Skip to main content

Autoethnography as a Phenomenological Tool: Connecting the Personal to the Cultural

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

Abstract

Autoethnography retrospectively and selectively writes about experiences that have their basis in, or are made possible by, being part of a culture and/or owning a specific cultural identity. Telling about the experience though must be accompanied by a critical reflection of the lived experience in order to conform to social science publishing conventions (Ellis et al., Forum Qualitat Social Res 12, 2001). In researching my role as the teacher of a group of vocational education professionals from Timor-Leste, I conducted a phenomenological study using autoethnography to portray the existential shifts in my cultural understanding. I used vignettes to firstly place me within the social context, and then to explore my positionality as a researcher, carefully monitoring the impact of my biases, beliefs, and personal experiences on the teacher–student relationship. Initially, I lacked structure in my vignettes, and found it difficult to maintain a format which would guide the reader through my developing cultural awareness. In searching for analytical and representational strategies that would enable me to increase self-reflexivity and honor my commitment to the actual, I used vignettes to describe (show) moments of cultural existential crises, and then explore my experiences by reflecting on the reactions I had, and the actions I subsequently took, in dealing with these crises (telling). My structured vignette analysis framework helped me to reveal layers of awareness that might otherwise remain experienced but concealed, and to take the reader on a collaborative journey of cultural discovery. In this chapter, I present to you my framework as used in a cross-cultural setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander BK. Performance ethnography: the re-enacting and inciting of culture. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. p. 411–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson L. Analytic autoethnography. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2006;35(4):373–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avruch K. Culture and conflict resolution. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2013;15(2):219–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bochner AP. Criteria against ourselves. Qual Inq. 2000;6(2):266–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H. Autoethnography: raising cultural awareness of self and others. In: Walford G, editor. Methodological developments in ethnography 1. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007. p. 207–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK. Analytic autoethnography, or déjà vu all over again. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2006;35(4):419–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dervin B. Given a context by any other name: methodological tools for taming the unruly beast. In: Dervin B, Foreman-Wernet L (with E. Lauterbach), editor. Sense-making methodology reader: selected writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill: Hampton Press; 2003. p. 111–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan M. Autoethnography: critical appreciation of an emerging art. Int J Qual Methods. 2004;3(4):Article 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis C, Bochner AP. Composing ethnography: alternative forms of qualitative writing. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis C, Bochner AP. Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: researcher as subject. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 733–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis C, Adams TE, Bochner AP. Autoethnography: an overview. Forum Qualitat Social Res. 2011;12(1):Art. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen N, Henriksson C, Saevi T. Hermeneutic phenomenology in education. Method and practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett D, Hodkinson P. Can there be criteria for selecting research criteria? A hermeneutical analysis of an inescapable dilemma. Qual Inq. 1999;4:515–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green S. Lessons learned from the college of life; 2013. The Age. Retrieved from http://www.theage.com.au/national/education/lessons-learnt-from-the-college-of-life-20131127-2y9wk.html

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 105–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst WB, editor. Language and ethnic identity. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst WB, Nishida T. Anxiety, uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of communication across relationships and cultures. Int J Intercult Relat. 2001;25(1):55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst WB. Theorizing about intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall ET. The silent language. New York: Doubleday; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton ML, Smith L, Worthington K. Fitting the methodology with the research: an exploration of narrative, self-study and autoethnography. Stud Teach Educ. 2008;4(1):17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockenbury DH, Hockenbury SE. Discovering psychology. New York: Worth Publishers; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. Dimensionalizing cultures: the hofstede model in context. Online Read Psychol Cult. 2011;2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt N. Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: an autoethnographic writing story. Int J Qual Methods. 2003;2(1):Article 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes P, Kerr I. Transference and countertransference between in communication between doctor and patient. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2000;6(1):57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes R. Vignettes. In: Given L, editor. The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008. p. 919–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys M. Getting personal: reflexivity and autoethnographic vignettes. Qual Inq. 2005;11:840–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (trans: Carr D.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1970 [1936].

    Google Scholar 

  • Laverty SM. Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. Int J Qual Methods. 2003;2(3):Art. 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lustig MW, Koester J. Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto D, Leroux JA, Yoo SH. Emotion and intercultural communication. Kwansei Gakuan University J. 2005;99:15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngunjiri FW, Hernandez K-AC, Chang H. Living autoethnography: connecting life and research [editorial]. J Res Pract. 2010;6(1):Art E1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks M. Where does scholarship begin? Address presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, Chicago; 1997 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng K, Nisbett RE. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. Am Psychol. 1999;54(9):741–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickard AJ. Research methods in information. London: Facet; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitard J. Using vignettes within autoethnography to explore layers of cross-cultural awareness as a teacher [40 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitat Social Res. 2016;17(1):Art. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed-Danahay DE. Leaving home: schooling stories and the ethnography of autoethnography in rural France. In: Reed-Danahay, editor. Auto/ethnography: rewriting the self and the social. Oxford: Berg; 1997. p. 123–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson L. New writing practices in qualitative research. Sociol Sport J. 2000;17:5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronai CR. Multiple reflections of child sex abuse: an argument for a layered account. J Contemp Ethnogr. 1995;23(4):395–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell GM, Kelly NH. Research as interacting dialogic processes: implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitat Social Res. 2002;3(3):Art. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes AC. Autoethnography and narratives of self: reflections on criteria in action. Sociol Sport J. 2000;17:21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey H. Culturally speaking: culture, communication and politeness theory. 2nd ed. London: Continuum; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trede F, Higgs J. Framing research questions and writing philosophically in writing qualitative research on practice. In: Higgs J, Horsfall D, Grace S, editors. Writing qualitative research on practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2009. p. 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen M. Phenomenology of practice: meaning giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall S. An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(2):Article 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt D. On becoming a qualitative researcher: the value of reflexivity. Qual Rep. 2007;12(1):82–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayne Pitard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pitard, J. (2017). Autoethnography as a Phenomenological Tool: Connecting the Personal to the Cultural. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_48-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_48-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics