Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Case Study Research

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

  • 822 Accesses

Abstract

Case study research has been extensively used in numerous disciplines as a way to test and develop theory, add to humanistic understanding and existing experiences, and uncover the intricacies of complex social phenomena. Its usefulness as an exploratory tool makes it a popular methodology to employ among social scientists. This usefulness, however, has, at times, been overshadowed by several misunderstandings of and oversimplifications about the nature of case study research. Although these misunderstandings, such as the inability to confidently make scientific generalizations on the basis of a single case, may be presented as limitations, they should not detract social scientists from using case study research for certain critical research tasks. Used in such a way, case study research holds up considerably well to many other social science methodologies and can certainly contribute to the development of knowledge. This chapter examines case study research with emphasis on its “generality,” notably what Stake proposed as “naturalistic generalization,” a proxy process that enables the generalization of findings from a single case. It will interrogate the misunderstanding that case study research cannot effectively contribute to scientific development, by focusing on single-case designs. Single-case designs attempt to understand one particular case in-depth and allow for a richer understanding of the issue under investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison GT. Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1969;63(3):689–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett L, Vavrus F. Rethinking case study research. New York: Routledge; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donmoyer R. Generalizability and the single-case study. In: Gomm R, Hammersley M, Foster P, editors. Case study method- key issues, key texts. London: Sage; 2000. p. 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff PA. Case study research on language learning and use. Ann Rev Appl Linguist. 2014;34:233–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein H. Case study in theory and political science. In: Greenstein FJ, Polsby NW, editors. Handbook of political science. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975. p. 79–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM. Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev. 1989;14(4):532–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman C, Gerring J, Mahoney J. Case study research: putting the quant into the qual. Sociol Methods Res. 2016;45(3):375–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exworthy E, Peckham S. Case studies in health policy: an introduction. In: Exworthy E, Peckham S, Powell M, Hann A, editors. Shaping health policy: case study methods and analysis. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2012. p. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvberg B. Five misunderstanding about case-study research. Qual Inq. 2006;12(2):219–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvberg B. Case study. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011. p. 301–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring J. The conundrum of the case study. In: Gerring J, editor. Case study research: principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 1–13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring J. Case study research- principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel J. Case study methods. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton D. A science of the singular. Urbana: CIRCE, University of Illinois; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton D. Some more on fieldwork, natural languages and naturalistic generalisation (mimeo), discussion paper. University of Glasgow; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellström T. Transferability and naturalistic generalization: new generalizability concepts for social science or old wine in new bottles. Qual Quant. 2008;42:321–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. The only generalization is: there is no generalization’. In: Gomm R, Hammersley M, Foster P, editors. Case study method key issues, key texts. London: Sage; 2000. p. 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald B, Walker R. Case study and the social philosophy of educational research. Camb J Educ. 1975;5:2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinetto M. Case studies of the health policy process: a methodological introduction. In: Exworthy E, Peckham S, Powell M, Hann A, editors. Shaping health policy: case study methods and analysis. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2012. p. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren G. The wild food challenge: a case study of a self-initiated experiential education project. Graham: Prescot College, Proquest; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melrose S. Naturalistic generalization. In: Mills AJ, Durepos G, Wiebe E, editors. Encyclopedia of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam SB. Case study research in education- a qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills AJ, Durepos G, Wiebe E, editors. Encyclopedia of case study research, vol. 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton E, Appelbaum SH. The case for case studies in management research. Manag Res News. 2003;26(5):60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M. Personal knowledge. New York: Harper and Row; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC. “Casing” and the process of social inquiry. In: Ragin CC, Becker HS, editors. What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. p. 217–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt TA, Gates EF. Case study methodology. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018. p. 341–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seawright J, Gerring J. Case selection techniques in case study research- a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Polit Res Q. 2008;61(2):294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons H. The paradox of case study. Camb J Educ. 1986;26(2):225–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons H. Preface. In: Russell J, Greenhalgh T, Kushner S, editors. Case study evaluation: past, present and future challenges. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2015. p. ix–xvi.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simons H, Kushner S, Jones K, James D. From evidence-based practice to practice-based evidence: the idea of situated generalisation. Res Pap Educ. 2003;18(4):347–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skar L, Prellwitz M. Participation in play activities: a single-case study focusing on a child with obesity experiences. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008;22(2):211–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake ER. The case study method in social inquiry. Educ Res. 1978;7(2):5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake ER. Generalizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Association, Boston. 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake ER. The art of case study research. London: Sage; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake RE. The case study method in social inquiry. In: Gomm R, Hammersley M, Foster P, editors. Case study method key issues, key texts. London: Sage; 2000. p. 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake RE. Qualitative case studies. In: Denzin NY, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. p. 443–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake RE. Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake ER, Trumbull D. Naturalistic generalizations. Rev J Philos Soc Sci. 1982;7(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker R. Evaluating and rethinking the case study. Sociol Rev. 1991;39(1):88–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanborn PG. Case study research- what, why and how? London: Sage; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G. A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qual Inq. 2011;17(6):511–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte WF. Street corner society: the social structure of an Italian slum (original work published in 1943). 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh LS, Hedgespeth J. A multiple case study comparison of normative private preparatory school and substance abusing/mood disordered adolescents and their families. Adolescence. 1995;118:413–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK. Case study research: designs and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK. Case study research: designs and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Milperra, NSW, Australia

    Pota Forrest-Lawrence

Authors
  1. Pota Forrest-Lawrence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pota Forrest-Lawrence .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Health, Locked Bag 1797, CA.02.35, Western Sydney Univ, School of Science & Health, Locked Bag 1797, CA.02.35, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Forrest-Lawrence, P. (2018). Case Study Research. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_67-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_67-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation