 2000;55:123–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon CA, Gilbert A, Wacksman J, Lewis AG. Gastrocystoplasty: technical and metabolic characteristics of the most versatile childhood bladder augmentation modality. J Ped Surg. 1995;30:283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeulders N, Woodhouse C. Neoplasia in adult exstrophy patients. BJU Int. 2001;8:623–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soergel TM, Cain MP, Misseri R, et al. Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder following augmentation cystoplasty for the neuropathic bladder. J Urol. 2004;172:1649–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sountoulides P, Laguna MP, de la Rosette JJ. Complications following augmentation cystoplasty; prevention and management. Central European Journal of Urology. 2009:216–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski KM, Misseri R, Whittam B, Lingeman JE, Amstutz S, Ring JD, Kaefer M, Rink RC, Cain MP. Bladder stones after bladder augmentation are not what they seem. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(2):98.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taskinen S, Fagerholm R, Makitie O. Skeletal health after intestinal bladder augmentation: findings in 54 patients. BJU Int. 2007;100:906–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Traxel E, DeFoor W, Minevich E, Reddy P, Alam S, Reeves D, Sheldon C. Low incidence of urinary tract infections following renal transplantation in children with bladder augmentation. J Urol. 2011;186(2):667–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trevisani LFM, Nguyen HT. Current controversies in pediatric urologic robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23:72–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner A, Subramanian R, Thomas DFM, et al. Transplantation of autologous differentiated urothelium in an experimental model of composite cystoplasty. Eur Urol. 2011;59:447–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vates TS, Denes ED, Rabah R, Shapiro E, Suzer O, Freedman AL. González R Methods to enhance in vivo urothelial growth on seromuscular colonic segments in the dog. J Urol. 1997;158(3 Pt 2):1081–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veeratterapillay R, Thorpe AC. Harding C Augmentation cystoplasty: Contemporary indications, techniques and complications. Indian J Urol. 2013;29(4):322–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao F, Zhou L, Xu Z, Xu L, Xu Z, Ping W, Liu J, Zhou C, Wang M, Jia R. Hypoxia-preconditioned adipose-Derived endothelial progenitor cells promote bladder augmentation. Tissue Eng Part A. 2020;26(1–2):78–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Chertin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chertin, B., Koucherov, S., Shenfeld, O.Z. (2022). Augmentation Cystoplasty. In: Puri, P. (eds) Pediatric Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_196-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_196-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38482-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38482-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics