Abstract
Qualitative research routinely requires expert practitioner knowledge to be elicited. However, effectively eliciting tacit or implicit knowledge can be problematic. This chapter presents a method in which pedagogy and infographics were combined to elicit the knowledge of expert professionals. During interlocutions, using a progressive series of infographics accompanied by explanations, research participants were quickly taught new topics. Then as the learning occurred, they were asked to reflect on their experience using their new knowledge as a lens. Deployed with Information Systems practitioners, the approach was effective, bringing forth 130,000 words of relevant and advanced discourse. Although details of the Information Systems research are presented in the chapter as an illustration, the chapter’s foci are the method’s underpinning principles and deployment. It is believed that this approach could be easily transferred into a range of qualitative research domains. Given the ambiguity surrounding the term, the concepts of expert and expertise are also discussed along with the challenge of establishing definitions for a given domain.
References
Aronson E. Dissonance theory: progress and problems. In: Abelson RP, Aronson E, McGuire WJ, Newcomb TM, Rosenberg MJ, Tannenbaum PH, editors. Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook. Chicago: R& McNally; 1968. p. 5–27.
Aronson E. Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In: Harmon-Jones E, Mills J, editors. Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. p. 103–26.
Aronson E, Mills J. The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1959;59:177–81.
Axsom D, Cooper J. Cognitive dissonance and psychotherapy: the role of effort justification in inducing weight loss. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1985;21:149–60.
Babbie E. The practice of social research. 14th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2016.
BBC. The woman who lived. Dr Who. The British Broadcasting Corporation. 2015.
Beauvois JL, Joule RV. A radical dissonance theory. London: Taylor and Francis; 1996.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
Brehm JW. Post decision changes in the desirability of alternatives. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1956;52:384–9.
Cooper J, Fazio RH. A new look at dissonance theory. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 17. Orlando: Academic; 1984. p. 229–64.
Cote J, Ericsson KA, Law MP. Tracing the development of athletes using retrospective interview methods: a proposed interview and validation procedure for reported information. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2005;17:1–19.
Draycott S, Dabbs A. Cognitive dissonance: an overview of the literature and its integration into theory and practice of clinical psychology. Br J Clin Psychol. 1998;37:341–53.
Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Rev ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1993.
Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:393–4.
Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1957.
Festinger L, Carlsmith JM. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1959;58(2):203–210.
Germain M. Stages of scale development and validation: the example of the generalized expertise measure (GEM). Columbus: Academy of Human Resource Development; 2006.
Germain M, Ruiz CE. Expertise: myth or reality of a cross-national definition? J Eur Ind Train. 2009;33(7):614–34.
Gladwell M. Outliers: the story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company; 2008.
Gobet F, Campitelli G. The role of domain-specific practice, handedness and starting age in chess. Dev Psychol. 2007;43:159–72.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.
Hair JF, Bush RP, Ortinau DJ. Marketing research: a practical approach for the new millennium. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill; 2000.
Harmon-Jones E, Harmon-Jones C. Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Z Sozialpsychol. 2007;38:7–16.
Hoffman RR, Shadbolt NR, Burton AM, Klein G. Eliciting knowledge from experts: a methodological analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1995;62(2):129–58.
Kidd AL, editor. Knowledge acquisition for expert systems: a practical handbook. New York: Plenum Press; 1987.
Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1984.
Leonard D, Swap WC. Deep smarts: how to cultivate and transfer enduring business wisdom. Boston: Harvard Business School Publications; 2005.
Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. A call for qualitative power analyses: quality & quantity. Int J Met. 2007;41:105–21.
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer; 1986.
Sakai H. A multiplicative power-function model of cognitive dissonance: toward an integrated theory of cognition, emotion, and behavior after Leon Festinger. In: Harmon-Jones E, Mills J, editors. Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. p. 267–94.
Simon L, Greenberg J, Brehm JW. Trivialization: the forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68:247–60.
Steele CM. The psychology of self-affirmation: sustaining the integrity of the self. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 21. San Diego: Academic; 1988. p. 261–302.
Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey: Brooks-Cole; 1979. p. 33–47.
Wicklund RA, Brehm JW. Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1976.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Campbell, R.H. (2017). Eliciting Expert Practitioner Knowledge Through Pedagogy and Infographics. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_136-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_136-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences