Advertisement

Using Magnetic Helicity, Topology, and Geometry to Investigate Complex Magnetic Fields

  • Étienne PariatEmail author
Chapter
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 591)

Abstract

The complexity of magnetic fields is one of the essential ingredients of any magnetohydrodynamic study, with analysis depending heavily on 3D visualization. We discuss several approaches that enable us to analyze 3D magnetic fields in a synthetic manner. These approaches make use of the topology and geometry of magnetic fields and, in particular, the measure of magnetic helicity.

References

  1. A.K. Al-Hachami, D.I. Pontin, Magnetic reconnection at 3D null points: effect of magnetic field asymmetry. Astron. Astrophys. 512, A84 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. J.J. Aly, T. Amari, Current sheets in two-dimensional potential magnetic fields. III. Formation in complex topology configurations and application to coronal heating. Astron. Astrophys. 319, 699–719 (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Aulanier, P. Démoulin, B. Schmieder, C. Fang, Y.H. Tang, Magnetohydrostatic model of a bald-patch flare. Sol. Phys. 183(2), 369–388 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. G. Aulanier, E. DeLuca, S.K. Antiochos, R.A. McMullen, L. Golub, The topology and evolution of the bastille day flare. Astrophys. J. 540(2), 1126–1142 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Aulanier, E. Pariat, P. Démoulin, Current sheet formation in quasi-separatrix layers and hyperbolic flux tubes. Astron. Astrophys. 444(3), 961–976 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. G. Aulanier, E. Pariat, P. Démoulin, C.R. DeVore, Slip-running reconnection in Quasi-separatrix layers. Sol. Phys. 238(2), 347–376 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. G. Aulanier, L. Golub, E. DeLuca, J.W. Cirtain, R. Kano, L.L. Lundquist, N. Narukage, T. Sakao, M.A. Weber, Slipping magnetic reconnection in coronal loops. Science 318, 1588 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. L.G. Bagalá, C.H. Mandrini, M.G. Rovira, P. Démoulin, Magnetic reconnection: a common origin for flares and AR interconnecting arcs. Astron. Astrophys. 363, 779 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. M.A. Berger, Rigorous new limits on magnetic helicity dissipation in the solar corona. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 30(1–2), 79–104 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. M.A. Berger, Magnetic helicity in space physics, in Magnetic Helicity in Space and Laboratory Plasmas (American Geophysical Union, Washington, 1999), pp. 1–9Google Scholar
  11. M.A. Berger, Topological quantities in magnetohydrodynamics, in Advances in Nonlinear Dynamos. The Fluid Mechanics of Astrophysics and Geophysics (Taylor & Francis, London, 2003), pp. 345–374Google Scholar
  12. M.A. Berger, G.B. Field, The topological properties of magnetic helicity. J. Fluid Mech. 147(1), 133–148 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. M.N. Billinghurst, I.J.D. Craig, A.D. Sneyd, Current-sheet formation in two-dimensional coronal fields. Astron. Astrophys. 279, 589–598 (1993)Google Scholar
  14. A. Brandenburg, K. Subramanian, Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory. Phys. Rep. 417(1), 1–209 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Büchner, Locating current sheets in the solar corona. Space Sci. Rev. 122, 149 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Chae, Observational determination of the rate of magnetic helicity transport through the solar surface via the horizontal motion of field line footpoints. Astrophys. J. 560(1), L95–L98 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Chae, Measurements of magnetic helicity injected through the solar photosphere. Adv. Space Res. 39, 1700 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Chandra, B. Schmieder, C.H. Mandrini, P. Démoulin, E. Pariat, T. Török, W. Uddin, Homologous flares and magnetic field topology in active region NOAA 10501 on 20 November 2003. Sol. Phys. 269(1), 83–104 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. R. Chandra, C.H. Mandrini, B. Schmieder, B. Joshi, G.D. Cristiani, H. Cremades, E. Pariat, F.A. Nuevo, A.K. Srivastava, W. Uddin, Blowout jets and impulsive eruptive flares in a bald-patch topology. Astron. Astrophys. 598, A41 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. K. Dalmasse, E. Pariat, P. Démoulin, G. Aulanier, Photospheric injection of magnetic helicity: connectivity-based flux density method. Sol. Phys. 289(1), 107–136 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Dalmasse, E. Pariat, G. Valori, J. Jing, P. Démoulin, Studying the transfer of magnetic helicity in solar active regions with the connectivity-based helicity flux density method. Astrophys. J. 852(2), 141 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. P. Démoulin, Extending the concept of separatrices to QSLs for magnetic reconnection. Adv. Space Res. 37, 1269 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. P. Démoulin, E. Pariat, Modelling and observations of photospheric magnetic helicity. Adv. Space Res. 43(7), 1013–1031 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. P. Démoulin, E.R. Priest, C.H. Mandrini, Quasi-Separatrix layers in solar flares. I. Method. Astron. Astrophys. 308, 643–655 (1996)Google Scholar
  25. P. Démoulin, L.G. Bagalá, C.H. Mandrini, J.C. Hénoux, M.G. Rovira, Quasi-separatrix layers in solar flares. II. Observed magnetic configurations. Astron. Astrophys. 325, 305 (1997)Google Scholar
  26. C.R. DeVore, Magnetic helicity generation by solar differential rotation. Astrophys. J. 539(2), 944–953 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Dudík, M. Janvier, G. Aulanier, G. Del Zanna, M. Karlický, H.E. Mason, B. Schmieder, Slipping magnetic reconnection during an X-class solar flare observed by SDO/AIA. Astrophys. J. 784(2), 144 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. F. Effenberger, K. Thust, L. Arnold, R. Grauer, J. Dreher, Numerical simulation of current sheet formation in a quasiseparatrix layer using adaptive mesh refinement. Phys. Plasmas 18, 2902 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. J.H. Finn, T.M. Antonsen, Magnetic helicity: what is it, and what is it good for? Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 9, 111–126 (1985)Google Scholar
  30. U. Frisch, A. Pouquet, J. Leorat, A. Mazure, Possibility of an inverse cascade of magnetic helicity in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 68(04), 769–778 (1975)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. J. Fuentes-Fernández, C.E. Parnell, Dynamical relaxation of coronal magnetic fields. III. 3D spiral nulls. Astron. Astrophys. 544, 77 (2012)Google Scholar
  32. J. Fuentes-Fernández, C.E. Parnell, Dynamical relaxation of coronal magnetic fields. IV. 3D tilted nulls. Astron. Astrophys. 554, A145 (2013)Google Scholar
  33. V. Gaizauskas, C.H. Mandrini, P. Démoulin, M.L. Luoni, M.G. Rovira, Interactions between nested sunspots. II. A confined X1 flare in a delta-type sunspot. Astron. Astrophys. 332, 353–366 (1998)Google Scholar
  34. D. Galassi, Numerical modelling of transport and turbulence in tokamak edge plasma with divertor configuration. PhD thesis, Aix-Marseille Université, 2017Google Scholar
  35. K. Galsgaard, V.S. Titov, T. Neukirch, Magnetic pinching of hyperbolic flux tubes. II. Dynamic numerical model. Astrophys. J. 595, 506 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. K. Galsgaard, M.S. Madjarska, F. Moreno-Insertis, Z. Huang, T. Wiegelmann, Magnetic topological analysis of coronal bright points. Astron. Astrophys. 606, A46 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. G.A. Gary, Plasma beta above a solar active region: rethinking the paradigm. Sol. Phys. 203, 71–86 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. W. Gekelman, E. Lawrence, A. Collette, S. Vincena, B. Van Compernolle, P. Pribyl, M. Berger, J. Campbell, Magnetic field line reconnection in the current systems of flux ropes and Alfvén waves. Phys. Scr. 142, 014032 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. W. Gekelman, E. Lawrence, B. Van Compernolle, Three-dimensional reconnection involving magnetic flux ropes. Astrophys. J. 753(2), 131 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. W. Gekelman, T. DeHaas, B. Van Compernolle, W. Daughton, P. Pribyl, S. Vincena, D. Hong, Experimental study of the dynamics of a thin current sheet. Phys. Scr. 91(5), 054002 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. M.K. Georgoulis, K. Tziotziou, N.-E. Raouafi, Magnetic energy and helicity budgets in the active-region solar corona. II. Nonlinear force-free approximation. Astrophys. J. 759(1), 1 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. V.S. Gorbachev, B.V. Somov, Solar flares of 1980NOV5 as the result of magnetic reconnection at a separator. Sov. Astron. 33, 57 (1989)Google Scholar
  43. Y. Guo, M.-D. Ding, B. Schmieder, H. Li, T. Török, T. Wiegelmann, Driving mechanism and onset condition of a confined eruption. Astrophys. J. Lett. 725(1), L38–L42 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Y. Guo, M.-D. Ding, X. Cheng, J. Zhao, E. Pariat, Twist accumulation and topology structure of a solar magnetic flux rope. Astrophys. J. 779(2), 157 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. A.L. Haynes, C.E. Parnell, A trilinear method for finding null points in a three-dimensional vector space. Phys. Plasmas 14(8), 082107 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. A.L. Haynes, C.E. Parnell, A method for finding three-dimensional magnetic skeletons. Phys. Plasmas 17, 2903 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. M. Hesse, K. Schindler, A theoretical foundation of general magnetic reconnection. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 5559 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. M. Janvier, G. Aulanier, E. Pariat, P. Démoulin, The standard flare model in three dimensions. III. Slip-running reconnection properties. Astron. Astrophys. 555, 77 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. M. Janvier, A. Savcheva, E. Pariat, S. Tassev, S. Millholland, V. Bommier, P. McCauley, S. McKillop, F. Dougan, Evolution of flare ribbons, electric currents, and quasi-separatrix layers during an X-class flare. Astron. Astrophys. 591, A141 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. C. Jiang, X. Feng, S.T. Wu, Q. Hu, Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of a Sigmoid eruption of active region 11283. Astrophys. J. Lett. 771(2), L30 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. B.J. LaBonte, M.K. Georgoulis, D.M. Rust, Survey of magnetic helicity injection in regions producing X-class flares. Astrophys. J. 671, 955 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Y. Liu, P.W. Schuck, Magnetic energy and helicity in two emerging active regions in the sun. Astrophys. J. 761(2), 105 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Y. Liu, P.W. Schuck, A note on computation of relative magnetic-helicity flux across the photosphere. Sol. Phys. 283(2), 283–294 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Y. Liu, J. Zhao, P.W. Schuck, Horizontal flows in the photosphere and subphotosphere of two active regions. Sol. Phys. 287(1), 279–291 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. D.W. Longcope, Topological methods for the analysis of solar magnetic fields. Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 2, 7 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. D.W. Longcope, A. Malanushenko, Defining and calculating self-helicity in coronal magnetic fields. Astrophys. J. 674(2), 1130–1143 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. B.C. Low, R. Wolfson, Spontaneous formation of electric current sheets and the origin of solar flares. Astrophys. J. 324, 574–581 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. N. Lugaz, C. Downs, K. Shibata, I. Roussev, A. Asai, T.I. Gombosi, Numerical investigation of a coronal mass ejection from an anemone active region: reconnection and deflection of the 2005 August 22 eruption. Astrophys. J. 738(2), 127 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. C.H. Mandrini, P. Démoulin, M.G. Rovira, J.-F. de La Beaujardière, Constraints on flare models set by the active region magnetic topology magnetic topology of AR 6233. Astron. Astrophys. 303, 927 (1995)Google Scholar
  60. C.H. Mandrini, P. Démoulin, L.G. Bagalá, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi, J.C. Hénoux, B. Schmieder, M.G. Rovira, Evidence of magnetic reconnection from Hα, soft X-ray and photospheric magnetic field observations. Sol. Phys. 174, 229 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. C.H. Mandrini, P. Démoulin, B. Schmieder, Y.Y. Deng, P. Rudawy, The role of magnetic bald patches in surges and arch filament systems. Astron. Astrophys. 391, 317 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. C.H. Mandrini, P. Démoulin, B. Schmieder, E. DeLuca, E. Pariat, W. Uddin, Companion event and precursor of the X17 flare on 28 October 2003. Sol. Phys. 238(2), 293–312 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. S. Masson, E. Pariat, G. Aulanier, C.J. Schrijver, The nature of flare ribbons in coronal null-point topology. Astrophys. J. 700(1), 559–578 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. S. Masson, G. Aulanier, E. Pariat, K.-L. Klein, Interchange slip-running reconnection and sweeping SEP beams. Sol. Phys. 276(1), 199–217 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. S. Masson, P. McCauley, L. Golub, K.K. Reeves, E. DeLuca, Dynamics of the transition corona. Astrophys. J. 787(2), 145 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. S. Masson, E. Pariat, G. Valori, N. Deng, C. Liu, H. Wang, H. Reid, Flux rope, hyperbolic flux tube, and late extreme ultraviolet phases in a non-eruptive circular-ribbon flare. Astron. Astrophys. 604, A76 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. L.J. Milano, P. Dmitruk, C.H. Mandrini, D.O. Gómez, P. Démoulin, Quasi-separatrix layers in a reduced magnetohydrodynamic model of a coronal loop. Astrophys. J. 521, 889 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. H.K. Moffatt, The degree of knottedness of tangled vortex lines. J. Fluid Mech. 35(01), 117–129 (1969)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. K. Moraitis, K. Tziotziou, M.K. Georgoulis, V. Archontis, Validation and benchmarking of a practical free magnetic energy and relative magnetic helicity budget calculation in solar magnetic structures. Sol. Phys. 289, 122 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. A. Nindos, J. Zhang, H.Q. Zhang, The magnetic helicity budget of solar active regions and coronal mass ejections. Astrophys. J. 594, 1033 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. E. Pariat, P. Démoulin, Estimation of the squashing degree within a three-dimensional domain. Astron. Astrophys. 541, A78 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. E. Pariat, G. Aulanier, B. Schmieder, M.K. Georgoulis, D.M. Rust, P.N. Bernasconi, Resistive emergence of undulatory flux tubes. Astrophys. J. 614(2), 1099–1112 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. E. Pariat, P. Démoulin, M.A. Berger, Photospheric flux density of magnetic helicity. Astron. Astrophys. 439(3), 1191–1203 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. E. Pariat, G. Aulanier, P. Démoulin, A new concept for magnetic reconnection: slip-running reconnection, in SF2A-2006: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed. by D. Barret (2006a), p. 559Google Scholar
  75. E. Pariat, G. Aulanier, B. Schmieder, M.K. Georgoulis, D.M. Rust, P.N. Bernasconi, Emergence of undulatory magnetic flux tubes by small scale reconnections. Adv. Space Res. 38(5), 902–905 (2006b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. E. Pariat, S.K. Antiochos, C.R. DeVore, A model for solar polar jets. Astrophys. J. 691(1), 61–74 (2009a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. E. Pariat, S. Masson, G. Aulanier, Current buildup in emerging serpentine flux tubes. Astrophys. J. 701(2), 1911–1921 (2009b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. E. Pariat, K. Dalmasse, C.R. DeVore, S.K. Antiochos, J.T. Karpen, Model for straight and helical solar jets. I. Parametric studies of the magnetic field geometry. Astron. Astrophys. 573, A130 (2015a)Google Scholar
  79. E. Pariat, G. Valori, P. Démoulin, K. Dalmasse, Testing magnetic helicity conservation in a solar-like active event. Astron. Astrophys. 580, A128 (2015b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. E. Pariat, J.E. Leake, G. Valori, M.G. Linton, F.P. Zuccarello, K. Dalmasse, Relative magnetic helicity as a diagnostic of solar eruptivity. Astron. Astrophys. 601, A125 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. C.E. Parnell, E.R. Priest, L. Golub, The three-dimensional structures of X-ray bright points. Sol. Phys. 151(1), 57–74 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. C.E. Parnell, T. Neukirch, E.R. Priest, Structure and collapse of three-dimensional magnetic neutral points. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 84, 245 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. C.E. Parnell, A.L. Haynes, K. Galsgaard, Structure of magnetic separators and separator reconnection. J. Geophys. Res. 115, A02102 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. D. Pérez-Suárez, R.C. Maclean, J.G. Doyle, M.S. Madjarska, The structure and dynamics of a bright point as seen with Hinode, SoHO and TRACE. Astron. Astrophys. 492, 575 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. D.I. Pontin, E.R. Priest, K. Galsgaard, On the nature of reconnection at a solar coronal null point above a separatrix dome. Astrophys. J. 774(2), 154 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. D. Pontin, K. Galsgaard, P. Démoulin, Why are flare ribbons associated with the spines of magnetic null points generically elongated? Sol. Phys. 291(6), 1739–1759 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. E.R. Priest, T.G. Forbes, Magnetic flipping - reconnection in three dimensions without null points. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 1521 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. A.L. Restante, S. Markidis, G. Lapenta, T. Intrator, Geometrical investigation of the kinetic evolution of the magnetic field in a periodic flux rope. Phys. Plasmas 20(8), 082501 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. G.V. Rudenko, I.I. Myshyakov, Gauge-invariant helicity for force-free magnetic fields in a rectangular box. Sol. Phys. 270(1), 165–173 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. D.M. Rust, Spawning and shedding helical magnetic fields in the solar atmosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21(4), 241–244 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. A. Savcheva, E. Pariat, S. McKillop, P. McCauley, E. Hanson, Y. Su, E. DeLuca, The relation between solar eruption topologies and observed flare features. II. Dynamical evolution. Astrophys. J. 817(1), 43 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. B. Schmieder, Y. Guo, F. Moreno-Insertis, G. Aulanier, L.Y. Chaouche, N. Nishizuka, L.K. Harra, J.K. Thalmann, S.V. Domínguez, Y. Liu, Twisting solar coronal jet launched at the boundary of an active region. Astron. Astrophys. 559, 1 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. P.W. Schuck, Tracking vector magnetograms with the magnetic induction equation. Astrophys. J. 683, 1134 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. R.B. Scott, D.I. Pontin, G. Hornig, On the magnetic squashing factor and the lie transport of tangents. Astrophys. J. 848(2), 117 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. N. Seehafer, On the magnetic field line topology in solar active regions. Sol. Phys. 105(2), 223–235 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. J.E.H. Stevenson, C.E. Parnell, Spontaneous reconnection at a separator current layer: 1. Nature of the reconnection. J. Geophys. Res. 120(1), 10 (2015a)Google Scholar
  97. J.E.H. Stevenson, C.E. Parnell, Spontaneous reconnection at a separator current layer: 2. Nature of the waves and flows. J. Geophys. Res. 120(1), 10 (2015b)Google Scholar
  98. J.E.H. Stevenson, C.E. Parnell, E.R. Priest, A.L. Haynes, The nature of separator current layers in MHS equilibria. I. Current parallel to the separator. Astron. Astrophys. 573, A44 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. S. Tassev, A. Savcheva, QSL squasher: a fast Quasi-separatrix layer map calculator. Astrophys. J. 840(2), 89 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. J.B. Taylor, Relaxation of toroidal plasma and generation of reverse magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33(1), 1139–1141 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. J.K. Thalmann, B. Inhester, T. Wiegelmann, Estimating the relative helicity of coronal magnetic fields. Sol. Phys. 272(2), 243–255 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. J. Threlfall, T. Neukirch, C.E. Parnell, S.E. Oskoui, Particle acceleration at a reconnecting magnetic separator. Astron. Astrophys. 574, A7 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. J. Threlfall, J.E.H. Stevenson, C.E. Parnell, T. Neukirch, Particle acceleration at reconnecting separator current layers. Astron. Astrophys. 585, A95 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. V.S. Titov, Generalized squashing factors for covariant description of magnetic connectivity in the solar corona. Astrophys. J. 660, 863 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. V.S. Titov, E.R. Priest, P. Démoulin, Conditions for the appearance of “bald patches” at the solar surface. Astron. Astrophys. 276, 564 (1993)Google Scholar
  106. V.S. Titov, G. Hornig, P. Démoulin, Theory of magnetic connectivity in the solar corona. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1164 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. V.S. Titov, Z. Mikić, J.A. Linker, R. Lionello, S.K. Antiochos, Magnetic topology of coronal hole linkages. Astrophys. J. 731(2), 111 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. V.S. Titov, Z. Mikić, T. Török, J.A. Linker, O. Panasenco, 2010 August 1–2 sympathetic eruptions. I. Magnetic topology of the source-surface background field. Astrophys. J. 759(1), 70 (2012)Google Scholar
  109. V.S. Titov, Z. Mikić, T. Török, J.A. Linker, O. Panasenco, 2010 August 1–2 Sympathetic eruptions. II. Magnetic topology of the MHD background field. Astrophys. J. 845(2), 141 (2017)Google Scholar
  110. G. Valori, P. Démoulin, E. Pariat, Comparing values of the relative magnetic helicity in finite volumes. Sol. Phys. 278(2), 347–366 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. G. Vekstein, E.R. Priest, T. Amari, Formation of current sheets in force-free magnetic fields. Astron. Astrophys. 243, 492–500 (1991)Google Scholar
  112. B.T. Welsch, W.P. Abbett, M.L. De Rosa, G.H. Fisher, M.K. Georgoulis, K. Kusano, D.W. Longcope, B. Ravindra, P.W. Schuck, Tests and comparisons of velocity-inversion techniques. Astrophys. J. 670(2), 1434–1452 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. T. Wiegelmann, J.K. Thalmann, S.K. Solanki, The magnetic field in the solar atmosphere. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 22, 78 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. A.L. Wilmot-Smith, G. Hornig, D.I. Pontin, Magnetic braiding and Quasi-separatrix layers. Astrophys. J. 704(2), 1288–1295 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. A.L. Wilmot-Smith, D.I. Pontin, G. Hornig, Dynamics of braided coronal loops. I. Onset of magnetic reconnection. Astron. Astrophys. 516, 5 (2010)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. L. Woltjer, A theorem on force-free magnetic fields. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 44, 489–491 (1958)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. P.F. Wyper, D.I. Pontin, Non-linear tearing of 3D null point current sheets. Phys. Plasmas 21(8), 082114 (2014a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. P.F. Wyper, D.I. Pontin, Dynamic topology and flux rope evolution during non-linear tearing of 3D null point current sheets. Phys. Plasmas 21(1), 102102 (2014b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. P.F. Wyper, C.R. DeVore, J.T. Karpen, B.J. Lynch, Three-dimensional simulations of tearing and intermittency in coronal jets. Astrophys. J. 827(1), 4 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. S. Yang, J. Büchner, J.C. Santos, H.Q. Zhang, Evolution of relative magnetic helicity: method of computation and its application to a simulated solar corona above an active region. Sol. Phys. 283(2), 369–382 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. F.P. Zuccarello, E. Pariat, G. Valori, L. Linan, Threshold of non-potential magnetic helicity ratios at the onset of solar eruptions. Astrophys. J. 863, 41 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LESIA, Observatoire de ParisUniversité PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris CitéMeudonFrance

Personalised recommendations