Abstract
The design process involved complex social, cultural as well as political issues. More skills are required for providing an interactive design experience. The designers organise and structure problems through interactive communication, service, artworks and design. As a result, designers were expected as applied behavioural scientists. The undergraduate design students, those are designers in the future, were disappointingly undereducated for their career. Creative students especially often neglect to recognise their tasks’ complexity and connect them with the knowledge they already obtained. They often lack the requisite understanding that their viewpoints must be built on a knowledgeable foundation. Some scholars discussed various teaching and learning approaches, including applying computer-assisted learning, problem-based learning, and inquiry-based learning to explore applicable methods, especially for the design field. However, there were still not yet able to propose practical tools for training design students to interlock the complexity of individual and social behaviours under the influence of technical and social development. Hence, there is a need to explore a collaborative and scientific design education method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sutherland, J.A., Topping, K.J.: Collaborative creative writing in eight-year-olds: comparing cross-ability fixed role and same-ability reciprocal role pairing. J. Res. Read. 22(2), 154–179 (1999)
O’Donnell, A.M., Topping, K.J.: Peers assessing peers: possibilities and problems. In: Topping, K., Ehly, S. (eds.) Peer-Assisted Learning, pp. 255–278. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1998)
Greenberg, S.: Embedding a design studio course in a conventional computer science program. In: IFIP International Federation for Information Processing of Creativity and HCI: From Experience to Design in Education, vol. 289, pp. 23–41. Springer, Boston (2009)
Brocato, K.: Studio based learning: proposing, critiquing, iterating our way to person-centeredness for better classroom management. Theory into Pract. 48, 138–146 (2009)
Clinton, G., Reiber, L.P.: The studio experience at the University of Georgia: an example of constructionist learning for adults. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 58, 755–780 (2010)
Cennamo, K., Brandt, C.: The “right kind of telling”: knowledge building in the academic design studio. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 60(5), 839–858 (2012)
Chan, M.M., Blikstein, P.: Exploring problem-based learning for middle school design and engineering education in digital fabrication laboratories. Interdiscip. J. Probl.-Based Learn. 12(2), 7 (2018)
Ram, P., Ram, A., Spragues, C.: From student learner to professional learner: training for lifelong learning through on-line PBL. In: International Conference Problem-Based Learning (PBL-05) (2007)
Barrows, H.S.: Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: a brief overview. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 1996(68), 3–12 (1996)
Savery, J.R.: Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Essent. Read. Probl.-Based Learn.: Explor. Extending Leg. Howard S. Barrows 9, 5–15 (2015)
Awang, H., Ramly, I.: Through problem-based learning: pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom. Int. J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 2(4), 18–23 (2008)
Tiwari, A., Lai, P., So, M., Yuen, K.: A comparison of the effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of students’ critical thinking. Med. Educ. 40(6), 547–554 (2006)
Hmelo-Silver, C.: Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16(3), 235–266 (2004)
Blikstein, P.: Maker movement in education: history and prospects. Handbook of Technology Education, pp. 419–437 (2018)
Don, Y.: Implementation of problem-based learning to improve students’ critical thinking skills. JPhCS 1460(1), 012058 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ho, A.G. (2021). Application of Assessment-Analytic Knowledge Building Tools in Collaborative Creative Studies. In: Nazir, S., Ahram, T.Z., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 269. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80000-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80000-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79999-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80000-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)