Skip to main content

Eliciting Expert Practitioner Knowledge Through Pedagogy and Infographics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences
  • 476 Accesses

Abstract

Qualitative research routinely requires expert practitioner knowledge to be elicited. However, effectively eliciting tacit or implicit knowledge can be problematic. This chapter presents a method in which pedagogy and infographics were combined to elicit the knowledge of expert professionals. During interlocutions, using a progressive series of infographics accompanied by explanations, research participants were quickly taught new topics. Then as the learning occurred, they were asked to reflect on their experience using their new knowledge as a lens. Deployed with Information Systems practitioners, the approach was effective, bringing forth 130,000 words of relevant and advanced discourse. Although details of the Information Systems research are presented in the chapter as an illustration, the chapter’s foci are the method’s underpinning principles and deployment. It is believed that this approach could be easily transferred into a range of qualitative research domains. Given the ambiguity surrounding the term, the concepts of expert and expertise are also discussed along with the challenge of establishing definitions for a given domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aronson E. Dissonance theory: progress and problems. In: Abelson RP, Aronson E, McGuire WJ, Newcomb TM, Rosenberg MJ, Tannenbaum PH, editors. Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook. Chicago: R& McNally; 1968. p. 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson E. Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In: Harmon-Jones E, Mills J, editors. Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. p. 103–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson E, Mills J. The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1959;59:177–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axsom D, Cooper J. Cognitive dissonance and psychotherapy: the role of effort justification in inducing weight loss. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1985;21:149–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie E. The practice of social research. 14th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. The woman who lived. Dr Who. The British Broadcasting Corporation. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvois JL, Joule RV. A radical dissonance theory. London: Taylor and Francis; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm JW. Post decision changes in the desirability of alternatives. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1956;52:384–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper J, Fazio RH. A new look at dissonance theory. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 17. Orlando: Academic; 1984. p. 229–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cote J, Ericsson KA, Law MP. Tracing the development of athletes using retrospective interview methods: a proposed interview and validation procedure for reported information. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2005;17:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draycott S, Dabbs A. Cognitive dissonance: an overview of the literature and its integration into theory and practice of clinical psychology. Br J Clin Psychol. 1998;37:341–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Rev ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:393–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L, Carlsmith JM. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1959;58(2):203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain M. Stages of scale development and validation: the example of the generalized expertise measure (GEM). Columbus: Academy of Human Resource Development; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain M, Ruiz CE. Expertise: myth or reality of a cross-national definition? J Eur Ind Train. 2009;33(7):614–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell M. Outliers: the story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobet F, Campitelli G. The role of domain-specific practice, handedness and starting age in chess. Dev Psychol. 2007;43:159–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Bush RP, Ortinau DJ. Marketing research: a practical approach for the new millennium. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones E, Harmon-Jones C. Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Z Sozialpsychol. 2007;38:7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman RR, Shadbolt NR, Burton AM, Klein G. Eliciting knowledge from experts: a methodological analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1995;62(2):129–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd AL, editor. Knowledge acquisition for expert systems: a practical handbook. New York: Plenum Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard D, Swap WC. Deep smarts: how to cultivate and transfer enduring business wisdom. Boston: Harvard Business School Publications; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. A call for qualitative power analyses: quality & quantity. Int J Met. 2007;41:105–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer; 1986.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai H. A multiplicative power-function model of cognitive dissonance: toward an integrated theory of cognition, emotion, and behavior after Leon Festinger. In: Harmon-Jones E, Mills J, editors. Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. p. 267–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon L, Greenberg J, Brehm JW. Trivialization: the forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68:247–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele CM. The psychology of self-affirmation: sustaining the integrity of the self. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 21. San Diego: Academic; 1988. p. 261–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey: Brooks-Cole; 1979. p. 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund RA, Brehm JW. Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert H. Campbell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Campbell, R.H. (2017). Eliciting Expert Practitioner Knowledge Through Pedagogy and Infographics. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_136-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_136-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics