Abstract
Hermeneutics has long been used with huge gains in various fields of research as the underpinning paradigm. In particular, Heidegger’s interpretive framework of being and becoming has influenced many a research undertaking owing to its resilience and flexibility in bringing to life the lived experience. However, despite its versatility, hermeneutics is largely overlooked in current research contexts because of its density of ideas and verbosity. Hence, the aim of this chapter is to unpack the main tenets of Heideggerian phenomenology as embodied in Being and Time and make a pioneering effort to underline the implications of such a framework for cross-disciplinary research. Heidegger’s facticity of being is first explicated followed by an overview of the thereness of being which comprises being in the world of care spatially and temporally. In this existential state, verstehen or understanding is an event that occurs when the three fore-closures of the hermeneutic circle – fore-having, fore-sight, and fore-conception, work collaboratively to foreground meaning. Interestingly, in this ontological circle, it is language that serves as the medium of understanding. The benefits this ontic approach offers researchers, notably, those interested in cross-disciplinary research, are manifold. The main elements of hermeneutics provide a unique, flexible framework to examine a range of complexities and open up rich avenues for a multidimensional enquiry. Hermeneutics is indeed a boon for cross-disciplinary research. Harnessing the rich potential of hermeneutics would credit researchers with a sound intellectual base, advance cross-disciplinary research, and optimize the quality of research outcomes.
References
Aagaard-Hansen J. The challenges of cross disciplinary research. Soc Epistemol: J Knowl Cult Policy. 2007;21(4):425–38.
Aho K. Medicalising mental health: a phenomenological alternative. J Med Humanit. 2008;29(4):243–59.
Benner P. From Novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley Publication; 1984.
Bonevac D. Heidegger’s map. Acad Quest. 2014;27:165–84.
Cammell P. Rationality and existence: hermeneutic and deconstructive approaches emerging from Heidegger’s philosophy. Humanist Psychol. 2015;43:235–49.
Campbell S. Early Heidegger’s philosophy of life: facticity, being and language. 2012. Retrieved from http://www.site.ebrary.com. Accessed 1 Sept 2017.
Clark T. Martin Heidegger. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2011.
Dall’Alba G. Learning professional ways of being: ambiguities of becoming. Educ Philos Theory. 2009;41(1):34–45.
DePoy E. Introduction to research: understanding and applying multiple strategies. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2016.
Donnelly J. Instrumentality, hermeneutics and the place of science in the school curriculum. Sci Educ. 2002;11(2):135–53.
Dowling M. Hermeneutics: an exploration. Nurs Res. 2004;11(4):30–9.
Gibbons A. The incoherence of curriculum: questions concerning early childhood teacher educators. Australas J Early Childhood. 2011;36(1):9–15.
Giles D, Smythe E, Spence D. Exploring relationships in education: a phenomenological enquiry. Aust J Adult Learn. 2012;52(2):214–36.
Greatrex-White S. A way of seeing study abroad: narratives from nurse education. Learn Health Soc Care. 2007;6(3):134–44.
Greaves T. Dasein: a living question. In: Starting with Heidegger. 2010. Retrieved from http://www.site.ebrary.com. Accessed 25 Sept 2017.
Guenther J. The lived experience of ovarian cancer: a phenomenological approach. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2012;24(10):595–603.
Heidegger M. Being and time (translated by Macquarie J, Robinson E). London: SCM Press; 1962.
Heidegger M. Martin Heidegger: being and time (translated by Macquarie J, Robinson E). Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1978.
Horrocks S. Scholarship, teaching and calculative thinking: a critique of the audit culture in UK nurse education. Nurse Educ Today. 2006;26(1):4–10.
Huang YP, Chen SL, Tsai SW. Father’s experiences of involvement in the daily care of their child with developmental disability in a Chinese context. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21:3287–96.
Ironside P. New pedagogies for teaching thinking: the lived experiences of students and teachers enacting narrative pedagogy. J Nurs Educ. 2003;42(11):509–16.
Joensuu K. Care for the other’s selfhood: a view on child care and education through Heidegger’s analytic of Dasein. Early Child Dev Care. 2012;182(3):44–434.
Johnson ME. Heidegger and meaning: implications for phenomenological research. Nurs Philos. 2000;1:134–46.
Johnson P, St. John W, Moyle W. Long term mechanical ventilation in a critical care unit: existing in an everyday world. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(5):551–8.
Jones A. Philosophical and socio-cognitive foundations for teaching in higher education through collaborative approaches to student learning. Educ Philos Theory. 2011;43(9):997–1011.
Kakkori L. Education and the concept of time. Educ Philos Theory. 2013;45(5):571–83.
Karniouchina E, Victorino L, Verma R. Product and service innovation: ideas for future cross-disciplinary research. J Prod Innov Manag. 2006;23:56–280.
Kayali T, Furhan I. Depression as unhomelike being-in-the-world? Phenomenology’s challenge to our understanding of illness. Med Healthc Philos. 2013;16(1):31–9.
Koch T. Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trial. J Adv Nurs. 1994;19:996–1002.
Larivee A. Being and time and the ancient philosophical tradition of care for the self: a tense or harmonious relationship? Philos Pap. 2014;43(1):123–44.
Little C. Technological competence as a structure of learning in critical care. J Clin Nurs. 2000;9(3):391–9.
McConnell-Henry T, Chapman Y, Francis K. Unpacking Hedeggerian phenomenology. Online J Nurs Res. 2009;9(1):1–12.
Neuman WL. Social research methods. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson Education; 2006.
Olausson B, Utbult Y, Hansson S, Krantz M, Brydolf M, Lindstrom B, Holmgren D. Transplanted children’s experiences of daily living: children’s narratives about their lives following transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2006;10(5):575–85.
Orr J. Being and timelessness: Edith Stein’s critique of Heideggerian temporality. Mod Theol. 2014;30(1):115–30.
Ortiz NR. Hermeneutics and nursing research: history, processes, and exemplar. Online J Nurs Res. 2009;9(1):1–7.
Paley J. Heidegger, lived experience and method. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(7):1520–31.
Peters MA. Editorial: Heidegger, phenomenology, education. Educ Philos Theory. 2009;41(1):1–6.
Powell J. Studies in continental thought: Heidegger and language. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.eblib.com. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
Ream T, Ream C. From low lying roofs to towering spires: toward a Heideggerian understanding of learning environments. Educ Philos Theory. 2005;37(4):586–7.
Riley D. Heidegger teaching: an analysis and interpretation of pedagogy. Educ Philos Theory. 2011;43(8):797–815.
Risser R. Hermeneutics and the voice of the other: re-reading Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1997.
Schmitt R. Can Heidegger be understood? Inquiry: an interdisciplinary. J Philos. 2008;10:1–4.
Slattery, Krasny K, O’Malley. Hermeneutics, aesthetics, and the quest for answerability: a dialogic possibility for reconceptualising the interpretive process in curriculum studies. J Curric Stud. 2007;39(5):537–58.
Smith C. Martin Heidegger and the dialogue with being. Cent States Speech J. 2009;36(4):256–69.
Sorlie V, Jansson L, Norberg A. The meaning of being in ethically difficult situations in paediatric care as narrated by female registered nurses. Scand J Caring Sci. 2003;17(3):285–92.
Spratling R. The experiences of medically fragile adolescents who require respiratory assistance. J Adv Nurs. 2013;68(12):2740–9.
Steiner G. Heidegger. Glasgow: William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd.; 1978.
Tomkins L, Eatough V. Meanings and manifestations of care: a celebration of hermeneutic multiplicity in Heidegger. Humanist Psychol. 2013;41:4–24.
Totka J. Exploring the boundaries of pediatric practice: nurse stories related to relationships. Pediatr Nurs. 1996;22(3):191–3.
Vu T, Dall’Alba G. Exploring an authentic approach to assessment for enhancing student learning. Paper presented at the AARE Conference, Brisbane. 2008.
Walters A. Technology and the lifeworld of critical care nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1995;22(2):338–46.
Warnke G. The hermeneutic circle versus dialogue. Rev Metaphys. 2011;65(1):91–112.
Wilson A. Application of Heideggerian phenomenology to mentorship of nursing students. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(12):2910–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
D’Souza, S. (2018). Hermeneutics: A Boon for Cross-Disciplinary Research. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_63-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_63-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences