Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Space, Place, Common Wounds and Boundaries: Insider/Outsider Debates in Research with Black Women and Deaf Women

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

Abstract

The chapter discusses issues of identity in research. It does this by examining the impacts of the identity of the researcher, participants, and the various identity interchanges that take place. This chapter draws on the perspectives and experiences of participants and researcher in a PhD study with five (Six Deaf women were interviewed but one withdrew due to a conflict of interest.) culturally Deaf (white) women and 25 Black (hearing) women discussing their world of work in UK public sector organizations. The theoretical framework of “Africanist Sista-hood in Britain” is that which underpins the positioning of the research and researcher. The chapter provides a reflexive account of the research but in a way that centralizes participant perspectives. Two goals have been achieved; firstly, it adds further contribution to the insider/outsider debate by adding participant perspectives on the issue, and secondly, it demonstrates the ways in which the theoretical framework of “Africanist Sista-hood in Britain” can be used in research not just with Black women but also via collaborative approaches with other social groups. In so doing, the chapter raises a number of important questions: Should researchers seek out participant perspectives on the insider/outsider debates in research? In what ways does the identity interchange between researcher and researched have an impact on the research process? What does Africanist Sista-hood in Britain have to offer to Black women and others carrying out research in the field?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen ML. Studying across difference: race, class and gender in qualitative research. In: Stanfield JH, Dennis RM, editors. Race and ethnicity in research methods. London: SAGE; 1993. p. 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthias F. Nation and post-nation: nationalism, transnationalism and intersections of belonging. In: Collins PH, Solomos J, editors. The Sage handbook of race and ethnic studies. London: SAGE; 2010. p. 221–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atewologun D, Singh V. Challenging ethnic and gender identities: an exploration of UK black professionals’ identity construction. Equal Divers Incl Int J. 2010;29:332–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahan B. On the formation of a visual variety of the human race. In: Bauman H-DL, editor. Open your eyes: deaf studies talking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2008. p. 83–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman H-D. Introduction-listening to deaf studies. In: Bauman H-DL, editor. Open your eyes deaf studies talking. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 2008. p. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman H-DL, Murray JJ. Deaf gain: an introduction. In: Bauman H-DL, Murray JJ, editors. Deaf gain raising the stakes for human diversity. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 2014a. p. xv–xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman H-DL, Murray JJ. Deaf gain raising the stakes for human diversity. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 2014b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball sapmpling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Soc Methods Res. 1981;10(2):141–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brayboy BM. The Indian and the researcher: tales from the field. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2000;13(4):415–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brayboy B, Deyhle D. Insider-outsider: researchers in American Indian communities. Theory Pract. 2000;39(3):163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne K. Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles H. The language of womanism: rethinking difference. In: Safia Mirza H, editor. Black British feminism: a reader. London: Routledge; 1997. p. 278–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins PH. What’s in a name? Womanism, black feminism and beyond. Black Sch. 1996;26:9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins PH. Fighting words: black women & the search for justice. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins PH. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London: Routledge; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins PH, Solomos J. Introduction: situating race and ethnic studies. In: Collins PH, Solomos J, editors. The Sage handbook of race and ethnic studies. London: SAGE; 2010. p. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. London: SAGE; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty M. The foundations of social research. London: SAGE; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis A. Black women and the academy. In: Bobo J, Hudley C, Michel C, editors. The black studies reader. New York: Routledge; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean J. Whose afraid of third wave feminism? Int Femin J Polit. 2009;11(3):334–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, R. C.. Deafnicity: a study of strategic and adaptive responses to audism by members of the Deaf American community of cultrure. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert RC. Towards a theory of deaf ethnos: Deafnicity~ D/deaf. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2010;15(4):317–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faugier J, Sargeant M. Sampling hard to reach populations. J Adv Nurs. 1997;26:790–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett B, Hearn J. Researching others: epistemology, expereience, standpoints and participation. Int J Soc Methodol. 2004;7(3):201–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gair S. Feeling their stories: contemplating empathy, insider/outsider positionings, and enriching qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(1):134–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs G. Analyzing qualitative data. London: SAGE; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson WJ, Brown A. Working with qualitative data. London: Sage; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon G. Towards bicultural competence- beyond black and white. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest G, Macqueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. London: SAGE; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hole R. Narratives of identity a poststructuralist analysis of three deaf women’s life stories. Narrat Inq. 2007a;17:259–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hole R. Working between language and cultures issues of representation, voice and authority intensified. Qual Inq. 2007b;13(5):696–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks b. Feminist theory from the margin to the center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes RA. “Wait a second who are you anyways?”: the insider/outsider debate and American Indian studies. Am Indian Q. 2009;33(4):440–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain D, Turner C. Purple is to lavender: womanism, resistance, and the politic of naming. Negro Educ Rev. 2012;62 & 63(1–4):67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Bailey J. The ties that bind and the shackles that separate: race, gender, class, and color in a research process. J Q Stud Educ. 1999;12(6):659–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd P. Understanding deaf culture: in search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd P. Colonialism and resistance: a brief history of deafhood. In: Bauman H-DL, editor. Open your eyes deaf studies talking. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota; 2008. p. 42–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane H. Ethnicity, ethics and the deaf-world. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005;10(3):291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Focus group methodology: principles and practice. London: Sage; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maylor U. What is the meaning of ‘black’? Researching ‘black’ respondents. Ethnic Racial Stud. 2009;32(2):369–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam SB, Johnson-Bailey J, Ming-Yeh L, Youngwha K, Ntseane G, Muhamad M. Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. Int J Lifelong Educ. 2001;20(5):405–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R. Insider and outsider: a chapter in sociology of knowledge. Am J Sociol. 1972;78(1): 9–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirza HS. Introduction: mapping a genealogy of black British feminism. In: Mirza HS, editor. Black British feminism a reader. London: Routledge; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullings B. Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum. 1999;30:337–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najarian CG. “Between worlds”: deaf women, work, and intersections of gender and ability. London: Routledge; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obasi C. Seeing the deaf in “deafness”. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008;13(4):455–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obasi C. Race and ethnicity in sign language interpreter education, training and practice. Race Ethn Educ. 2013;16(1):103–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obasi C. Negotiating the insider/outsider continua: a black female hearing perspective on research with deaf women and black women. Qual Res. 2014;14(1):61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obasi, C. “The visible invisibles”: exploring the perspectives and experiences of Black women and Deaf women of equality and diversity in the public sector through the prism of Africanist Sista-hood in Britain. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Central Lancashire, England. 2016a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obasi, C. ‘Africanist sista-hood in Britain’: Debating black feminism, womanism and Africana womanism. In: Paper presented at the women of colour conference Black Feiminism, Womanism and the Politics of Women of Colour in Europe. University of Edinburgh 3 Sept 2016. 2016b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochieng B. You know what I mean: the ethical and methodological dilemmas and challenges for black researchers interviewing black families. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(12):1725–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padden C, Humphries T. Inside deaf culture. London: Harvard University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ. 2015. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 4th edn. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds T. Re-thinking a black feminist standpoint. Ethn Racial Stud. 2002;25(4):591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrant-Green L. Black on black: methodological issues for black reserearchers working in minority ethinic communities. Nurse Res. 2002;9(4):30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serry T, Liamputtong P. The in-depth interviewing method in health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer K. Third wave black feminism? Signs J Women Cult Soc. 2002;27(41):1059–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone C, West D. Translation, representation and the deaf ‘voice’. Qual Res. 2012;12(6):645–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgis P. Designing samples. In: Gilbert N, editor. Researching social life. 3rd ed. England: London; 2008. p. 165–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Torino GC, Bucceri JM, Holder AMB, Nadal KL, Esquilin M. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. Am Psychol. 2007;62(4):271–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwankhong D, Liamputtong P. Cultural insiders and research fieldwork: case examples from cross-cultural research with Thai people. Int J Qual Methods. 2015; doi:10.1177/1609406915621404.

  • Temple B, Young A. Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qual Res. 2004;4(2):161–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker A. In search of our mothers’ gardens. New York: Harcourt, Bruce Jovanovich; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis JW. Foundations of qualitative research, interpretive and critical approaches. London: SAGE; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J. Implications for sociolinguistics research among the deaf. Sign Lang Stud. 1972;1: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young L. What is black British feminism? Women Cult Rev. 2000;11:45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young AA Jr. Experiences in ethnographic interviewing about race: the inside and outside of it. In: Bulmer J, Solomos J, editors. Researching race and racism. London: Routledge; 2004. p. 87–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A, Hunt R. Research with deaf people. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A, Temple B. Approaches to social research: the case of deaf studies. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK

    Chijioke Obasi

Authors
  1. Chijioke Obasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chijioke Obasi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Health, Locked Bag 1797, CA.02.35, Western Sydney Univ, School of Science & Health, Locked Bag 1797, CA.02.35, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Obasi, C. (2017). Space, Place, Common Wounds and Boundaries: Insider/Outsider Debates in Research with Black Women and Deaf Women. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_34-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_34-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation