References
Bennet MN, Hacker PMS (2003) Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Blackwell, Oxford
Boone W, Piccinini G (2016) The cognitive neuroscience revolution. Synthese 193:1509–1534
Brooks JD (2014) “What any Parent Knows” But the Supreme Court Misunderstands: Reassessing Neuroscience’s Role in Diminished Capacity Jurisprudence. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 17(3):442–501
Bunge M (2010) Matter and Mind. A philosophical Inquiry, Springer, Dordrech/London/New York
De Brigard F, Mandelbaum E, Ripley D (2009) Responsibility and the brain sciences. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 12(5):511–524
Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutssson H (2016) Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(28):7900–7905
Farah MJ (2005) Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends Cogn Sci 9(1):1–9
Farahany N (ed) (2009) The impact of behavioral sciences on criminal law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Garland B (ed) (2004) Neuroscience and the law. Brain, mind and the sclaes of justice. Dana Press, New York/Washington
Gazzaniga MS (Chief ed) (2004) The cognitive neuroscience, 3rd edn. MIT, London/Cambridge
Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB, Mangun GR (2008) Cognitive neuroscience: the biology of mind. Norton, New York
Goodenough O, Tucker M (2010) Law and cognitive neuroscience. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 6:61–92
Green J, Cohen J (2004) For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everithing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Science. 359 (1451):1775–1785
Jamie D, Brooks JD (2014) “What any parent knows” but the supreme court misunderstands: reassessing Neuroscience’s role in diminished capacity jurisprudence. New Crim Law Rev Int Interdisciplinary J 17(3):442–501
Jones OD, Schall JD, Shen FX (2014) Law & neuroscience. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, New York
Libet B, Freeman A, Sutherland K (eds) (1999) The volitional brain. Towards a neuroscience of free will. Imprint Academic, Exeter, (2004)
Monteleone GT, Phan KL, Nusbaum HC, Fitzgerald D, Irick JS (2009) Detection of deception using fMRI: better than chance, but well below perfection. Soc Neurosci 4:528–538
Morse SJ (2004) New neuroscience, old problems. In Garland B (ed), Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice, pp157–198. New York, NY, USA: Dana
Morse SJ (2006) Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: a diagnostic note. Ohio State J Crim Law 3:397–412
Morse SJ (2008) Determinism and the death of folk psychology: two challenges to responsibility from neuroscience. Minnesota J Law Sci Technol 9(1):1–36
Morse SJ (2011) Lost in traslation?: An essay on law and neuroscience. In: Freeman M (ed) Law and neuroscience, current legal issues (Vol. 13):529–562
Pardo MS, Patterson D (2013) Minds, brains, and law. The conceptual foundations of law and neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Pardo MS, Patterson D (2014) Morse, mind and mental causation. Crim Law Philos. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9327-0
Raichle ME (2009) A brief history of human brain mapping. Trends Neurosci 32:118–126
Santosousso A (2009) Le neuroscienze e il diritto. Obis, Pavia
Schauer F (2010) Neuroscience, Lie-Detection, and the Law: A Contrarian View. Trends Cogn Sci 14(3)101–03
Shen FX, Gromet DM (2015) Red states, blue states, and brain states issue framing, partisanship, and the future of neurolaw in the United States. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 658(1):86–101
Spranger TM (ed) (2012) International neurolaw. A comparative analysis. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
Taylor JS et al (1991) Neuropsychologists and Neurolawyers. Neuropsychology 5(4):293–305
Taylor JS (2015) Neurolaw and Traumatic Brain Injury: Principles for Trial Lawyers, 84 University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review. 397–399
Tovino SA (2008) The impact of neuroscience on health law. Neuroethics 1:101–117
Uttal W (2008) Neuroscience in the courtroom: what every lawyer should know about the mind and the brain. Lawyers & Judges Publishing, Tucson
Wagner A (2011) Can neuroscience identify lies? In: Gazzaniga M (ed) A judge’s guide to neuroscience: a concise introduction. University of California, Santa Barbara
Weinberg DS et al (2008) The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J Cogn Neurosci 23(3):470–477
Zeki S, Goodenough O (eds) (2006) Law and the brain. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Narváez Mora, M. (2020). Law and Neuroscience. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_88-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_88-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences