Skip to main content

Academic Perception of Governance and Management

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Synonyms

Academic community views; Higher education institution reforms; Steering higher education

Definition

Governance refers to the institutional arrangements higher education institutions (HEIs) apply to “govern” organizational and staff behaviors. Management is associated with the processes and instruments HEIs use to accomplish their objectives in an efficient way. In different HEIs the governance and management models have been changing, and the effects are differently perceived by academics.

Changes in Governance and Management

Changes in HEIs’ governance and management have been identified worldwide both at the system level, usually referred to as changes in the steering model, and at the institutional level (Deem et al. 2007; Krüger et al. 2018).

At the system level, there has been a tendency for the reduction of state direct control over HEIs by giving them more autonomy. This tendency is referred to in the literature as the shift from a “regulatory” to a “facilitatory”...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Aarrevaara, T. 2010. Academic freedom in a changing academic world. European Review 18 (S1): S55–S69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aarrevaara, T., and I.R. Dobson. 2013. Movers and shakers: Do academics control their own work? In The work situation of the academic profession in Europe: Findings of a survey in twelve countries, 159–181. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., and A. Magalhaes. 2002. The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance. In Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance, 1–21. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. 2015. Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of Education Policy 30 (3): 299–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. 2016. Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast. Policy Futures in Education 14 (8): 1046–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. 2018. Changing notions of the governance–creativity nexus. European Review 26: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., J. Enders, B. Lepori, and C. Musselin. 2011. New public management, network governance and the university as a changing professional organization. In The Ashgate research companion to new public management, ed. Tom Christensen and Per Laegreid, 161–176. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmann, S. 2015. Shifting boundaries in universities’ governance models. In The transformation of university institutional and organizational boundaries, 163–184. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T., and S. Diogo. 2018. Does more institutional autonomy equal to more professional autonomy? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 40 (1): 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T., and M. Machado. 2011. Senior management in higher education. In Gender, power and management. A cross cultural analysis of higher education, ed. K. White and B. Bagilhole, 90–109. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T., and R. Santiago. 2010. New public management and ‘middle-management’: How do deans influence institutional policies? In The changing dynamics of higher education middle management: Vol. 28. Higher Education Dynamics, ser. ed. P. Maassen, and J. Müller & vol. ed. L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, R. Santiago, and T. Carvalho, 165–196. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T., and R. Santiago. 2015. Professional autonomy in a comparative perspective: academics, doctors and nurses. In Professionalism, managerialism and reform in higher education and the health services: The European Welfare State and Rise of the Knowledge Society, ed. T. Carvalho and R. Santiago, 30–63. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T., and P. Videira. 2017. Losing autonomy? Restructuring higher education institutions governance and relations between teaching and non-teaching staff. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1401059. Published online nov. 2017.

  • Carvalho, T., G. Marini, and P. Videira. 2016. Is new public management redefining professional boundaries and changing power relations within higher education institutions? Journal of the European Higher Education Area 6 (3): 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, H., J. Enders, and U. Schimank. 2007. On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In New forms of governance in research organizations, 137–152. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., H. Sam, and M. Reed. 2007. Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., H. De Boer, and L. Liudvika. 2008. On striking the right notes: Shifts in governance and the organisational transformation of universities. In From governance to identity: A Festschrift for Mary Henkel, ed. Alberto Amaral, Ivar Bleiklie, and Christine Musselin, 113–129. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., and I. Larsen. 2004. Towards professionalisation? Restructuring of administrative work force in universities. Higher Education 47 (4): 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, E. A., and U. Teichler. 2013. The academic profession in the light of comparative surveys. In The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges, 23–38. Springer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karran, T. 2007. Academic freedom in Europe: A preliminary comparative analysis. Higher Education Policy 20 (3): 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karran, T. 2009. Academic freedom in Europe: Time for a Magna Charta? Higher Education Policy 22 (2): 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G., A. Blümel, and K. Kloke. 2013. The managerial turn in higher education? On the interplay of organizational and occupational change in German academia. Minerva 51 (4): 417–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G., L. Engwall, and E. De Corte. 2018. Introduction to the special issue on ‘university governance and creativity’. European Review 26 (S1): S1–S5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, K., M. Parellada, D. Samoilovich, and A. Sursock. 2018. Governance reforms in European university systems: The case of Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, the Netherlands and Portugal. Vol. 8. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek, M. 2015. The unfading power of collegiality? University governance in Poland in a European comparative and quantitative perspective. International Journal of Educational Development 43: 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. 2013. Redefinition of the relationships between academics and their university. Higher Education 65 (1): 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. 1998. The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education 33 (3): 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G., & van Vught, F. A. (1991). Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. 2014. Management and gender in higher education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R. 2015. The role of internal and external stakeholders. In Higher Education in the BRICS Countries, 43–57. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R., and T. Carvalho. 2012. Managerialism rhetoric’s in Portuguese higher education. Minerva 50 (4): 511–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. 2002. Re–balancing modern concepts of university governance. Higher Education Quarterly 56 (3): 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. 2006. Managing good governance in higher education. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B., and A. Vabø. 2013. Re-inventing shared governance: Implications for organisational culture and institutional leadership. Higher Education Quarterly 67 (3): 256–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U., A. Arimoto, and W. Cummings. 2013. The changing academic profession – Major findings of a comparative survey, The changing academy – The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective. Vol. 1. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. 2008. Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly 62 (4): 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, Celia, and George Gordon. 2010. Diversifying academic and professional identities in higher education: Some management challenges. Tertiary Education and Management 16 (2): 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by National Funds through the FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology under the project UID/CED/00757/2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Carvalho .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Carvalho, T. (2018). Academic Perception of Governance and Management. In: Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_309-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_309-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9553-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9553-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics