Abstract
Autoethnography retrospectively and selectively writes about experiences that have their basis in, or are made possible by, being part of a culture and/or owning a specific cultural identity. Telling about the experience though must be accompanied by a critical reflection of the lived experience in order to conform to social science publishing conventions (Ellis et al., Forum Qualitat Social Res 12, 2001). In researching my role as the teacher of a group of vocational education professionals from Timor-Leste, I conducted a phenomenological study using autoethnography to portray the existential shifts in my cultural understanding. I used vignettes to firstly place me within the social context, and then to explore my positionality as a researcher, carefully monitoring the impact of my biases, beliefs, and personal experiences on the teacher–student relationship. Initially, I lacked structure in my vignettes, and found it difficult to maintain a format which would guide the reader through my developing cultural awareness. In searching for analytical and representational strategies that would enable me to increase self-reflexivity and honor my commitment to the actual, I used vignettes to describe (show) moments of cultural existential crises, and then explore my experiences by reflecting on the reactions I had, and the actions I subsequently took, in dealing with these crises (telling). My structured vignette analysis framework helped me to reveal layers of awareness that might otherwise remain experienced but concealed, and to take the reader on a collaborative journey of cultural discovery. In this chapter, I present to you my framework as used in a cross-cultural setting.
References
Alexander BK. Performance ethnography: the re-enacting and inciting of culture. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. p. 411–41.
Anderson L. Analytic autoethnography. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2006;35(4):373–95.
Avruch K. Culture and conflict resolution. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace; 2004.
Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2013;15(2):219–34.
Bochner AP. Criteria against ourselves. Qual Inq. 2000;6(2):266–72.
Chang H. Autoethnography: raising cultural awareness of self and others. In: Walford G, editor. Methodological developments in ethnography 1. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007. p. 207–21.
Denzin NK. Analytic autoethnography, or déjà vu all over again. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2006;35(4):419–28.
Dervin B. Given a context by any other name: methodological tools for taming the unruly beast. In: Dervin B, Foreman-Wernet L (with E. Lauterbach), editor. Sense-making methodology reader: selected writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill: Hampton Press; 2003. p. 111–32.
Duncan M. Autoethnography: critical appreciation of an emerging art. Int J Qual Methods. 2004;3(4):Article 3.
Ellis C, Bochner AP. Composing ethnography: alternative forms of qualitative writing. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 1996.
Ellis C, Bochner AP. Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: researcher as subject. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 733–68.
Ellis C, Adams TE, Bochner AP. Autoethnography: an overview. Forum Qualitat Social Res. 2011;12(1):Art. 10.
Friesen N, Henriksson C, Saevi T. Hermeneutic phenomenology in education. Method and practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2012.
Garrett D, Hodkinson P. Can there be criteria for selecting research criteria? A hermeneutical analysis of an inescapable dilemma. Qual Inq. 1999;4:515–39.
Green S. Lessons learned from the college of life; 2013. The Age. Retrieved from http://www.theage.com.au/national/education/lessons-learnt-from-the-college-of-life-20131127-2y9wk.html
Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 105–17.
Gudykunst WB, editor. Language and ethnic identity. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 1988.
Gudykunst WB, Nishida T. Anxiety, uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of communication across relationships and cultures. Int J Intercult Relat. 2001;25(1):55–71.
Gudykunst WB. Theorizing about intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 2005.
Hall ET. The silent language. New York: Doubleday; 1959.
Hamilton ML, Smith L, Worthington K. Fitting the methodology with the research: an exploration of narrative, self-study and autoethnography. Stud Teach Educ. 2008;4(1):17–28.
Hockenbury DH, Hockenbury SE. Discovering psychology. New York: Worth Publishers; 2011.
Hofstede G. Dimensionalizing cultures: the hofstede model in context. Online Read Psychol Cult. 2011;2(1).
Holt N. Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: an autoethnographic writing story. Int J Qual Methods. 2003;2(1):Article 2.
Hughes P, Kerr I. Transference and countertransference between in communication between doctor and patient. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2000;6(1):57–64.
Hughes R. Vignettes. In: Given L, editor. The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008. p. 919–21.
Humphreys M. Getting personal: reflexivity and autoethnographic vignettes. Qual Inq. 2005;11:840–60.
Husserl E. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (trans: Carr D.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1970 [1936].
Laverty SM. Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. Int J Qual Methods. 2003;2(3):Art. 3.
Lustig MW, Koester J. Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon; 2006.
Matsumoto D, Leroux JA, Yoo SH. Emotion and intercultural communication. Kwansei Gakuan University J. 2005;99:15–38.
Ngunjiri FW, Hernandez K-AC, Chang H. Living autoethnography: connecting life and research [editorial]. J Res Pract. 2010;6(1):Art E1.
Parks M. Where does scholarship begin? Address presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, Chicago; 1997 .
Peng K, Nisbett RE. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. Am Psychol. 1999;54(9):741–54.
Pickard AJ. Research methods in information. London: Facet; 2007.
Pitard J. Using vignettes within autoethnography to explore layers of cross-cultural awareness as a teacher [40 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitat Social Res. 2016;17(1):Art. 11.
Reed-Danahay DE. Leaving home: schooling stories and the ethnography of autoethnography in rural France. In: Reed-Danahay, editor. Auto/ethnography: rewriting the self and the social. Oxford: Berg; 1997. p. 123–44.
Richardson L. New writing practices in qualitative research. Sociol Sport J. 2000;17:5–20.
Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
Ronai CR. Multiple reflections of child sex abuse: an argument for a layered account. J Contemp Ethnogr. 1995;23(4):395–426.
Russell GM, Kelly NH. Research as interacting dialogic processes: implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitat Social Res. 2002;3(3):Art. 18.
Sparkes AC. Autoethnography and narratives of self: reflections on criteria in action. Sociol Sport J. 2000;17:21–43.
Spencer-Oatey H. Culturally speaking: culture, communication and politeness theory. 2nd ed. London: Continuum; 2008.
Trede F, Higgs J. Framing research questions and writing philosophically in writing qualitative research on practice. In: Higgs J, Horsfall D, Grace S, editors. Writing qualitative research on practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2009. p. 13–26.
van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1990.
van Manen M. Phenomenology of practice: meaning giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2014.
Wall S. An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(2):Article 9.
Watt D. On becoming a qualitative researcher: the value of reflexivity. Qual Rep. 2007;12(1):82–101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pitard, J. (2017). Autoethnography as a Phenomenological Tool: Connecting the Personal to the Cultural. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_48-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_48-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences