Skip to main content

Blended Learning. Exploring Contradictory Demands Between Emerging Design Principles and New Learning Practices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 269))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1165 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine blended learning activities in two Master of Maritime Management courses, preparing students for work with innovation and organisational development. A comparison of the design approaches of digital Canvas rooms and blended learning activities is conducted. The data consists of qualitative interviews, students’ midterm evaluation and screen dumps of the learning environment. The findings reveal tensions between different pedagogical approaches and teachers’ construction of activities, pointing towards the contradictory demands between new learning practices and emerging design principles. In particular, analyses display the challenges for the students to understand the norms and rules of how to participate and engage in blended learning activities and their expectations of an active teacher role. Hence, the layers of accountability serves as a compelling concept to explain how increased digitalisation of courses change both teaching practices and students ways of participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bridgstock, R.: Educating for digital futures: what the learning strategies of digital media professionals can teach higher education. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 53(3), 306–315 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alammary, A., Sheard, J., Carbone, A.: Blended learning in higher education: three different design approaches. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 30(4), 440–454 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Norberg, A., Dziuban, C.D, Moskal, P.D.: A time-based blended learning model. Horizon 19, 207–216 (2011). http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/oth

  4. Huang, R., Zhou, Y.: Designing blended learning focused on knowledge category and learning activities. In: Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R. (eds.) Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, pp. 296–310. Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deperlioglu, O., Kose, U.: The effectiveness and experiences of blended learning approaches to computer programming education. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 21, 328–342 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, G., Fong, W.W., Gordon, J.: Blended learning: the view is different from student, teacher, or institution perspective. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Fong, J., Fong, W., Wang, F.L., Kwok, L.F. (eds.) ICHL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8038, pp. 356–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39750-9_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Greene, J.: Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? J. Mixed Methods Res. 2(1), 7–22 (2008). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969

  8. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K.: Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garrison, D.R., Kanuka, H.: Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 7, 95–105 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garrison, D.R., Vaughan, N.D.: Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. Wiley, San Francisco (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Driscoll, M.: Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype (2002). http://www07.ibm.com/services/pdf/blended_learning.pdf

  12. Oliver, M., Trigwell, K.: Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? E-learn. Digital Media 2, 17–26 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sellberg, C., Lindmark, O., Lundin, M.: Certifying navigational skills: a video-based study on assessments in simulated environments. TransNav Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 13 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y.S.: The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, Inc. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clarke, V., Braun, V.: Teaching thematic analysis: overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. Psychologist 26(2), 120–123 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., Resnick, L.B.: Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Stud. Philos. Educ. 27(4), 283–297 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiig, C., Wittek, A.L., Erstad, O.: Teachers, tools and accountable practices. Engaging with a wiki blog as a learning resource. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.07.001

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by MARitim KOMpetanse mot 2020 (MARKOM 2020), by the Norwegian Ministry of Education, project no. T136. Undervisningsmetodikk basert på Blended Learning. I would like to thank the teachers, students, informants and project members for their support and engagement. In particular, I would like to thank Veronica Jaramillo Jiminez and Marius Imset for their wise comments and contributions on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid Camilla Wiig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wiig, A.C. (2021). Blended Learning. Exploring Contradictory Demands Between Emerging Design Principles and New Learning Practices. In: Nazir, S., Ahram, T.Z., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 269. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80000-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics