Abstract
Differentiated instruction has been a framework of effective teaching and a main indicator of professional standards of gifted teachers in Taiwan. However, practically, there are significant disparities between the theoretical expectations and practical implementations regarding curriculum modification, teaching strategies, and demanded resources. Before the advocacy of the concept of differentiated instruction, attuned pedagogy was a very similar idea to differentiated instruction and has been a common language used to describe the goal of effective teaching in Taiwan and in the Chinese culture. Based on the perspective of the culture-sensitive research paradigm, the purpose of this chapter is to delineate the ideal of attuned pedagogy and suggest attuned pedagogy as the artistry of differentiated instruction for cultivating giftedness when we face the challenges of intellectual diversity. This chapter will firstly review the challenges of differentiated instruction in Taiwan. Then based on the studies of master gifted teachers in elementary schools, three essential principles of attuned pedagogy are proposed: uniqueness not individuality, intimate relationships, and matching the curve of variation. The four recurrent themes regarding the praxis of attuned pedagogy include inspiring volition to discipline the minds, following student’s natural tendency to find the sweet spot, moderating in-between to trigger poetntial, and leaving space to attune personalized connections. Accordingly, the goal of gifted education is to transform giftedness in context. With the long-term purpose of gifted education being to build the student’s learning potential and guide harmony in diversification, the task of gifted educators has to be rooted in wisdom based on professional knowledge and judgement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Armstrong, J. (2000). Move closer: An intimate philosophy of art. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
Bacon, F. (2019). Novum Organum. New York, NY: P. F. Collier & Son. (Original work published 1902).
Bruner, J. (1962). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chen, W.-R. (2014). Cultivating a Jian Zi: Exploring an art teacher’s responsive pedagogy for the development of art talent in Taiwan. Gifted Education International, 33(1), 18–33.
Chen, J., Chen, C., & Pan, Y. (2008). A study on differentiated instruction in Taipei elementary gifted education. Journal of Gifted Education, 8(2), 1–22.
Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2014). Paradigms of gifted education: A guide to theory-based, practice-focused research. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Dewey, J. (1929). The sources of a science of education. New York, NY: Liveright. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/sourcesofascienc009452mbp/page/n5
Dewey, J., & Dewey, E. (1973). Schools for tomorrow. New York, NY: Dutton.
Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111–127.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gadamer, H. (1979). Practical philosophy as a model of the human sciences. Research in Phenomenology, 9, 74–85.
Gagné, F. (2009). Debating giftedness: Pronat vs. Antinat. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 155–198). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Gagné, F. (2013). The DMGT: Changes within, beneath, and beyond. Talent Development and Excellence, 5, 5–19.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Hart, L. (2010). On the wings of self-esteem: A companion for personal transformation. Oakland, CA: Uplift.
Haste, H. (2008). Constructing competence: Discourse, identity, and culture. In I. Plath, I. Graudenz, & H. Breit (Eds.), Kultur-Handlung-Demokratie (pp. 109–134). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
Hertzog, N. B. (2005). Equity and access: Creating general education classrooms responsive to potential giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(2), 213–257.
Huang, R. (2014). A comparative study on the differentiated curriculum of gifted education between Taiwan and China (Unpublished master thesis). National University of Taipei, Taiwan.
Jackson, P. W. (1996). Life in classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
James, W. (1899/2008). Talks to teachers on psychology and to students on some of life’s ideals. New York, NY: Holt. (Original work published 1899).
Jullien, F. (2004). A treatise on efficacy: Between Western and Chinese thinking (J. Lloyd, Trans.). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii. (Original work published 1996).
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture & Activity, 3(3), 149–164.
Legge, J. (1893). The Chinese classics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://ctext.org/zh?en=on
Lu, C. H. (2015a). Individuating: Teachers’ praxis of connoisseurship of gifted children’s potential (National Science Council Report, No. NSC 101–2410-H-152-014-MY2). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taipei University of Education, Department of Special Education.
Lu, C. H. (2015b). The Chinese way of goodness. In S. Hsu & Y.-Y. Wu (Eds.), Education as cultivation in Chinese culture (pp. 45–62). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
Maker, J. C. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
Martin, A. (2011). Personal best approaches to academic development: Implications for motivation and assessment. Educational Practice and Theory, 33(1), 93–99.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
May, R. (1982). The courage to create. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Morton, B. (2011, August 29). Falser words were never spoken. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/30/opinion/falser-words-were-never-spoken.html
Moustakas, C. E. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Persson, R. S. (2012). Cultural variation and dominance in a globalized knowledge-economy: Towards a culture-sensitive research paradigm in the science of giftedness. Gifted and Talented International, 27(1), 15–48.
Polanyi, M. (1979). Personal knowledge towards a post-critical philosophy. London, UK: Routledge.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.
Rubin, L. (1989). The thinking teacher: Cultivating pedagogical intelligence. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 31–34.
Sato, M. (2008). Philosophy on the restoration of schools in Japan: The vision, principles and activity system of the learning community. E-Journal of All India Association for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://www.aiaer.net/ejournal/vol20208/3.htm
Scheffler, I. (1985). Of human potential: An essay in the philosophy of education. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Schwab, J. J. (1983). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(3), 239–265.
Scott, J. (Ed.). (2009). Bengali flower: 50 selected poems from India and Bangladesh by Rabindranath Tagore. Newark, NJ: Unique Art & Gifts Publishing.
Smith, S. R. (2009a). A dynamic ecological framework for differentiating the primary curriculum. Gifted and Talented International, 24(2), 9–20.
Smith, S. R. (2009b). Differentiated education for eco-engagement: Supporting teachers and challenging gifted students through community service projects. In D. Wood (Ed.), The gifted challenge: Challenging the gifted (pp. 79–89). Mudgee, NSW: NSW Association of Gifted and Talented Children: Lynx Printing.
Smith, S. (2015a). A dynamic differentiation framework for talent enhancement: Findings from syntheses and teacher perceptions. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 24, 59–72.
Smith, S. R. (2015b). Differentiating teaching for sustainability for diverse student learning. In N. Taylor, F. Quinn, & C. Eames (Eds.), Educating for sustainability in primary schools: Teaching for the future (pp. 65–87). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Smith, S. R. (2017). Model of dynamic differentiation (MoDD): Innovation education for talent development. In T. S. Yamin, K. W. McCluskey, T. Lubart, D. Ambrose, K. C. McCluskey, & S. Linke (Eds.), Innovation education (pp. 41–66). Ulm, Germany: The International Centre for Innovation in Education (ICIE).
Smith, S. R. (2020). Using the Model of Dynamic Differentiation to guide scaffolding intellectually gifted students’ learning. In S. R. Smith (Ed), International Handbook of Giftedness & Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific (pp.?-?). Singapore: Springer International Handbooks of Education.
Smith, S. R., & Lu, C. H. (2015). Nurturing interdisciplinary interconnections to enhance theoretical talent development: Using metaphor to reflect on Ambrose’s insights for gifted education. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 3, 77–92.
Tishman, S. (2018). Slow looking: The art and practice of learning through observation. New York, NY: Routledge.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in middle school: One school’s journey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 77–87.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classroom (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Trotman, D. (2010). Liberating the wise educator: Cultivating professional judgment in educational practice. In A. Craft, H. Gardner, & G. Claxton (Eds.), Creativity, wisdom and trusteeship: Exploring the role of education. New York, NY: Sage.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walsh, D. (2002). Constructing an artistic self: A cultural perspective. In L. Bresler & C. Thompson (Eds.), The arts in children’s lives: Context, culture, and curriculum (pp. 101–111). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wu, W. T. (2013). The 40th anniversary of gifted education in Taiwan (III): Confusion and enlightenment. Gifted Education Quarterly, 128, 7–14.
Wu, R. (2018). Xie Yi painting: A Chinese cultural therapy. In D. Scharff (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy in China (Vol. 2, pp. 1–36). New York, NY: Routledge.
Yen, H.-C. (2015). Human nature and learning in ancient China. In S. Hsu & Y.-Y. Wu (Eds.), Education as cultivation in Chinese culture (pp. 19–43). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lu, Ch., Chen, WR. (2019). Attuned Pedagogy: The Artistry of Differentiated Instruction from a Taiwanese Cultural Perspective. In: Smith, S. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3021-6_41-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3021-6_41-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3021-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3021-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education