Skip to main content

Contact Dermatitis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Braun-Falco´s Dermatology
  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

Contact dermatitis is a non-infectious inflammatory dermatosis in which pathological changes in the epidermis and upper corium characterize the clinical picture. Etiopathogenetically, it is an irritant or allergic reaction to contact with an exogenous noxious agent, often favored by an individual disposition. Regardless of the etiopathogenesis, similar clinical, histological and molecular changes can be found. Contact dermatitis – including special photoinduced forms – belongs, together with atopic eczema, seborrheic eczema, and nummular dermatitis, to the group of dermatitis or eczema diseases. These are common: about 15–20% of dermatological patients are affected. The nomenclature of dermatitis or eczema diseases is inconsistent, because neither an etiologically nor a pathogenetically reliable classification has been possible so far. The diagnoses dermatitis or eczema are often used synonymously, whereby the term dermatitis has largely established itself in the Anglo-American area. Traditionally, in the German version of this book, diseases with an acute course and rapid regression were referred to as dermatitis and those with a chronic course and a low tendency toward spontaneous regression as eczema, with transitions and intermediate forms occurring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alinaghi F, Bennike NH, Egeberg A et al (2019) Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contact Dermatitis 80:77–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaud A (2020) Mechanism and diagnosis of protein contact dermatitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 20(2):117–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basketter DA, Clapp C, Jefferies D et al (2005) Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds. Contact Dermatitis 53:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonefeld CM, Geisler C, Gimenéz-Arnau E et al (2017) Immunological, chemical and clinical aspects of exposure to mixtures of contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 77:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuer K, Uter W, Geier J (2015) Epidemiological data on airborne contact dermatitis – results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 73:239–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot AC (2018) Patch testing. Test concentrations and vehicles for 4900 chemicals, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKoven JG, Silverberg JI, Warshaw EM et al (2021) North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2017–2018. Dermatitis. 32:111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhingra N, Shemer A, Correa da Rosa JO et al (2014) Molecular profiling of contact dermatitis skin identifies allergen-dependent differences in immune response. J Allergy Clin Immunol 134:362–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diepgen TL, Andersen KE, Chosidow O et al (2015) Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention and treatment of hand eczema. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 13:e1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.12510_1

  • Diepgen TL, Ofenloch RF, Bruze PM et al (2016) Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol 174:319–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esser PR, Martin SF (2017) Pathomechanisms of contact sensitization. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 17:83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler JF, Zirwas MJ (eds) (2018) Fisher’s contact dermatitis, 7th edn. PMPH USA, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin J-P (2006) Contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T et al (2015) European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing – recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis 73:195–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston GA, Exton LS, Mohd Mustapa MF et al (2017) British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of contact dermatitis 2017. Br J Dermatol 176:317–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loman L, Uter W, Armario-Hita JC et al (2021) European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA)†: characteristics of patients patch tested and diagnosed with irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13833

  • Mahler V, Nast A, Bauer A et al (2019a) S3 guidelines: epicutaneous patch testing with contact allergens and drugs – short version, part 1. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 17:1076–1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.13956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler V, Nast A, Bauer A et al (2019b) S3 guidelines: epicutaneous patch testing with contact allergens and drugs – short version, part 2. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 17:1187–1207. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.13971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molin S, Vollmer S, Weiss EH et al (2009) Filaggrin mutations may cause susceptibility to chronic hand eczema characterized by combined allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 161:801–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakada T, Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI (2000) Use tests: ROAT (repeated open application test)/PUT (provocative use test): an overview. Contact Dermatitis 43:1–3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruzicka T, Lynde CW, Jemec GB et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) in patients with severe chronic hand eczema refractory to topical corticosteroids: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Br J Dermatol 158:808–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheman A, Patel KR, Roszko K et al (2020) Relative prevalence of contact allergens in North America in 2018. Dermatitis 31:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert S, Geier J, Skudlik C et al (2020) Relevance of contact sensitizations in occupational dermatitis patients with special focus on patch testing of workplace materials. Contact Dermatitis 83:475–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan MP (2020) Plant associated irritant & allergic contact dermatitis (phytodermatitis). Dermatol Clin 38:389–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HR, Basketter DA, McFadden JP (2002) Irritant dermatitis, irritancy and its role in allergic contact dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol 27:138–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menné T et al (2007) The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population – prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 57:287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uter W, Bauer A, Belloni Fortina A et al (2021) Patch test results with the European baseline series and additions thereof in the ESSCA network, 2015–2018. Contact Dermatitis 84:109–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Uter W, Werfel T, Lepoittevin JP et al (2020) Contact allergy-emerging allergens and public health impact. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:2404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal GA, Rihs HP, Schaffranek A et al (2016) A variant of the CXCL11 gene may influence susceptibility to contact allergy, particularly in polysensitized patients. Contact Dermatitis 75:303–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

First Describer

  • Burkhardt W, Dorta T (1957) Die Alkaliresistenz bei Ekzemen verschiedener Genese und bei Neurodermitits. Dermatologica 114:252–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartmann H, Steigleder GK (1975) Inguinale “Pomaden” – Kruste der Säuglinge. Z Hautkrankh 50:667–669

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet L (1905) In: Grancher J, Comby J, Marfan AB (eds) Traité des maladies de l’enfance. Masson, Paris, p 714

    Google Scholar 

  • Jadassohn J (ed) (1896) Zur Kenntnis der medicamentösen Dermatosen. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, 5. Congress, Wien 1895. Braunmüller, Wien, pp 103–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JC (1975) The angry back syndrome: eczema creates eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1:193–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura T (1977) Toxicoderma caused by shiitake (Lentinus edodes). In Japanese. Jpn J Clin Dermatol 31:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcutt AD, Nelson DM, Czech JA (1991) Axillary granular parakeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 24:541–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schade H, Marchionini A (1928) Zur physikalischen Chemie der Hautoberfläche. Mit 10 Textabbildungen. Arch Dermatol Syphil 154:690–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tappeiner S, Pfleger L (1971) Granuloma gluteale infantum. Hautarzt 22:383–388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Ruëff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ruëff, F. (2021). Contact Dermatitis. In: Plewig, G., French, L., Ruzicka, T., Kaufmann, R., Hertl, M. (eds) Braun-Falco´s Dermatology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58713-3_30-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58713-3_30-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58713-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58713-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics