Skip to main content

Brain Dominance and Learning Style Preference of Quantity Surveying Students in South Africa and Malaysia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Creativity, Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Communication of Design (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1218))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1604 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the brain dominance of quantity surveying students in South Africa and Malaysia to determine the learning style preference to which they best relate. It further aims to establish if there is any correlation in brain dominance of quantity surveying students in different countries. A quantitative research methodology was applied, making use of a questionnaire consisting of short questions. The research respondents were third-year undergraduate quantity surveying students at the University of Pretoria and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Data collection and analysis was undertaken at the University of Pretoria. The most dominant brain quadrant for South African quantity surveying students was the lower left quadrant B (organised, sequential, controlled, planned structured, detailed, and scheduled). For the Malaysian students, it was the upper left quadrant A (analytical, technical, logical, rational, and precise). A comparative analysis between the two student groups indicated that there was a difference in brain dominance, although not significant. Adapting teaching techniques according to these findings may help students to better process and engage with module content at a higher educational level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sweeney, E.: Beyond the technical: the soft skills needed to succeed in construction (2018). https://jobsite.procore.com/beyond-the-technical-the-soft-skills-needed-to-succeed-in-construction/

  2. Shakir, R.: ‘Soft skills at the Malaysian institutes of higher learning’, Asia Pacific. Educ. Rev. 10, 309–315 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9038-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahasneh, J.K. Thabet, W.: Rethinking construction curriculum: a descriptive cause analysis for the soft skills gap among construction graduates. In: 51st ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings, viewed 11 March 2016 (2015). from https://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2015/paper/CEUE391002015.Pdf

  4. Park, C.C.: Learning style preferences of southeast asian students. In: URBAN EDUCATION, vol. 35 No. 3, September 2000, 245–268 © 2000. Corwin Press, Inc. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maritz, M.J. Sigle, H.M.: Quantity Surveying Practice in South Africa. Construction Economics Associates (Pty) Ltd., Pretoria (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Heerden, H., Eck, E., Burger, M.K.: Learning style preferences of undergraduate quantity surveying students. Quant. Surv. 118–127 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18638/hassacc.2016.4.1.191

  7. Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology (EBIT). Rules and regulations part 2 (Excerpt). University of Pretoria (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. le Roux, I.: New large class pedagogy: developing students’ whole brain thinking skills 1877–0428 © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.116. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15 (2011) 426–435 WCES-2011

  9. Sarikaya1, B., Söylemez, Y.: Evaluation of acquisition of comprehension skills according to whole brain model. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 6(11), 2444–2452 (2018). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061107, http://www.hrpub.org

  10. Munro, M., Coetzee, M.-H.: Mind the gap: beyond wholebrain learning. South Afr. Theatre J. 21(1), 92–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/10137548.2007.9687856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coetzee, M.-H., Munro, M., de Boer, A.: Deeper sites through various lines: LMS and whole-brain learning in body/voice training for performers in the HET band. South Afr. Theatre J. 18(1), 135–158 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/10137548.2004.9687784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes, M., Hughes, P., Hodgkinson, I.R.: In pursuit of a ‘whole-brain’ approach to undergraduate teaching: implications of the Herrmann brain dominance model. Stud. Higher Educ. 42(12), 2389–2405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1152463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. HBDI (2019). <http://www.hbdi.com/online-reference-and-activity-guide/a/index.html>. Accessed 7 Dec 2019

  14. Herrmann International: How does your profile compare to others. Lake Lure, North Carolina: The Ned Herrmann Group (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andries (Hennie) van Heerden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

van Heerden, A.(., Burger, M., van Eck, E. (2020). Brain Dominance and Learning Style Preference of Quantity Surveying Students in South Africa and Malaysia. In: Markopoulos, E., Goonetilleke, R., Ho, A., Luximon, Y. (eds) Advances in Creativity, Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Communication of Design. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51626-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51626-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51625-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51626-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics