Introduction
A thoughtful and serious consideration of student voice can yield substantial benefits for schools, teachers, and students. Linked to the idea of schools as democratic communities, such consideration fosters students’ feelings of inclusion, validation, and agency. In thinking about these benefits, however, it is important to examine the location of student voice within the parameters of audit currently shaping the culture of schools. Within these parameters, the external accountabilities of standardized tests have become the measure of school improvement and excellence. Such accountabilities have narrowed school priorities to raising test attainment and reduced both schools and students to “auditable commodities” – their worth and value measured and assessed against quantifiable standards and targets. This is a climate of competitive individualism where students are living an existence of calculation, constantly measuring themselves against a narrow vision of ideal...
References
Apple, M. (2010). Global crises, social justice, and education. New York: Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Davies, B. (2005). The (im)possibility of intellectual work in neoliberal regimes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(1), 1–14.
Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311.
Keddie, A. (2014). Student voice and teacher accountability: Possibilities and problematics. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 23(2), 225–244.
Keddie, A. (2016). Children of the market: Performativity, neoliberal responsibilisation and the construction of student identities. Oxford Review of Education, 42(1), 108–122.
Roberts, A., & Nash, J. (2009). Enabling students to participate in school improvement through a students as researchers Programme. Improving Schools, 12(2), 174–187.
Rudduck, J. (2007). Student voice, student engagement and school reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587–610). Dordrecht: Springer.
Rudduck, J., & Fielding, M. (2006). Student voice and the perils of popularity. Educational Review, 58(2), 219–231.
Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). What is the ‘dialogical method’ of teaching? Journal of Education, 169(3), 11–31.
Wilkins, A. (2012). The spectre of neoliberalism: Pedagogy, gender and the construction of learner identities. Critical Studies in Education, 53, 197–210.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Keddie, A. (2019). Student Voice, Schooling, and the Audit Culture. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_31-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_31-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1179-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1179-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education